A grand challenge from the wind energy industry is to provide reliable forecasts on mountain winds several hours in advance at microscale (∼100 m) resolution. This requires better microscale wind-energy physics included in forecasting tools, for which field observations are imperative. While mesoscale (∼1 km) measurements abound, microscale processes are not monitored in practice nor do plentiful measurements exist at this scale. After a decade of preparation, a group of European and U.S. collaborators conducted a field campaign during 1 May–15 June 2017 in Vale Cobrão in central Portugal to delve into microscale processes in complex terrain. This valley is nestled within a parallel double ridge near the town of Perdigão with dominant wind climatology normal to the ridges, offering a nominally simple yet natural setting for fundamental studies. The dense instrument ensemble deployed covered a ∼4 km × 4 km swath horizontally and ∼10 km vertically, with measurement resolutions of tens of meters and seconds. Meteorological data were collected continuously, capturing multiscale flow interactions from synoptic to microscales, diurnal variability, thermal circulation, turbine wake and acoustics, waves, and turbulence. Particularly noteworthy are the extensiveness of the instrument array, space–time scales covered, use of leading-edge multiple-lidar technology alongside conventional tower and remote sensors, fruitful cross-Atlantic partnership, and adaptive management of the campaign. Preliminary data analysis uncovered interesting new phenomena. All data are being archived for public use.

The estimation of the background error statistics is a key issue for data assimilation. Their time average is estimated here using an analysis ensemble method. The experiments are performed with the nonstretched version of the Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle global model, in a perfect-model context. The global (spatially averaged) correlation functions are sharper in the ensemble method than in the so-called National Meteorological Center (NMC) method. This is shown to be closely related to the differences in the analysis step representation. The local (spatially varying) variances appear to reflect some effects of the data density and of the atmospheric variability. The resulting geographical contrasts are found to be partly different from those that are visible in the operational variances and in the NMC method. An economical estimate is also introduced to calculate and compare the local correlation length scales. This allows for the diagnosis of some existing heterogeneities and anisotropies. This information can also be useful for the modeling of heterogeneous covariances based, for example, on wavelets. The implementation of the global covariances and of the local variances, which are provided by the ensemble method, appears moreover to have a positive impact on the forecast quality.

In this study precipitation from a high resolutionWRFclimate simulation is presented and evaluated against daily gridded observations in the Iberian Peninsula. The simulation corresponds to a dynamical downscaling ofERA‐Interim, in the period 1989–2009, performed with two nested grids, at 27 and 9 km horizontal resolution. The higher resolution simulation indicates a significantly improved representation of Iberian precipitation fields, at all timescales, with emphasis on the representation of variability and of extreme weather statistics. Results compare well with recent studies with other models and/or for other regions, further supporting the use ofWRFas a regional climate model.

Precipitation over western Europe (WE) is projected to increase (decrease) roughly northward (equatorward) of 50°N during the 21st century. These changes are generally attributed to alterations in the regional large‐scale circulation, e.g., jet stream, cyclone activity, and blocking frequencies. A novel weather typing within the sector (30°W–10°E, 25–70°N) is used for a more comprehensive dynamical interpretation of precipitation changes. A k‐means clustering on daily mean sea level pressure was undertaken for ERA‐Interim reanalysis (1979–2014). Eight weather types are identified: S1, S2, S3 (summertime types), W1, W2, W3 (wintertime types), B1, and B2 (blocking‐like types). Their distinctive dynamical characteristics allow identifying the main large‐scale precipitation‐driving mechanisms. Simulations with 22 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 models for recent climate conditions show biases in reproducing the observed seasonality of weather types. In particular, an overestimation of weather type frequencies associated with zonal airflow is identified. Considering projections following the (Representative Concentration Pathways) RCP8.5 scenario over 2071–2100, the frequencies of the three driest types (S1, B2, and W3) are projected to increase (mainly S1, +4%) in detriment of the rainiest types, particularly W1 (−3%). These changes explain most of the precipitation projections over WE. However, a weather type‐independent background signal is identified (increase/decrease in precipitation over northern/southern WE), suggesting modifications in precipitation‐generating processes and/or model inability to accurately simulate these processes. Despite these caveats in the precipitation scenarios for WE, which must be duly taken into account, our approach permits a better understanding of the projected trends for precipitation over WE.