Background: Absolute handgrip strength has been correlated with metabolic profile and metabolic disease. Whether relative handgrip strength is also associated with metabolic disease has not been assessed. This study aimed at assessing the association of relative handgrip strength with metabolic profile and metabolic disease in the general population in China. Methods: Data were derived from an ongoing cross-sectional survey of the 2013 National Physical and Health in Shanxi Province, which involved 5520 participants. Multiple linear regression or multiple logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association of absolute/relative handgrip strength with the metabolic profile, preclinical, and established stages of metabolic diseases. Results: This study revealed that relative handgrip strength, that is when normalized to BMI, was associated with: (1) in both genders for more favorable blood lipid levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [males: b = 0.19 (0.15, 0.23); females: b = 0.22 (0.17, 0.28)], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [males: b = −0.14 (−0.23, −0.05); females: b = −0.19 (−0.31, −0.18)], triglycerides [males: b = −0.58 (−0.74, −0.43); females: b = −0.55 (−0.74, −0.36)] and total cholesterol [males: b = −0.20 (−0.31, −0.10); females: b = −0.19 (−0.32, −0.06)]; and better serum glucose levels in males [b = −0.30 (−0.46, −0.15)]. (2) lower risk of impaired fasting glucose in males {third quartile [OR = 0.66 (0.45–0.95)] and fourth quartile [OR = 0.46 (0.30–0.71)] vs. first quartile} and dyslipidemia in both genders {third quartile [males: OR = 0.65 (0.48–0.87); females: OR = 0.68 (0.53–0.86)] and fourth quartile [males: OR = 0.47 (0.35–0.64); females: OR = 0.47(0.36–0.61)] vs. first quartile}. (3) lower risk of hyperlipidemia in both genders third quartile [males: OR = 0.66 (0.50–0.87); females: OR = 0.57 (0.43–0.75)] and fourth quartile [males: OR = 0.35 (0.26–0.47); females: OR = 0.51 (0.38–0.70)] vs. first quartile. However, contrary to relative handgrip strength, higher absolute handgrip strength was associated with unfavorable metabolic profiles and higher risk of metabolic diseases. These paradoxical associations were retained even after adjusted for BMI by employed a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: We conclude that measurement of relative handgrip strength can be used as a reasonable clinical predictor of metabolic health and disease.
Background: Prediabetes has become a pandemic. This study aimed to identify a better predictor for the incidence of prediabetes, which we hypothesize to be the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a simplified insulin resistance index. We compared its predictive value with the other common risk factors of prediabetes. Methods: The participants of this analysis were derived from the Risk Evaluation of cAncers in Chinese diabeTic Individuals: a lONgitudinal (REACTION) study. A total of 4543 participants without initial prediabetes or diabetes were followed up for 3.25 years. Using multivariate logistic regression model, the associations between baseline obesity, lipid profiles and non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices with the incidence of prediabetes were analyzed. To assess which is better predictor for the incidence of prediabetes, the area under curves (AUCs) calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to evaluate and compare with the predictive value of the different indices. Results: During the 3.25 years, 1071 out of the 4543 participants developed prediabetes. Using the logistic regression analysis adjusted for some potential confounders, the risk of incidence of prediabetes increased 1.38 (1.28–1.48) fold for each 1–SD increment of TyG index. The predictive ability (assessed by AUCs) of TyG index for predicting prediabetes was 0.60 (0.58–0.62), which was superior to the indices of obesity, lipid profiles and other non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices. Although the predictive ability of the TyG index was overall similar to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (P = 0.4340), TyG index trended higher than FPG in females (0.62 (0.59–0.64) vs. 0.59 (0.57–0.61), P = 0.0872) and obese subjects (0.59 (0.57–0.62) vs. 0.57 (0.54–0.59), P = 0.1313). TyG index had superior predictive ability for the prediabetic phenotype with isolated impaired glucose tolerance compared with FPG (P < 0.05) and other indices. Furthermore, TyG index significantly improved the C statistic (0.62 (0.60–0.64)), integrated discrimination improvement (1.89% (1.44–2.33%)) and net reclassification index (28.76% (21.84–35.67%)) of conventional model in predicting prediabetes than other indices. Conclusions: TyG could be a potential predictor to identify the high risk individuals of prediabetes.
