Stress contributes to various aspects of malignancy and could influence survival in laryngeal cancer patients. Among antioxidant mechanisms, zinc and the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase 2, catalase and glutathione peroxidase 1 play a major role. The aim of this study was a prospective evaluation of the survival of patients with laryngeal cancer in relation to serum levels of zinc in combination with functional genotype differences of three key antioxidant enzymes. The study group consisted of 300 patients treated surgically for laryngeal cancer. Serum zinc levels and common polymorphisms in SOD2, CAT and GPX1 were analyzed. The risk of death in patients with the lowest zinc levels was increased in comparison with patients with the highest levels. Polymorphisms of antioxidant genes by themselves were not correlated with survival, however, serum zinc level impact on survival was stronger for SOD2 TC/TT and CAT CC variants. GPX1 polymorphisms did not correlate with zinc levels regarding survival. In conclusion, serum zinc concentration appears to be an important prognostic factor for survival of patients diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. When higher zinc levels were correlated with polymorphisms in SOD2 and CAT a further increase in survival was observed.

Background: There are several genes associated with ovarian cancer risk. Molecular changes in borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) indicate linkage of this disease to type I ovarian tumors (low-grade ovarian carcinomas). This study determined the prevalence and association of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and CHEK2 with the risk of BOTs. Methods: The study group consisted of 102 patients with histologically confirmed BOT and 1743 healthy controls. In addition, 167 cases with ovarian cancer G1 were analyzed. The analyses included genotyping of 21 founder and recurrent mutations localized in 5 genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and CHEK2). The risk for developing BOT and low-grade ovarian cancer, as well as the association of tested mutations with survival, was estimated. Results: The CHEK2 missense mutation (c.470T>C) was associated with 2-times increased risk of BOT (OR=2.05, p=0.03), at an earlier age at diagnosis and about 10% worse rate of a 10-year survival. Mutations in BRCA1 and PALB2 were associated with a high risk of ovarian cancer G1 (OR=8.53, p=0.005 and OR=7.03, p=0.03, respectively) and were related to worse all-cause survival for BRCA1 carriers (HR=4.73, 95%CI 1.45–15.43, p=0.01). Conclusions: Results suggest that CHEK2 (c.470T>C) may possibly play a role in the pathogenesis of BOT, but due to the low number of BOT patients, obtained results should be considered as preliminary. Larger more in-depth studies are required.

The aim of the study was to analyze the frequency and magnitude of association of 21 recurrent founder germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and CHEK2 genes with ovarian cancer risk among unselected patients in Poland. We genotyped 21 recurrent germline mutations in BRCA1 (9 mutations), BRCA2 (4 mutations), RAD51C (3 mutations), PALB2 (2 mutations), and CHEK2 (3 mutations) among 2270 Polish ovarian cancer patients and 1743 healthy controls, and assessed the odds ratios (OR) for developing ovarian cancer for each gene. Mutations were detected in 369 out of 2095 (17.6%) unselected ovarian cancer cases and 117 out of 1743 (6.7%) unaffected controls. The ovarian cancer risk was associated with mutations in BRCA1 (OR = 40.79, 95% CI: 18.67–114.78; p = 0.29 × 10⁻¹⁵), in BRCA2 (OR = 25.98; 95% CI: 1.55–434.8; p = 0.001), in RAD51C (OR = 6.28; 95% CI 1.77–39.9; p = 0.02), and in PALB2 (OR 3.34; 95% CI: 1.06–14.68; p = 0.06). There was no association found for CHEK2. We found that pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C or PALB2 are responsible for 12.5% of unselected cases of ovarian cancer. We recommend that all women with ovarian cancer in Poland and first-degree female relatives should be tested for this panel of 18 mutations.

Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, including breast cancer. However, the risk varies by other environmental and genetic factors present in carriers of mutation. To understand the value of these factors more clearly, a number of common genetic susceptibility variants have been studied through genome-wide association studies as potential genetic risk modifiers for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants carriers. Several studies have identified specific polymorphisms that may influence the risk of breast cancer development, either by increasing or reducing susceptibility. These variants are implicated in biological pathways such as DNA damage repair, hormonal regulation or cell proliferation. The identification and understanding of key genetic modifiers may provide valuable insights into development of personalized prevention, targeted therapies and screening strategies for high-risk individuals. This review presents the overview of known genetic risk modifiers for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, their potential impact on risk, and their functional roles. Furthermore, it highlights the need for further research directions, including understanding the biological role of genetic modifiers in cancer development and the refinement of risk assessment models.

The article presents the current state of knowledge on genetic modifiers of ovarian cancer risk in women carrying pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are major contributors to hereditary susceptibility to this malignancy. Although PV carriers have high disease penetrance (BRCA1: ~40% and BRCA2: 11–27%), substantial variability in individual risk is observed, suggesting the influence of additional genetic variants. Background: Ovarian cancer is characterized by late detection and high mortality, and a significant portion of risk among BRCA1/2 carriers is shaped by reproductive and environmental factors as well as genetic modifiers. The article emphasizes that carriers of the same BRCA PV can exhibit markedly different risk levels depending on additional variants that modulate key biological processes, such as DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis. Methods: A systematic literature search covering the years 1996–2025 was conducted in the PubMed database. Initially, 734 publications were identified; after removing duplicates, thematically irrelevant articles, non-full-text papers, and studies not meeting the inclusion criteria, 47 articles were included in the review. These studies covered candidate gene analyses, GWAS, and data from the CIMBA consortium, which enables the examination of large cohorts of PV carriers. Results: The review identified numerous variants associated with increased or decreased ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers, including the following: OGG1, DR4, MDM2, CYP2A7, CASP8, ITGB3, HRAS1, TRIM61, and MTHFR. The reviewed studies also identified both protective and risk-increasing variants among BRCA2 PV carriers: UNG, TDG, and PARP2, and haplotypes in ATM, BRIP1, BARD1, MRE11, RAD51, and 9p22.2. The analysis identified 11 variants affecting both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, most of which increase risk, including the following: IRS1, RSPO1, SYNPO2, BABAM1, MRPL34, PLEKHM1, and TIPARP. Protective variants include BNC2 and LINC00824. The only SNP reaching genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10⁻⁸) was in BNC2. Conclusions: The article summarizes the growing number of genetic modifiers of ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers and highlights their potential to improve individualized risk assessment, enhance patient stratification, support personalized prevention and surveillance strategies, deepen the understanding of disease biology, and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Cervical cancer (CxCa) remains one of the most common malignancies in women worldwide. Although almost all cases are associated with chronic infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types, not every infected woman develops the disease, indicating a significant role of genetic factors. This study reviewed 131 studies on genes related to immune system function and their impact on the risk of developing cervical cancer. The majority of the studies analyzed were conducted in Asian populations, primarily Chinese and Indian. The analysis focused in particular on polymorphisms in genes involved in the antiviral response, inflammatory processes, antigen presentation, and regulation of lymphocyte activity. Most of the evidence points to the importance of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) genes, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), interleukins (ILs), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferons (IFNs). Variants in these genes may influence the effectiveness of HPV clearance, susceptibility to persistent infection, and the risk of progression of precancerous lesions to invasive cancer. It is worth emphasizing that identifying genetic risk factors may, in the future, support the development of personalized prevention strategies, screening tests, and the assessment of the individual risk of disease. Nevertheless, most available findings warrant further validation in large and diverse populations. In summary, cervical cancer is the result of a complex interaction between HPV infection and the host’s genetic predisposition. Research on immune response genes provides valuable information about the mechanisms of disease development, and may contribute to improved methods of prevention and early detection.