Jaswinder Singh

Dr. Jaswinder Singh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJaswinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh
AKAfia Saabea Owusu Konadu
Afia Saabea Owusu Konadu
YLYu Li
Yu Li
BSBoris Shabaltiy
Boris Shabaltiy
YLYu-Long Li
Yu-Long Li
Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is related to cardiac arrhythmias. The stellate ganglion (SG), part of the sympathetic nervous system, regulates heart function. Within the SG, satellite glial cells (SGCs) have gap junction channels (Cx43). Increased Cx43 permeability induces SGC depolarization and activates the PKC-MAPK14-ADAM17 signaling pathway, releasing some endogenous factors that stimulate nearby cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons (CPSN). This study investigated the activation of the PKC-MAPK14-ADAM17 signaling pathway in T2DM SGs and SGCs as a novel mechanism of sympathetic overactivation. A total of 56 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to sham and T2DM groups, and T2DM was induced using a high-fat diet combined with low-dose streptozotocin. Real-time RT-PCR, Western blot, and ELISA quantified mRNA/protein expression and enzymatic activity. The patch clamp technique assessed neuronal voltage-gated Ca2+ currents and action potentials, while electrophysiological recording measured cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA). T2DM rats exhibited marked upregulation of MAPK14, PKC-α, and ADAM17 mRNA/protein in the SG, alongside elevated enzymatic activities of PKC and ADAM17. T2DM also increased Ca2+ currents and neuronal excitability in the CPSN and induced the elevation of the CSNA. Upregulated PKC-MAPK-ADAM17 signaling in the SG might contribute to cardiac sympathetic overactivation in T2DM rats by enhancing the cell excitability of the CPSN.

10 August 2021 in International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJaswinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh
VKVikas Kumar
Vikas Kumar
AAAshish Aneja
Ashish Aneja
JSJasbir Singh
Jasbir Singh

1 June 2009 in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VHVijay Hegde
Vijay Hegde
IMIzabela Mitrut
Izabela Mitrut
HBH. Bennett
H. Bennett
JSJaswinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh

10 June 2019 in International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKVikas Kumar
Vikas Kumar
JSJaswinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh
AAAshish Aneja
Ashish Aneja
JSJasbir Singh
Jasbir Singh

29 October 2026 in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPranvi Sharma
Pranvi Sharma
TNTanaka Nhokwara
Tanaka Nhokwara
JSJaswinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh
KBKiran Bala
Kiran Bala
KKKajal Kamra
Kajal Kamra
Background: The gut–skin axis links intestinal microbial activity with inflammatory skin disease, yet findings across atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, and psoriasis remain inconsistent. This review examines how disease biology and host context shape microbiome‐related effects and responses to probiotics. Materials and Methods: Published clinical and experimental evidence on gut microbiota, immune and metabolic signaling, barrier dysfunction, inter‐organ communication, and probiotic interventions was narratively reviewed across atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, and psoriasis. Results: Microbiome‐related mechanisms differ by disease. In atopic dermatitis, they intersect with barrier dysfunction and altered immune regulation. In acne vulgaris, metabolic, hormonal, dietary, and neuroendocrine factors modify their effects. In psoriasis, gut dysbiosis occurs within a broader setting of systemic immune activation. Probiotic outcomes are similarly variable and depend on strain, host characteristics, disease context, and study design. Discussion: Gut–skin communication is better interpreted as part of an interconnected physiological network rather than a uniform linear pathway. Disease‐specific evaluation of microbiome changes and probiotic interventions may help explain conflicting findings and guide more targeted future studies.