Aims: This study aimed to examine the association of different anatomical forms of obesity with adipose tissue insulin resistance and to assess the diagnostic value and contribution of obesity to adipose tissue insulin resistance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 499 subjects aged 50 years or over. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to clarify the association of different forms of obesity with adipose tissue insulin resistance (calculated as fasting insulin level×fasting free fatty acids level). Receiver operating characteristic cure analyses were used to assess the diagnostic value of each anthropometric indicator for adipose tissue insulin resistance. Attributable risk per cent and population attributable risk per cent were calculated to assess the contribution of obesity to adipose tissue insulin resistance. Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, we showed that anthropometric indicators were all positively associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance. In males, waist circumference (WC) was the strongest associated factor (OR, 3.43 (95% CI 2.03 to 5.82)) and indicator (area under the curve (AUC): 0.79) of adipose tissue insulin resistance among those indicators. Here, abdominal obesity (WC≥90 cm) accounted for 64.9% of adipose tissue insulin resistance in the abdominal obese males. Accordingly, body mass index (BMI) was the strongest associated factor (OR,3.08 (95% CI 2.04 to 4.66)) and indicator (AUC: 0.78) of adipose tissue insulin resistance in females. Here, general obesity of BMI≥25 kg/m2 accounted for 66.2% of the adipose tissue insulin resistance in the general obese females. We further demonstrated that adipose tissue insulin resistance was associated or trended to be associated with the metabolic diseases of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and fatty liver in subjects with normal BMI and WC. Conclusions: Maintaining WC in males and BMI in females to a normal range could be an important strategy to significantly reduce the occurrence of adipose tissue insulin resistance and the subsequent metabolic diseases.
5 March 2024 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Background: The association of the severity of hepatic steatosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)/metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the remission of MAFLD/MASLD with CKD occurrence is unclear. Methods and Results: The study enrolled 79 540 participants from the Kailuan cohort. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed by ultrasound. MAFLD/MASLD was defined as hepatic steatosis combined with metabolic dysfunction and MASLD further excluded alcohol or other causes of liver disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate<60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 or positive proteinuria (≥1+). Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox regression models. After a median follow‐up of 12.9 years, CKD occurred in 20 465 participants. After adjusting for potential confounders, MAFLD was associated with a higher risk of CKD compared with non‐MAFLD (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09–1.16]), and this risk increased with increasing severity of hepatic steatosis ( P ‐trend<0.001). Consistent findings were observed when MASLD was used as the exposure. Compared with persistent non‐MAFLD, no statistical difference was found in the risk of CKD in MAFLD remission (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.95–1.15]); however, MASLD remission still had a higher risk of CKD compared with persistent non‐MASLD (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.03–1.27]). When grouped according to the prior severity of hepatic steatosis, there was no statistically significant difference in risk of CKD in mild‐MAFLD/MASLD remission compared with persistent non‐MAFLD/MASLD, but moderated/severe‐MAFLD/MASLD remission still had a higher risk. Conclusions: The risk of CKD in patients with MAFLD/MASLD increased with the severity of hepatic steatosis. Even after remission of the disease, patients with MAFLD/MASLD with prior moderate to severe hepatic steatosis still had a higher risk of CKD.
9 November 2018 in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Context Elevated blood triglyceride levels are known to increase the risk of diabetes and prediabetes. However, it is still unclear whether elevated triglyceride levels are associated with inadequate glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Objective To investigate the association between elevated triglyceride levels and inadequate glycemic control among insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Patients We recruited 20,108 type 2 diabetic patients who were treated with a sufficient dose of insulin. These patients were from the 2013 China National HbA1c Surveillance System study, which was a multi-center study conducted in Mainland China. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the association of the triglyceride level with the inadequate glycemic control. Results Overall, 56.0% of the included study subjects had elevated triglyceride levels (≥1.70mmol/L), and prevalence of HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) was 67.2% and 83.4%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios of HbA1c ≥7.0% were 1.06 (0.98-1.15), 1.35 (1.23-1.48) and 3.12 (2.76-3.53), respectively, for those with triglyceride levels in ranges of 1.70-2.29, 2.30-3.39 and ≥3.40 mmol/L compared to those with triglyceride levels of <1.70 mmol/L. There was a similar association between triglyceride levels and HbA1c ≥6.5%. This positive association was confirmed by subgroup analyses among different subpopulations. There was also a strong nonlinear dose-response relationship between the triglyceride level and inadequate glycemic control. Conclusions Elevated triglyceride levels were strongly associated with inadequate glycemic control, thus suppressing triglyceride levels might benefit in attaining a more optimal glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
Background: Sepsis is a main cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The epidemiology of sepsis in high-income countries is well-known, but information on sepsis in middle- or low-income countries is still deficient, especially in China. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill patients in tertiary hospitals in China.Methods: A multicenter prospective observational cohort study was performed with consecutively collected data from adults who stayed in any intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 h; data were collected from 1 January 2014 to 31 August 2015, and patients were followed until death or discharge from the hospital.Results: A total of 4,910 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 2,086 (42.5%) presented with sepsis or septic shock on admission to the ICU or within the first 48 h after admission to the ICU. ICU mortality was higher in patients with sepsis (13.1%) and septic shock (39.0%) and varied according to geographical region. Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Staphylococcus infections were associated with increased ICU mortality. In addition, age, Acute Physiology, and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, malignant tumors, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and septic shock were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with sepsis. The prompt administration of antibiotics (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.92) and 30 mL/kg of initial fluid resuscitation during the first 3 h (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30–0.63) improved the outcome in patients with septic shock.Conclusions: Sepsis was common and was associated with a high mortality rate in critically ill patients in tertiary hospitals in China. The prompt administration of antibiotics and 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation decreased the risk of mortality.