Margaret I. Liang

Dr. Margaret I. Liang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang
MPMaria Pisu
Maria Pisu
SSSarah S. Summerlin
Sarah S. Summerlin
TBTeresa K.L. Boitano
Teresa K.L. Boitano
CBChristina T. Blanchard
Christina T. Blanchard
WHWarner K. Huh
Warner K. Huh

7 February 2023 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang
RHRoss Harrison
Ross Harrison
EAEmeline M. Aviki
Emeline M. Aviki
KEKatharine M. Esselen
Katharine M. Esselen
RNRoni Nitecki
Roni Nitecki
LMLarissa Meyer
Larissa Meyer

1 October 2021 in JCO Oncology Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang
SSSarah S. Summerlin
Sarah S. Summerlin
CBChristina T. Blanchard
Christina T. Blanchard
TBTeresa K. L. Boitano
Teresa K. L. Boitano
WHWarner K. Huh
Warner K. Huh
MPMaria Pisu
Maria Pisu
PURPOSE: Our objective was to measure the trajectory of financial distress and to determine its relationship with quality of life (QOL) among patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal survey of patients with gynecologic cancer starting a new line of systemic therapy at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Financial distress was measured using a Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) < 26, and QOL was measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) with lower scores indicating worse responses. One-way repeated analysis of variances, generalized estimating equation models, and correlation coefficients were used to evaluate financial distress and QOL over time. RESULTS: There were 90 of 121 (74%) baseline participants with a 6-month follow-up. The average age was 60 years, 29% were African-American, 57% had an annual income < $40,000 in US dollars, and 6% were uninsured. At baseline, 54% of patients screened positive for financial distress, which was unchanged at 3 months (50%, P = .27) but decreased at 6 months (46%, P = .04) compared with baseline. There was no change in average COST (23.6, 25.1, 25.6; P = .33) or FACT-G (70.8, 71.0, 72.8; P = .68) over time. Less financial distress was moderately correlated with better QOL (r = 0.63, 0.61, 0.60) at each time point. The presence of financial distress was associated with a 16-point decrease in FACT-G QOL score over time. CONCLUSION: Upfront screening with COST identified 90% of patients who experienced financial distress, and COST did not change significantly over time. More severe financial distress was moderately correlated with worse QOL, and its presence was associated with a clinically meaningful 16-point decrease in QOL.

1 March 2021 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WGWhitney N. Goldsberry
Whitney N. Goldsberry
SSSarah S. Summerlin
Sarah S. Summerlin
AGAllison Guyton
Allison Guyton
BCBrittani Caddell
Brittani Caddell
WHWarner K. Huh
Warner K. Huh
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang

1 December 2013 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang
MRMaggie A. Rosen
Maggie A. Rosen
KRKellie S. Rath
Kellie S. Rath
ACAine E. Clements
Aine E. Clements
FBFloor Backes
Floor Backes
DCDavid E. Cohn
David E. Cohn

1 July 2018 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMargaret I. Liang
Margaret I. Liang
WHWarner K. Huh
Warner K. Huh