Hussein Hamdi

Dr. Hussein Hamdi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2021 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
FAFaisal Albader
Faisal Albader
GSGiorgio Spatola
Giorgio Spatola
VLVirginie Laguitton
Virginie Laguitton
ATAgnes Trebuchon
Agnes Trebuchon
JRJean Regis
Jean Regis

6 August 2019 in Operative Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
GSGiorgio Spatola
Giorgio Spatola
SLStanislas Lagarde
Stanislas Lagarde
AMAileen McGonigal
Aileen McGonigal
APArmando Paz-Paredes
Armando Paz-Paredes
RCRomain Carron
Romain Carron
BACKGROUND: Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for epilepsy and depression. Wrapping the helical electrodes around the nerve can prove technically challenging. However, a quick and efficient method to slightly elevate the nerve can highly facilitate this part of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: To provide useful surgical tips to facilitate the procedure. METHODS: Based on experience of more than 150 adult cases for mainly epilepsy (primary lead implant), the authors share their surgical technique to provide the experienced surgeons or newcomers to the field of VNS with some useful tips. All patients signed informed consent according to the local ethics committee guidelines. RESULTS: The article consists of a detailed step-by-step description of the whole procedure illustrated through high-resolution colored photographs of the surgical field. Special reference is made to the usefulness of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) sponge cubes to elevate the nerve instead of the commonly used silicon vessel loops. CONCLUSION: The use of surgical microscope and PVA sponge cubes to elevate the nerve constitute key points to make VNS an easy surgery.

21 December 2021 in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJean Régis
Jean Régis
LMLouise Merly
Louise Merly
ABAnne Balossier
Anne Balossier
KBKarine Baumstarck
Karine Baumstarck
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
XMXavier Muracciole
Xavier Muracciole
Background: Radiosurgery is performed with a diversity of instruments relying usually either on a stereotactic frame or a mask for patient head fixation. Comfort and safety efficacy of the 2 systems have never been rigorously evaluated and compared. Material and Method: Between February 2016 and January 2017, 58 patients presenting with nonsmall cell lung cancer brain metastases have been treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) with random use of a frame or a mask for fixation were included patients older than 18, with <5 brain metastases (at the exclusion of brainstem and optic pathway’s locations) and no earlier history of radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the pain scale assessment (PSA) at the beginning of the GKS procedure. Results: The PSA at the beginning of the GKS procedure was not different between the 2 groups. The PSA at the day before GKS, before magnetic resonance imaging, just after frame application, and the day after radiosurgery (departure) has shown no difference between the 2 groups. At the end of the radiosurgery itself (just after frame or mask removal) and 1 h after, the mean pain scale was higher in patients treated with the frame (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but 2 patients were not able to tolerate the mask discomfort and had to be treated with frame. Tumor control and morbidity probability were demonstrated to be no difference between the 2 groups in this population of patients with BM not in highly functional area. The median of the extra dose to the body due to the cone-beam computed tomography was 7.5 mGy with a maximum of 35 mGy in patients treated with a mask fixation (null in the others treated with frame). Mask fixation was associated to longer treatment time although the beam on time was not different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: In selected patients, with brain oligo-metastases out of critical location, single-dose mask-based GKS can be done with a comfort and a safety efficacy comparable to frame-based GKS. There seems to be no clear patient data that confirm the value of the mask system with regards to comfort.

1 July 2021 in Epilepsy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
PFPatrizia Ferrante
Patrizia Ferrante
GSGiorgio Spatola
Giorgio Spatola
Wesley ClawsonWesley Clawson
Wesley Clawson
AMAileen McGonigal
Aileen McGonigal
JRJean Regis
Jean Regis

2 March 2023 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
SBSébastien Boissonneau
Sébastien Boissonneau
LVLuc Valton
Luc Valton
AMAileen McGonigal
Aileen McGonigal
FBFabrice Bartolomei
Fabrice Bartolomei
JRJean Regis
Jean Regis
BACKGROUND: Some patients suffering from intractable epileptic seizures, particularly drop attacks (DAs), are nonremediable by curative techniques. Palliative procedure carries a significant rate of surgical and neurological complications. OBJECTIVE: To propose evaluation of safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife corpus callosotomy (GK-CC) as an alternative to microsurgical corpus callosotomy. METHODS: This study included retrospective analysis of 19 patients who underwent GK-CC between 2005 and 2017. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients, 13 (68%) had improvement in seizure control and 6 had no significant improvement. Of the 13/19 (68%) with improvement in seizures, 3 (16%) became completely seizure-free, 2 (11%) became free of DA and generalized tonic-clonic but with residual other seizures, 3 (16%) became free of DA only, and 5 (26%) had >50% reduction in frequency of all seizure types. In the 6 (31%) patients with no appreciable improvement, there were residual untreated commissural fibers and incomplete callosotomy rather than failure of Gamma Knife to disconnect. Seven patients showed a transient mild complication (37% of patients, 33% of the procedures). No permanent complication or neurological consequence was observed during the clinical and radiological workup with a mean of 89 (42-181) months, except 1 patient who had no improvement of epilepsy and then aggravation of the pre-existing cognitive and walking difficulties (Lennox-Gastaut). The median time of improvement after GK-CC was 3 (1-6) months. CONCLUSION: Gamma Knife callosotomy is safe and accurate with comparable efficacy to open callosotomy in this cohort of patients with intractable epilepsy suffering from severe drop attacks.

14 July 2023 in Surgical Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HHHussein Hamdi
Hussein Hamdi
NKNirmeen Adel Adel Kishk
Nirmeen Adel Adel Kishk
RSReham Shamloul
Reham Shamloul
MMMona K. Moawad
Mona K. Moawad
MBMicheal Baghdadi
Micheal Baghdadi
AMAhmed Morsy
Ahmed Morsy
Background: Multidisciplinary pre-surgical evaluation is vital for epilepsy surgery decision and outcomes. Resective epilepsy surgery with assisted monitoring is currently a standard treatment for focal drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). In resource-limited countries, lack of epilepsy surgery center is a huge challenge. We presented and illustrated how to create a multidisciplinary protocol with resource-limited settings in a developing country and epilepsy surgery outcome using brain mapping and monitoring techniques for ensuring satisfactory resection. Methods: We created multicentric incomplete but complementary units covering all epilepsy-related sub-specialties and covering a wide geographical area in our country. Then, we conducted a prospective and multicentric study with low resource settings on patients with focal DRE, who underwent resective epilepsy surgery and were followed up for at least 12 months and were evaluated for postoperative seizure outcome and complications if present. Preoperative comprehensive clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and radiological evaluations were performed by multidisciplinary epilepsy team. Intraoperative brain mapping including awake craniotomy and direct stimulation techniques, neurophysiological monitoring, and electrocorticography was carried out during surgical resection. Results: The study included 47 patients (18 females and 29 males) with mean age 20.4 ± 10.02 years. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients were temporal epilepsy while 25 (53.2%) were extra-temporal epilepsy. The epilepsy surgery outcome at the last follow up was Engel Class I (seizure free) in 35 (74.5%), Class II (almost seizure free) in 8 (17%), Class III (worthwhile improvement) in 3 (6.4%), and Class IV (no worthwhile improvement) in 1 patient (2.1%). Conclusion: With low resource settings and lack of single fully equipped epilepsy center, favorable outcomes after resective surgery in patients with focal DRE could be achieved using careful presurgical multidisciplinary selection, especially with using intraoperative brain mapping and electrocorticography techniques.