Sun-induced Fluorescence (SIF) and Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) data were collected in the field over maize to study their diurnal responses to different water stresses at the canopy scale. An automated field spectroscopy system was used to obtain continuous and long-term measurements of maize canopy in four field plots with different irrigation treatments. This system collects visible to near-infrared spectra with a spectrometer, which provides a sub-nanometer spectral resolution in the spectral range of 480~850 nm. The red SIF (F_R) and far red SIF (F_FR) data were retrieved by Spectral Fitting Methods (SFM) in the $O_2$ -A band and $O_2$ -B band, respectively. In addition to PRI, $\Delta \mathrm{PRI}$ values were derived from PRI by subtracting an early morning PRI value. Photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) data, the canopy fraction of absorbed PAR (fPAR), and the air/canopy temperature and photosystem II operating efficiency (YII) at the leaf scale were collected concurrently. In this paper, the diurnal dynamics of each parameter before and after watering at the jointing stage were compared. The results showed that (i) both F_R and F_FR decreased under water stress, but F_R always peaked at noon, and the peak of F_FR advanced with the increase in stress. Leaf folding and the increase in Non-photochemical Quenching (NPQ) are the main reasons for this trend. Leaf YII gradually decreased from 8:00 to 14:00 and then recovered. In drought, leaf YII was smaller and decreased more rapidly. Therefore, the fluorescence yield at both the leaf and canopy scale responded to water stress. (ii) As good indicators of changes in NPQ, diurnal PRI and $\Delta \mathrm{PRI}$ data also showed specific decreases due to water stress. $\Delta \mathrm{PRI}$ can eliminate the impact of canopy structure. Under water stress, $\Delta \mathrm{PRI}$ decreased rapidly from 8:00 to 13:00, and the maximum range of this decrease was approximately 0.05. After 13:00, their values started to increase but could not recover to their morning level. (iii) Higher canopy-air temperature differences ( $\Delta \mathrm{T}$ ) indicate that stomatal closure leads to an increase in leaf temperature, which maintains a higher state in the afternoon. In summary, to cope with water stress, both leaf folding and changes in physiology are activated. To monitor drought, SIF performs best around midday, and PRI is better after noon.

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the early water stress in maize using leaf-level measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence and temperature. In this study, a series of diurnal measurements, such as leaf chlorophyll fluorescence (Fs), leaf spectrum, temperature and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), were conducted for maize during gradient watering and filled watering experiments. Fraunhofer Line Discriminator methods (FLD and 3FLD) were used to obtain fluorescence from leaves spectrum. This simulated work using the SCOPE model demonstrated the variations in fluorescence and temperature in stress levels expressed by different stress factors. In the field measurement, the gradient experiment revealed that chlorophyll fluorescence decreased for plants with water stress relative to well-water plants and T_leaf-T_air increased; the filled watering experiment stated that chlorophyll fluorescence of maize under water stress were similar to those of maize under well-watering condition. In addition, the relationships between the Fs, retrieved fluorescence, T_leaf-T_air and water content were analyzed. The Fs determination resulted to the best coefficients of determination for the normalized retrieved fluorescence FLD/PAR (R² = 0.54), T_leaf-T_air (R² = 0.48) and water content (R² = 0.71). The normalized retrieved fluorescence yielded a good coefficient of determination for T_leaf-T_air (R² = 0.48). This study demonstrated that chlorophyll fluorescence could reflect variations in the physiological states of plants during early water stress, and leaf temperature confirmed the chlorophyll fluorescence analysis results and improved the accuracy of the water stress detection.

