Thorsten Langer

Prof. Dr. Thorsten Langer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 January 2020 in Oncology Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJudith Gebauer
Judith Gebauer
KBKatja Baust
Katja Baust
EBEdit Bardi
Edit Bardi
DGDesiree Grabow
Desiree Grabow
ASAlexander Stein
Alexander Stein
TLThorsten Langer
Thorsten Langer
Background: Many childhood cancer survivors develop treatment-associated late effects emerging years or even decades after the end of treatment. Evidence-based guidelines recommend risk-adapted screening, facilitating early diagnosis and management of these sequelae. Long-term follow-up (LTFU) in specialized late effects clinics is devised to implement screening recommendations in the care of childhood cancer survivors. Objectives: To create a practical LTFU tool for the daily practice. Methods: Current guidelines and screening recommendations concerning LTFU in adult survivors of childhood cancer were reviewed and a comprehensive LTFU approach was developed. Results: A risk stratification model assigning patients to three risk groups with different screening recommendations and frequencies is presented based on current LTFU guidelines. Furthermore, a model of LTFU in a clinical multidisciplinary team is proposed. Conclusions: Although late morbidity and mortality in childhood cancer survivors have been attenuated in the last decade by reducing treatment toxicities, a high proportion of long-term survivors already is or will still be affected by treatment-associated chronic health conditions. With the knowledge of late effects and their occurrence as a consequence of specific treatment modalities, practical LTFU recommendations are essential to achieve standardized and structured LTFU care.

1 November 2015 in European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGesche Tallen
Gesche Tallen
ARAnika Resch
Anika Resch
GCGabriele Calaminus
Gabriele Calaminus
AWAndreas Wiener
Andreas Wiener
ULUlrike Leiss
Ulrike Leiss
SRStefan Rutkowski
Stefan Rutkowski

6 January 2020 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJannike Lisa Salchow
Jannike Lisa Salchow
JMJ. Mann
J. Mann
BKB. Koch
B. Koch
JGJ. von Grundherr
J. von Grundherr
WJW. Jensen
W. Jensen
ASA. Stein
A. Stein
Background: Improved, multimodal treatment strategies have been shown to increase cure rates in cancer patients. Those who survive cancer as a child, adolescent or young adult (CAYA), are at a higher risk for therapy-, or disease-related, late or long-term effects. The CARE for CAYA-Program has been developed to comprehensively assess any potential future problems, to offer need-based preventative interventions and thus to improve long-term outcomes in this particularly vulnerable population. Methods: The trial is designed as an adaptive trial with an annual comprehensive assessment followed by needs stratified, modular interventions, currently including physical activity, nutrition and psycho-oncology, all aimed at improving the lifestyle and/or the psychosocial situation of the patients. Patients, aged 15–39 years old, with a prior cancer diagnosis, who have completed tumour therapy and are in follow-up care, and who are tumour free, will be included. At baseline (and subsequently on an annual basis) the current medical and psychosocial situation and lifestyle of the participants will be assessed using a survey compiled of various validated questionnaires (e.g. EORTC QLQ C30, NCCN distress thermometer, PHQ-4, BSA, nutrition protocol) and objective parameters (e.g. BMI, WHR, co-morbidities like hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes), followed by basic care (psychological and lifestyle consultation). Depending on their needs, CAYAs will be allocated to preventative interventions in the above-mentioned modules over a 12-month period. After 1 year, the assessment will be repeated, and further interventions may be applied as needed. During the initial trial phase, the efficacy of this approach will be compared to standard care (waiting list with intervention in the following year) in a randomized study. During this phase, 530 CAYAs will be included and 320 eligible CAYAs who are willing to participate in the interventions will be randomly allocated to an intervention. Overall, 1500 CAYAs will be included and assessed. The programme is financed by the innovation fund of the German Federal Joint Committee and will be conducted at 14 German sites. Recruitment began in January 2018. Discussion: CAYAs are at high risk for long-term sequelae. Providing structured interventions to improve lifestyle and psychological situation may counteract against these risk factors. The programme serves to establish uniform regular comprehensive assessments and need-based interventions to improve long-term outcome in CAYA survivors. Trial registration: Registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (ID: DRKS00012504, registration date: 19th January 2018).

