Charlotte Zuur

Charlotte Zuur


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJoris L. Vos
Joris L. Vos
JEJoris B. W. Elbers
Joris B. W. Elbers
OKOscar Krijgsman
Oscar Krijgsman
JTJoleen J. H. Traets
Joleen J. H. Traets
XQXiaohang Qiao
Xiaohang Qiao
CZCharlotte Zuur
Charlotte Zuur
Surgery for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in 30‒50% five-year overall survival. In IMCISION (NCT03003637), a non-randomized phase Ib/IIa trial, 32 HNSCC patients are treated with 2 doses (in weeks 1 and 3) of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using nivolumab (NIVO MONO, n = 6, phase Ib arm A) or nivolumab plus a single dose of ipilimumab (COMBO, n = 26, 6 in phase Ib arm B, and 20 in phase IIa) prior to surgery. Primary endpoints are feasibility to resect no later than week 6 (phase Ib) and primary tumor pathological response (phase IIa). Surgery is not delayed or suspended for any patient in phase Ib, meeting the primary endpoint. Grade 3‒4 immune-related adverse events are seen in 2 of 6 (33%) NIVO MONO and 10 of 26 (38%) total COMBO patients. Pathological response, defined as the %-change in primary tumor viable tumor cell percentage from baseline biopsy to on-treatment resection, is evaluable in 17/20 phase IIa patients and 29/32 total trial patients (6/6 NIVO MONO, 23/26 COMBO). We observe a major pathological response (MPR, 90‒100% response) in 35% of patients after COMBO ICB, both in phase IIa (6/17) and in the whole trial (8/23), meeting the phase IIa primary endpoint threshold of 10%. NIVO MONO’s MPR rate is 17% (1/6). None of the MPR patients develop recurrent HSNCC during 24.0 months median postsurgical follow-up. FDG-PET-based total lesion glycolysis identifies MPR patients prior to surgery. A baseline AID/APOBEC-associated mutational profile and an on-treatment decrease in hypoxia RNA signature are observed in MPR patients. Our data indicate that neoadjuvant COMBO ICB is feasible and encouragingly efficacious in HNSCC.

24 August 2023 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JVJoris L. Vos
Joris L. Vos
BBBharat Burman
Bharat Burman
SJSwati Jain
Swati Jain
CFConall W. R. Fitzgerald
Conall W. R. Fitzgerald
ESEric J. Sherman
Eric J. Sherman
LMLuc Morris
Luc Morris

7 August 2023 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAnne M. van der Leun
Anne M. van der Leun
JTJoleen J.H. Traets
Joleen J.H. Traets
JVJoris L. Vos
Joris L. Vos
JEJoris B.W. Elbers
Joris B.W. Elbers
SPSanne Patiwael
Sanne Patiwael
CZCharlotte Zuur
Charlotte Zuur
To dissect the effect of neoadjuvant PD-1 and CTLA4 blockade on intratumoral T cells in treatment-naive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, we analyzed primary tumor immune infiltrates from responding and nonresponding patients. At baseline, a higher ratio between active (4-1BB/OX40+) and inactive regulatory CD4+ T cells was associated with immunotherapy response. Furthermore, upon therapy, this active regulatory T-cell (Treg) population showed a profound decrease in responding patients. In an analogous process, intratumoral dysfunctional CD8+ T cells displayed decreased expression of activity and dysfunction-related genes in responding patients, whereas in clinical nonresponders, natural killer cells showed an increased cytotoxic profile early upon treatment. These data reveal immunologic changes in response to dual PD-1/CTLA4 blockade, including a parallel remodeling of presumed tumor-reactive Treg and CD8+ T-cell compartments in responding patients, and indicate that the presence of activated Tregs at baseline may be associated with response. Significance: In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant PD-1/CTLA4 blockade has shown substantial response rates (20%–35%). As recognition of tumor antigens by T cells appears to be a critical driver of therapy response, a better understanding of alterations in T-cell state that are associated with response and resistance is of importance. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2109

1 June 2012 in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEleonoor A. R. Theunissen
Eleonoor A. R. Theunissen
ATAdriana J. Timmermans
Adriana J. Timmermans
CZCharlotte Zuur
Charlotte Zuur
OHOlga Hamming-Vrieze
Olga Hamming-Vrieze
JBJan Paul de Boer
Jan Paul de Boer
Michiel Van den BrekelMichiel Van den Brekel
Michiel Van den Brekel
Radiotherapy (RT), either as a single-modality treatment or as an adjuvant to surgery, plays a central role in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer.1 In advanced head and neck cancer, in the last 2 decades RT increasingly has been combined with chemotherapy (CT) (mainly cisplatin based), which either has been added as induction before radiation or has been administered concurrently. This treatment has led to improvements in locoregional control and overall survival in many head and neck cancer sites, especially in oropharyngeal cancer, with improvement between 8% and 15%.2 Nowadays, therefore, organ preservation cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has become the treatment of choice for anatomically and functionally inoperable advanced-stage cancer of the head and neck, probably with the exception of stage IV laryngeal cancer.3,4

23 January 2019 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJoris B. W. Elbers
Joris B. W. Elbers
LVLars I. Veldhuis
Lars I. Veldhuis
PBPatrick A. Bhairosing
Patrick A. Bhairosing
LSLudi E. Smeele
Ludi E. Smeele
KJKatarzyna Jóźwiak
Katarzyna Jóźwiak
CZCharlotte Zuur
Charlotte Zuur

21 March 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAlberto Gil-Jimenez
Alberto Gil-Jimenez
NDNick van Dijk
Nick van Dijk
JVJoris L. Vos
Joris L. Vos
YLYoni Lubeck
Yoni Lubeck
MMMaurits L. van Montfoort
Maurits L. van Montfoort
LWLodewyk F. A. Wessels
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can achieve remarkable responses in urothelial cancer (UC), which may depend on tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics. However, the relationship between the TME, usually characterized by immune cell density, and response to ICI is unclear. Here, we quantify the TME immune cell densities and spatial relationships (SRs) of 24 baseline UC samples, obtained before pre-operative combination ICI treatment, using multiplex immunofluorescence. We describe SRs by approximating the first nearest-neighbor distance distribution with a Weibull distribution and evaluate the association between TME metrics and ipilimumab+nivolumab response. Immune cell density does not discriminate between response groups. However, the Weibull SR metrics of CD8+ T cells or macrophages to their closest cancer cell positively associate with response. CD8+ T cells close to B cells are characteristic of non-response. We validate our SR response associations in a combination ICI cohort of head and neck tumors. Our data confirm that SRs, in contrast to density metrics, are strong biomarkers of response to pre-operative combination ICIs.