Haris Iqbal Sair

Dr. Haris Iqbal Sair

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSarthak Pati
Sarthak Pati
Ujjwal BaidUjjwal Baid
Ujjwal Baid
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
MSMicah Sheller
Micah Sheller
SWShih-Han Wang
Shih-Han Wang
Spyridon BakasSpyridon Bakas
Spyridon Bakas
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise across disciplines, out-of-sample generalizability is concerning. This is currently addressed by sharing multi-site data, but such centralization is challenging/infeasible to scale due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable ML, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 sites across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, reporting the largest such dataset in the literature (n = 6, 314). We demonstrate a 33% delineation improvement for the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% for the complete tumor extent, over a publicly trained model. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more healthcare studies informed by large diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further analyses for glioblastoma by releasing our consensus model, and 3) demonstrate the FL effectiveness at such scale and task-complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data-sharing.

31 August 2017 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBD.F. Black
D.F. Black
BVB. Vachha
B. Vachha
AMA. Mian
A. Mian
SFS.H. Faro
S.H. Faro
MMM. Maheshwari
M. Maheshwari
KWK. Welker
K. Welker
INTRODUCTION: Functional MR imaging is increasingly being used for presurgical language assessment in the treatment of patients with brain tumors, epilepsy, vascular malformations, and other conditions. The inherent complexity of fMRI, which includes numerous processing steps and selective analyses, is compounded by institution-unique approaches to patient training, paradigm choice, and an eclectic array of postprocessing options from various vendors. Consequently, institutions perform fMRI in such markedly different manners that data sharing, comparison, and generalization of results are difficult. The American Society of Functional Neuroradiology proposes widespread adoption of common fMRI language paradigms as the first step in countering this lost opportunity to advance our knowledge and improve patient care. LANGUAGE PARADIGM REVIEW PROCESS: A taskforce of American Society of Functional Neuroradiology members from multiple institutions used a broad literature review, member polls, and expert opinion to converge on 2 sets of standard language paradigms that strike a balance between ease of application and clinical usefulness. ASFNR RECOMMENDATIONS: The taskforce generated an adult language paradigm algorithm for presurgical language assessment including the following tasks: Sentence Completion, Silent Word Generation, Rhyming, Object Naming, and/or Passive Story Listening. The pediatric algorithm includes the following tasks: Sentence Completion, Rhyming, Antonym Generation, or Passive Story Listening. DISCUSSION: Convergence of fMRI language paradigms across institutions offers the first step in providing a “Rosetta Stone” that provides a common reference point with which to compare and contrast the usefulness and reliability of fMRI data. From this common language task battery, future refinements and improvements are anticipated, particularly as objective measures of reliability become available. Some commonality of practice is a necessary first step to develop a foundation on which to improve the clinical utility of this field.

10 December 2015 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHaris Iqbal Sair
Haris Iqbal Sair
NYNoushin Yahyavi‐Firouz‐Abadi
Noushin Yahyavi‐Firouz‐Abadi
VCVince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun
RARaag D. Airan
Raag D. Airan
SAShruti Agarwal
Shruti Agarwal
JPJay J Pillai
Jay J Pillai

1 March 2020 in The Knee
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PYPaul Hyunsoo Yi
Paul Hyunsoo Yi
JWJinchi Wei
Jinchi Wei
TKTae Kyung Kim
Tae Kyung Kim
HSHaris Iqbal Sair
Haris Iqbal Sair
FHFerdinand K. Hui
Ferdinand K. Hui
JOJulius K. Oni
Julius K. Oni

25 March 2016 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARaag D. Airan
Raag D. Airan
JVJoshua T. Vogelstein
Joshua T. Vogelstein
JPJay J Pillai
Jay J Pillai
BCBrian Caffo
Brian Caffo
JPJames J. Pekar
James J. Pekar
HSHaris Iqbal Sair
Haris Iqbal Sair
Much recent attention has been paid to quantifying anatomic and functional neuroimaging on the individual subject level. For optimal individual subject characterization, specific acquisition and analysis features need to be identified that maximize interindividual variability while concomitantly minimizing intra‐subject variability. We delineate the effect of various acquisition parameters (length of acquisition, sampling frequency) and analysis methods (time course extraction, region of interest parcellation, and thresholding of connectivity‐derived network graphs) on characterizing individual subject differentiation. We utilize a non‐parametric statistical metric that quantifies the degree to which a parameter set allows this individual subject differentiation by both maximizing interindividual variance and minimizing intra‐individual variance. We apply this metric to analysis of four publicly available test‐retest resting‐state fMRI (rs‐fMRI) data sets. We find that for the question of maximizing individual differentiation, (i) for increasing sampling, there is a relative tradeoff between increased sampling frequency and increased acquisition time; (ii) for the sizes of the interrogated data sets, only 3‐4 min of acquisition time was sufficient to maximally differentiate each subject with an algorithm that utilized no a priori information regarding subject identification; and (iii) brain regions that most contribute to this individual subject characterization lie in the default mode, attention, and executive control networks. These findings may guide optimal rs‐fMRI experiment design and may elucidate the neural bases for subject‐to‐subject differences. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1986–1997, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1 June 2022 in Journal Of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOmid Shafaat
Omid Shafaat
JBJoshua Bernstock
Joshua Bernstock
ASAmir Shafaat
Amir Shafaat
VYVivek Yedavalli
Vivek Yedavalli
GEGalal Elsayed
Galal Elsayed
HSHouman Sotoudeh
Houman Sotoudeh