MiRBase is the primary repository for published miRNA sequence and annotation data, and serves as the “go-to” place for miRNA research. However, the definition and annotation of miRNAs have been changed significantly across different versions of miRBase. The changes cause inconsistency in miRNA related data between different databases and articles published at different times. Several tools have been developed for different purposes of querying and converting the information of miRNAs between different miRBase versions, but none of them individually can provide the comprehensive information about miRNAs in miRBase and users will need to use a number of different tools in their analyses. We introduce miRBaseConverter, an R package integrating the latest miRBase version 22 available in Bioconductor to provide a suite of functions for converting and retrieving miRNA name (ID), accession, sequence, species, version and family information in different versions of miRBase. The package is implemented in R and available under the GPL-2 license from the Bioconductor website ( http://bioconductor.org/packages/miRBaseConverter/ ). A Shiny-based GUI suitable for non-R users is also available as a standalone application from the package and also as a web application at http://nugget.unisa.edu.au:3838/miRBaseConverter . miRBaseConverter has a built-in database for querying miRNA information in all species and for both pre-mature and mature miRNAs defined by miRBase. In addition, it is the first tool for batch querying the miRNA family information. The package aims to provide a comprehensive and easy-to-use tool for miRNA research community where researchers often utilize published miRNA data from different sources. The Bioconductor package miRBaseConverter and the Shiny-based web application are presented to provide a suite of functions for converting and retrieving miRNA name, accession, sequence, species, version and family information in different versions of miRBase. The package will serve a wide range of applications in miRNA research and could provide a full view of the miRNAs of interest.

Motivation: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with the length of ∼22 nucleotides. miRNAs are involved in many biological processes including cancers. Recent studies show that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as miRNA sponges, playing important roles in cancer physiology and development. Despite accumulating appreciation of the importance of lncRNAs, the study of their complex functions is still in its preliminary stage. Based on the hypothesis of competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), several computational methods have been proposed for investigating the competitive relationships between lncRNAs and miRNA target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). However, when the mRNAs are released from the control of miRNAs, it remains largely unknown as to how the sponge lncRNAs influence the expression levels of the endogenous miRNA targets. Results: We propose a novel method to construct lncRNA related miRNA sponge regulatory networks (LncmiRSRNs) by integrating matched lncRNA and mRNA expression profiles with clinical information and putative miRNA-target interactions. Using the method, we have constructed the LncmiRSRNs for four human cancers (glioblastoma multiforme, lung cancer, ovarian cancer and prostate cancer). Based on the networks, we discover that after being released from miRNA control, the target mRNAs are normally up-regulated by the sponge lncRNAs, and only a fraction of sponge lncRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships and hub lncRNAs are shared by the four cancers. Moreover, most sponge lncRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships show a rewired mode between different cancers, and a minority of sponge lncRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships conserved (appearing) in different cancers may act as a common pivot across cancers. Besides, differential and conserved hub lncRNAs may act as potential cancer drivers to influence the cancerous state in cancers. Functional enrichment and survival analysis indicate that the identified differential and conserved LncmiRSRN network modules work as functional units in biological processes, and can distinguish metastasis risks of cancers. Our analysis demonstrates the potential of integrating expression profiles, clinical information and miRNA-target interactions for investigating lncRNA regulatory mechanism. Availability and implementation: LncmiRSRN is freely available (https://github.com/zhangjunpeng411/LncmiRSRN). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important gene regulators. They control a wide range of biological processes and are involved in several types of cancers. Thus, exploring miRNA functions is important for diagnostics and therapeutics. To date, there are few feasible experimental techniques for discovering miRNA regulatory mechanisms. Alternatively, predictions of miRNA–mRNA regulatory relationships by computational methods have increasingly achieved promising results. Computational approaches are proving their ability as effective tools in reducing the number of biological experiments that must be conducted and to assist with the design of the experiments. In this review, we categorize and review different computational approaches to identify miRNA activities and functions, including the co-regulation of miRNAs and transcription factors. Our main focuses are on the recent approaches that use multiple data types for exploring miRNA functions. We discuss the remaining challenges in the evaluation and selection of models based on the results from a case study. Finally, we analyse the remaining challenges of each computational approach and suggest some future research directions.

It is known that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) cover ∼98% of the transcriptome, but do not encode proteins. Among ncRNAs, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a large and diverse class of RNA molecules, and are thought to be a gold mine of potential oncogenes, anti-oncogenes and new biomarkers. Although only a minority of lncRNAs is functionally characterized, it is clear that they are important regulators to modulate gene expression and involve in many biological functions. To reveal the functions and regulatory mechanisms of lncRNAs, it is vital to understand how lncRNAs regulate their target genes for implementing specific biological functions. In this article, we review the computational methods for inferring lncRNA–mRNA interactions and the third-party databases of storing lncRNA–mRNA regulatory relationships. We have found that the existing methods are based on statistical correlations between the gene expression levels of lncRNAs and mRNAs, and may not reveal gene regulatory relationships which are causal relationships. Moreover, these methods do not consider the modularity of lncRNA–mRNA regulatory networks, and thus, the networks identified are not module-specific. To address the above two issues, we propose a novel method, MSLCRN, to infer and analyze module-specific lncRNA–mRNA causal regulatory networks. We have applied it into glioblastoma multiforme, lung squamous cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer and prostate cancer, respectively. The experimental results show that MSLCRN, as an expression-based method, could be a useful complementary method to study lncRNA regulations.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short regulatory RNAs that are involved in several diseases, including cancers. Identifying miRNA functions is very important in understanding disease mechanisms and determining the efficacy of drugs. An increasing number of computational methods have been developed to explore miRNA functions by inferring the miRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships from data. Each of the methods is developed based on some assumptions and constraints, for instance, assuming linear relationships between variables. For such reasons, computational methods are often subject to the problem of inconsistent performance across different datasets. On the other hand, ensemble methods integrate the results from individual methods and have been proved to outperform each of their individual component methods in theory. In this paper, we investigate the performance of some ensemble methods over the commonly used miRNA target prediction methods. We apply eight different popular miRNA target prediction methods to three cancer datasets, and compare their performance with the ensemble methods which integrate the results from each combination of the individual methods. The validation results using experimentally confirmed databases show that the results of the ensemble methods complement those obtained by the individual methods and the ensemble methods perform better than the individual methods across different datasets. The ensemble method, Pearson+IDA+Lasso, which combines methods in different approaches, including a correlation method, a causal inference method, and a regression method, is the best performed ensemble method in this study. Further analysis of the results of this ensemble method shows that the ensemble method can obtain more targets which could not be found by any of the single methods, and the discovered targets are more statistically significant and functionally enriched. The source codes, datasets, miRNA target predictions by all methods, and the ground truth for validation are available in the Supplementary materials.