This study investigated survival, complications, revisions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for unconstrained total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTO) caused by intraarticular tibial plateau fractures with minimum four years follow-up. Forty-nine patients (71.4% male; 58.7 years) were included. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed with failure defined as TKA removal. Patients without failure underwent pre- and postoperative evaluation (range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), proximal tibial slope (PTS)) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) assessment at final follow-up. Fifteen (30.6%) patients had a complication, and eight (16.3%) patients underwent prosthesis removal at median 2.5 years. Cumulative survival rate of TKA was 79.6% at 20 years. A total of 32 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 years underwent further analyses. ROM (p = 0.028), aFTA (p = 0.044), pPS (p = 0.009), OKS (p < 0.001) and KSS (p < 0.001) improved significantly. SF-12 PCS was 42.3 and MCS was 54.4 at final follow-up. In general, one third of patients suffer a complication, and one in six patients has their prosthesis removed after TKA for PTO due to tibial plateau fractures. In patients who do not fail, TKA significantly improves clinical and radiographic outcomes at long-term follow-up.

(1) Background: In elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures, accompanying severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is discussed as a marker possibly warranting more aggressive surgical therapy. This study aimed to characterize adverse events as well as the radiological and functional outcomes of surgical vs. conservative therapy in patients with odontoid fracture and AAI. (2) Methods: Patients aged 65 years and older with type II odontoid fracture and AAI treated were included. AAI was assumed if the mean subluxation across both atlantoaxial facet joints in the sagittal plane was greater than 50%. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment, adverse events, radiological, and functional outcomes were analyzed. (3) Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in conservatively treated patients compared to patients with ventral or dorsal surgery. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (28.2%), affecting 10 surgically treated patients (35.7%), and 1 conservatively treated patient (9.1%). Moreover, 25 patients were followed-up (64.1%). One secondary dislocation occurred in the conservative group (11.1%) and three in the surgical group (18.8%). (4) Conclusions: Despite the potential for instability in this injury, conservative treatment does not seem to lead to unfavorable short-term results, less adverse events, and a shorter hospital stay and should thus be considered and discussed with patients as a treatment option, even in the presence of severe AAI.

Purpose: To determine the incidence of severe surgical adverse events (sSAE) after surgery of patients with subaxial cervical spine injury (sCS-Fx) and to identify patient, treatment, and injury-related risk factors. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data of sCS-Fx patients treated surgically between 2010 and 2020 at a single national trauma center. Baseline characteristics of demographic data, preexisting conditions, treatment, and injury morphology were extracted. Incidences of sSAEs within 60 days after surgery were analyzed. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression for the occurrence of one or more sSAEs were performed to identify risk factors. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Two hundred and ninety-two patients were included. At least one sSAE occurred in 49 patients (16.8%). Most frequent were sSAEs of the surgical site (wound healing disorder, infection, etc.) affecting 29 patients (9.9%). Independent potential risk factors in logistic regression were higher age (OR 1.02 [1.003–1.04], p = .022), the presence of one or more modifiers in the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification (OR 2.02 [1.03–3.96], p = .041), and potentially unstable or unstable facet injury (OR 2.49 [1.24–4.99], p = .010). Other suspected risk factors were not statistically significant, among these Injury Severity Score, the need for surgery for concomitant injuries, the primary injury type according to AO Spine, and preexisting medical conditions. Conclusion: sSAE rates after treatment of sCS-Fx are high. The identified risk factors are not perioperatively modifiable, but their knowledge should guide intra and postoperative care and surgical technique.

Introduction: This study analyzed the incidence of secondary dislocations (sDLs) after surgical stabilization of AO Spine type B and C injuries of the subaxial cervical spine (sCS). Materials and Methods: Patients treated for injuries of the sCS from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of sDL within 60 days after first surgery. A univariate analysis of variables potentially influencing the risk of sDL was performed. Patients with solitary anterior stabilization underwent subgroup analysis. The treatment of sDLs was described. Results: A total of 275 patients were included. sDLs occurred in 4.0% of patients (n = 11) in the total sample, most frequently after solitary anterior stabilization with 8.0% (n = 10, p = 0.010). Only one sDL occurred after combined stabilization and no sDLs after posterior stabilization. In the total sample and the anterior subgroup, variables significantly associated with sDL were older age (p = 0.001) and concomitant unstable facet joint injury (p = 0.020). No neurological deterioration occurred due to sDL and most patients were treated with added posterior stabilization. sDL is frequent after solitary anterior stabilization and rare after posterior or combined stabilization. Discussion: Patients of higher age and with unstable facet joint injuries should be followed up diligently to detect sDLs in time. Neurological deterioration does not regularly occur due to sDL, and most patients can be treated with added posterior stabilization.

Introduction: There is a lack of information on return to sport and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in amateur athletes after isolated spine injuries. Methods: A single-center cohort study in amateur athletes aged 18 to 60 with isolated spine injuries; clinical data collection and follow-up via telephone interview and standardized PROMs (Short-Form 36, Oswestry and Neck Disability Index, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Visual Analog Scale). Bivariate analyses of potential influencing factors on PROMs were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Out of the 80 included participants, 78% (n = 62) were active in sport at follow-up. PROMs were slightly worse than those described for the age-adjusted general population. There were consistent associations of better PROMs with having reached the subjective preinjury level of performance in sport, while injury severity and surgical or conservative therapy did not show consistent associations with PROMs. Conclusion: Most amateur athletes resume their sports activity after a spine injury. Better outcomes are associated with individuals’ resumption of sport and subjective level of performance, while injury severity and surgical or conservative therapy do not show consistent associations with PROMs, highlighting the importance of patient education, rehabilitation, and encouragement.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement is a technically demanding procedure with a high risk of neurovascular injuries in case of screw misplacement. In contrast to the thoracolumbar spine, there is limited data on percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. This study aims to compare the accuracy, blood loss and duration of surgery for open and percutaneous CPS placement for traumatic injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. In this retrospective single-center study, 22 patients undergoing percutaneous CPS placement were compared to a control group of 18 patients treated with open CPS placement. The screw position was analyzed in postoperative CT scans using the Neo and Bredow classifications. Additionally, intraoperative radiation exposure, duration of surgery, and blood loss were evaluated. The overall accuracy (perforation 0.99). None of the misplaced screws resulted in neurovascular injuries. One patient in the control group underwent revision surgery due to screw misplacement. The mean duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss were lower in percutaneous compared to open procedures. There was no significant difference in intraoperative radiation exposure between the two groups. The results suggest that percutaneous CPS placement in the subaxial spine is feasible with similar accuracy compared to open CPS placement. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes.