This study examines the community integration and One Health strategies employed to combat Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2007 to 2022. We synthesized 12 outbreak reports, conducted qualitative interviews with 36 managers, organized three focus groups, and adapted an analytical framework (MATCH) to evaluate three essential dimensions: the integration of the One Health approach, community involvement, and bottom-up approaches. This study evidences progressive improvement in all domains. The first outbreaks (2007–2009) were marked by moderate community engagement and a One Health approach that was largely limited to the human health sector, deemed suboptimal. The 10th outbreak represented an era of transformation, when the Incident Management System (IMS) was adopted to better manage the response to the virus. The latest outbreaks (13th to 15th) demonstrate an “optimal” implementation of the “One Health” approach through effective collaboration between those in charge of ensuring human, animal, and environmental health and that of the community. This study demonstrates that success is largely dependent on bottom-up initiatives in which local populations, their leaders (both traditional and religious), community liaisons, and specific groups (women and youth) are involved in the design and implementation of such measures. The inclusion of anthropologists and psychologists in addressing the psychosocial dimensions—fear, stigma, and distress—has been critical in ensuring the success of these initiatives and the degree to which the public trusts and accepts them. However, many issues still need to be addressed, including poor coordination among sectoral ministries and the partial implementation of IMS at the grassroots level. In summary, the authors of this study propose that these integrated and participatory models are sustainable and imperative to building the resilience of the Congolese health system to future outbreaks.
The 2025 Ebola outbreak that ravaged the Bulape Health District (HD) in Kasai, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), was tackled using the incident management system (IMS) model. The Bulape HD is located in the Mweka territory, which has experienced two Ebola epidemics: one in 2007 and another in 2008. The IMS comprises seven strategies recommended for an effective response to an Ebola outbreak: (i) thorough investigation, (ii) strengthening infection prevention and control measures in the community, (iii) ensuring that medical care is provided by experienced professionals, (iv) strengthening risk communication and community engagement (RCCE), (v) ring vaccination, (vi) operational research, and (vii) anchoring interventions in the existing health system. We share our experience implementing these seven strategies and compare them with those utilized during three previous Ebola outbreaks. This paper describes our achievements, the resulting benefits, and the factors that facilitated the implementation of the aforementioned strategies. A literature review and interviews were conducted. The atlas.ti 22 software was used for data analysis. Implementing these seven strategies contributed to an effective response, largely due to the experience and expertise of those involved but also thanks to the support of technical and financial partners (TFPs) and the engagement of the local community. Challenges such as geographical accessibility, the fragile health system, the community’s strong attachment to traditional practices, and negative reactions to healthcare—which was widely discredited, with many of those involved expressing a lack of faith in its effectiveness—were major obstacles. To overcome these challenges, an integrated approach was utilized, combining a rapid comprehensive response with deep and respectful community engagement. The support and alignment of TFPs were invaluable during this process. The RCCE pillar proved key to successful IMS implementation. Our experiences will be useful during the next Ebola outbreak in the DRC; additionally, they may also help to inform the response to similar outbreaks in other countries.
This study examines the community integration and One Health strategies employed to fight Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo in the years 2007–2022. We synthesized twelve outbreak reports and conducted qualitative interviews of thirty-six managers and three focus groups and adapted an analytical framework (MATCH) to evaluate three essential dimensions: integration of the One Health approach, community involvement, and bottom-up approaches. This study found evidence of progressive improvement in all domains. The first outbreaks (2007–2009) were marked by moderate community engagement and a One Health approach that was mostly limited to the human health sector, which was deemed suboptimal. The 10th outbreak represented an era of transformation, when the Incident Management System (IMS) was adopted to better manage the response to the virus. The latest outbreaks (13th to 15th) show “optimal” implementation of the “One Health” approach through effective collaboration among those in charge of ensuring human, animal, and environmental health and the community. This study demonstrates that success is largely dependent on bottom-up initiatives where local populations, their leaders (both traditional and religious leaders), community liaisons, and specific groups (women and youth) are involved in the design and implementation of such measures. The inclusion of anthropologists and psychologists in addressing the psychosocial dimensions—fear, stigma, and distress—has been critical in ensuring the success of these initiatives and the degree to which the public trust and accept them. However, there are many issues that still need to be addressed, including poor coordination between sectoral ministries and the partial implementation of IMS at the grassroots level. In summary, the authors of this study propose that these integrated and participatory models are sustainable and imperative to building the resilience of the Congolese health system to future outbreaks.