Accurately quantifying gross primary production (GPP) is of vital importance to understanding the global carbon cycle. Light-use efficiency (LUE) models and process-based models have been widely used to estimate GPP at different spatial and temporal scales. However, large uncertainties remain in quantifying GPP, especially for croplands. Recently, remote measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have provided a new perspective to assess actual levels of plant photosynthesis. In the presented study, we evaluated the performance of three approaches, including the LUE-based multi-source data synergized quantitative (MuSyQ) GPP algorithm, the process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator (BEPS) model, and the SIF-based statistical model, in estimating the diurnal courses of GPP at a maize site in Zhangye, China. A field campaign was conducted to acquire synchronous far-red SIF (SIF₇₆₀) observations and flux tower-based GPP measurements. Our results showed that both SIF₇₆₀ and GPP were linearly correlated with APAR, and the SIF₇₆₀-GPP relationship was adequately characterized using a linear function. The evaluation of the modeled GPP against the GPP measured from the tower demonstrated that all three approaches provided reasonable estimates, with R² values of 0.702, 0.867, and 0.667 and RMSE values of 0.247, 0.153, and 0.236 mg m⁻² s⁻¹ for the MuSyQ-GPP, BEPS and SIF models, respectively. This study indicated that the BEPS model simulated the GPP best due to its efficiency in describing the underlying physiological processes of sunlit and shaded leaves. The MuSyQ-GPP model was limited by its simplification of some critical ecological processes and its weakness in characterizing the contribution of shaded leaves. The SIF₇₆₀-based model demonstrated a relatively limited accuracy but showed its potential in modeling GPP without dependency on climate inputs in short-term studies.

Leaf area index (LAI) is an important biophysical parameter and the retrieval of LAI from remote sensing data is the only feasible method for generating LAI products at regional and global scales. However, most LAI retrieval methods use satellite observations at a specific time to retrieve LAI. Because of the impacts of clouds and aerosols, the LAI products generated by these methods are spatially incomplete and temporally discontinuous, and thus they cannot meet the needs of practical applications. To generate high-quality LAI products, four machine learning algorithms, including back-propagation neutral network (BPNN), radial basis function networks (RBFNs), general regression neutral networks (GRNNs), and multi-output support vector regression (MSVR) are proposed to retrieve LAI from time-series Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance data in this study and performance of these machine learning algorithms is evaluated. The results demonstrated that GRNNs, RBFNs, and MSVR exhibited low sensitivity to training sample size, whereas BPNN had high sensitivity. The four algorithms performed slightly better with red, near infrared (NIR), and short wave infrared (SWIR) bands than red and NIR bands, and the results were significantly better than those obtained using single band reflectance data (red or NIR). Regardless of band composition, GRNNs performed better than the other three methods. Among the four algorithms, BPNN required the least training time, whereas MSVR needed the most for any sample size.

The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) is a key variable in the model of vegetation productivity. Vegetation indices (VIs) that were derived from instantaneous remote-sensing data have been successfully used to estimate the FPAR of a day or a longer period. However, it has not yet been verified whether continuous VIs can be used to accurately estimate the diurnal dynamics of a vegetation canopy FPAR, which may fluctuate dramatically within a day. In this study, we measured the high temporal resolution spectral data (480 to 850 nm) and FPAR data of a maize canopy from the jointing stage to the tasseling stage under different irrigation and illumination conditions using two automatic observation systems. To estimate the FPAR, we developed regression models based on a quadratic function using 13 kinds of VIs. The results show the following: (1) Under nondrought conditions, although the illumination condition (sunny or cloudy) influenced the trend of the canopy diurnal FPAR, it had only a slight effect on the model accuracies of the FPAR-VIs. The maximum coefficients of determination (R²) of the FPAR-VIs models generated for the sunny nondrought data, the cloudy nondrought data, and all of the nondrought data were 0.895, 0.88, and 0.828, respectively. The VIs—including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), green NDVI (GNDVI), red-edge simple ratio (SR₇₀₅), modified simple ratio 2 (mSR2), red-edge normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI₇₀₅), and enhanced vegetation index (EVI)—that were related to the canopy structure had higher estimation accuracies (R² > 0.8) than the other VIs that were related to the soil adjustment, chlorophyll, and physiology. The estimation accuracies of the GNDVI and some red-edge VIs (including NDVI₇₀₅, SR₇₀₅, and mSR2) were higher than the estimation accuracy of the NDVI. (2) Under drought stress, the FPAR decreased significantly because of leaf wilting and the effective leaf area index decrease around noon. When we included drought data in the model, accuracies were reduced dramatically and the R² value of the best model was only 0.59. When we built the regression models based only on drought data, the EVI, which can weaken the influence of soil, had the best estimate accuracy (R² = 0.68).