Danielle Scharp

Dr. Danielle Scharp

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 December 2022 in International Journal of Medical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMollie Hobensack
Mollie Hobensack
JSJiyoun Song
Jiyoun Song
DSDanielle Scharp
Danielle Scharp
KBKathryn H. Bowles
Kathryn H. Bowles
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz

18 April 2023 in Nursing Inquiry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VMVeronica Barcelona De Mendoza
Veronica Barcelona De Mendoza
DSDanielle Scharp
Danielle Scharp
BIBetina R. Idnay
Betina R. Idnay
HMHans Moen
Hans Moen
DGDena Goffman
Dena Goffman
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz
The presence of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record (EHR) has been used to measure implicit biases that underlie health inequities. The purpose of this study was to identify the presence of stigmatizing language in the clinical notes of pregnant people during the birth admission. We conducted a qualitative analysis on N = 1117 birth admission EHR notes from two urban hospitals in 2017. We identified stigmatizing language categories, such as Disapproval (39.3%), Questioning patient credibility (37.7%), Difficult patient (21.3%), Stereotyping (1.6%), and Unilateral decisions (1.6%) in 61 notes (5.4%). We also defined a new stigmatizing language category indicating Power/privilege. This was present in 37 notes (3.3%) and signaled approval of social status, upholding a hierarchy of bias. The stigmatizing language was most frequently identified in birth admission triage notes (16%) and least frequently in social work initial assessments (13.7%). We found that clinicians from various disciplines recorded stigmatizing language in the medical records of birthing people. This language was used to question birthing people's credibility and convey disapproval of decision‐making abilities for themselves or their newborns. We reported a Power/privilege language bias in the inconsistent documentation of traits considered favorable for patient outcomes (e.g., employment status). Future work on stigmatizing language may inform tailored interventions to improve perinatal outcomes for all birthing people and their families.

11 October 2023 in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDanielle Scharp
Danielle Scharp
MHMollie Hobensack
Mollie Hobensack
ADAnahita Davoudi
Anahita Davoudi
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz

19 November 2024 in Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMVeronica Barcelona De Mendoza
Veronica Barcelona De Mendoza
JSJihye K. Scroggins
Jihye K. Scroggins
DSDanielle Scharp
Danielle Scharp
SHSarah E. Harkins
Sarah E. Harkins
DGDena Goffman
Dena Goffman
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz

7 November 2024 in Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SCSena Chae
Sena Chae
ADAnahita Davoudi
Anahita Davoudi
JSJiyoun Song
Jiyoun Song
LELauren Evans
Lauren Evans
KBKathryn H. Bowles
Kathryn H. Bowles
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz
Background: The healthcare industry increasingly values high‐quality and personalized care. Patients with heart failure (HF) receiving home health care (HHC) often experience hospitalizations due to worsening symptoms and comorbidities. Therefore, close symptom monitoring and timely intervention based on risk prediction could help HHC clinicians prevent emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. This study aims to (1) describe important variables associated with a higher risk of ED visits and hospitalizations in HF patients receiving HHC; (2) map data requirements of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool to the exchangeable data standard for integrating a CDS tool into the care of patients with HF; (3) outline a pipeline for developing a real‐time artificial intelligence (AI)‐based CDS tool.Methods: We used patient data from a large HHC organization in the Northeastern US to determine the factors that can predict ED visits and hospitalizations among patients with HF in HHC (9362 patients in 12,223 care episodes). We examined vital signs, HHC visit details (e.g., the purpose of the visit), and clinical note–derived variables. The study identified critical factors that can predict ED visits and hospitalizations and used these findings to suggest a practical CDS tool for nurses. The tool's proposed design includes a system that can analyze data quickly to offer timely advice to healthcare clinicians.Results: Our research showed that the length of time since a patient was admitted to HHC and how recently they have shown symptoms of HF were significant factors predicting an adverse event. Additionally, we found this information from the last few HHC visits before the occurrence of an ED visit or hospitalization were particularly important in the prediction. One hundred percent of clinical demographic profiles from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set variables were mapped to the exchangeable data standard, while natural language processing–driven variables couldn't be mapped due to their nature, as they are generated from unstructured data. The suggested CDS tool alerts nurses about newly emerging or rising risks, helping them make informed decisions.Conclusions: This study discusses the creation of a time‐series risk prediction model and its potential CDS applications within HHC, aiming to enhance patient outcomes, streamline resource utilization, and improve the quality of care for individuals with HF.Clinical Relevance: This study provides a detailed plan for a CDS tool that uses the latest AI technology designed to aid nurses in their day‐to‐day HHC service. Our proposed CDS tool includes an alert system that serves as a guard rail to prevent ED visits and hospitalizations. This tool can potentially improve how nurses make decisions and improve patient outcomes by providing early warnings about ED visits and hospitalizations.

19 August 2023 in Geriatric Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDanielle Scharp
Danielle Scharp
SHSarah E. Harkins
Sarah E. Harkins
MTMaxim Topaz
Maxim Topaz