18 September 2018 in Die Innere Medizin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJ. Gebauer
J. Gebauer
HLH. Lehnert
H. Lehnert
SSSebastian Schmid
Sebastian Schmid
CSC. Spix
C. Spix
ASA. Stein
A. Stein
TLThorsten Langer
Thorsten Langer

22 September 2022 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. Benesch
M. Benesch
TPT. Perwein
T. Perwein
GAG. Apfaltrer
G. Apfaltrer
TLThorsten Langer
Thorsten Langer
ANAlexander Neumann
Alexander Neumann
BBBrigitte Bison
Brigitte Bison
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffuse glioneuronal tumor with oligodendroglioma-like features and nuclear clusters (DGONC) is a new, molecularly defined glioneuronal CNS tumor type. The objective of the present study was to describe MR imaging and clinical characteristics of patients with DGONC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MR images of 9 patients with DGONC (median age at diagnosis, 9.9 years; range, 4.2–21.8 years) were reviewed. RESULTS: All tumors were located superficially in the frontal/temporal lobes and sharply delineated, displaying little mass effect. Near the circle of Willis, the tumors encompassed the arteries. All except one demonstrated characteristics of low-to-intermediate aggressiveness with high-to-intermediate T2WI and ADC signals and bone remodeling. Most tumors (n = 7) showed a homogeneous ground-glass aspect on T2-weighted and FLAIR images. On the basis of the original histopathologic diagnosis, 6 patients received postsurgical chemo-/radiotherapy, 2 were irradiated after surgery, and 1 patient underwent tumor resection only. At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 10–154 months), 6 patients were alive in a first complete remission and 2 with stable disease 10 and 21 months after diagnosis. The only patient with progressive disease was lost to follow-up. Five-year overall and event-free survival was 100% and 86±13%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This case series presents radiomorphologic characteristics highly predictive of DGONC that contrast with the typical aspects of the original histopathologic diagnoses. This presentation underlines the definition of DGONC as a separate entity, from a clinical perspective. Complete resection may be favorable for long-term disease control in patients with DGONC. The efficacy of nonsurgical treatment modalities should be evaluated in larger series.

1 October 2018 in Klinische Padiatrie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLThorsten Langer
Thorsten Langer
DGDesiree Grabow
Desiree Grabow
PKPeter Kaatsch
Peter Kaatsch
UCUrsula Creutzig
Ursula Creutzig
AEAngelika Eggert
Angelika Eggert
GCGabriele Calaminus
Gabriele Calaminus
Zusammenfassung: Krebskranke Kinder und Jugendliche überleben heute dank Heilungsraten von über 80% viel häufiger ihre Krebserkrankung als vor 40 Jahren. Etwa 33 000 geheilte ehemalige krebskranke Kinder und Jugendliche sind in der Langzeitbeobachtung über das Deutsche Kinderkrebsregister (DKKR) bundesweit erfasst. Heißt geheilt aber auch gesund? Beim Vergleich mit der Normalbevölkerung ist festzustellen, dass die Morbidität und Mortalität bei den ehemaligen Patienten deutlich erhöht ist. Die Krebserkrankungen und deren Behandlungen können bei zwei von drei Überlebenden 30 Jahre später zu therapiebedürftigen Spätfolgen führen, bei etwa einem Drittel werden sie als schwer eingestuft. Mittels einer strukturierten Nachbeobachtung können diese frühzeitig erkannt und bei Bedarf behandelt werden. Ziel dieses Positionspapiers ist eine Aktualisierung des ersten Positionspapiers aus dem Jahre 2007. Hierbei werden die aktuellen Entwicklungen beschrieben und dargestellt, wie geeignete Nachsorgestrukturen und Nachsorgeeinrichtungen – unter Berücksichtigung der bestehenden Strukturen und dem steigenden Bedarf – geplant werden sollten.