Head and neck photoimmunotherapy (HN-PIT), a new treatment developed for local control of head and neck carcinoma, uses cetuximab sarotalocan sodium with a laser system to specifically destroy only tumor cells. No studies have examined the impact of HN-PIT on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with head and neck cancer. This study assessed the QOL of patients with unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck carcinoma (LA/LR-HNC) treated with HN-PIT. Nine eligible patients with unresectable LA/LR-HNC who underwent HN-PIT at our institution between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2022 were included in the study. They completed a QOL evaluation form. The primary endpoint was QOL assessment. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and adverse events. QOL was compared before and 4 weeks after HN-PIT. There were no significant changes in all QOL assessment parameters after treatment with HN-PIT. The overall response rate was 89%, and safety was acceptable. For patients with unresectable LA/LR-HNC, HN-PIT provided good local control without decreasing the QOL. The addition of HN-PIT to conventional head and neck carcinoma treatment may lead to the prolongation of OS in head and neck carcinoma.

No real-world, long-term outcomes of immunotherapy with nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) have yet been reported. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of the best overall response (BOR) of this therapy remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional cohort study of the long-term efficacy and safety of this therapy and investigated prognostic factors associated with survival. Further, we evaluated the relationship between BOR and survival. Median follow-up time was 25.9 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months, and two-year survival rate was 25.0%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months, and two-year PFS rate was 19.6%. BOR was assessed as complete response (CR) in 6%, partial response (PR) in 13%, stable disease (SD) in 30%, and progressive disease (PD) in 52% of the patients. Overall response rate was 18%, and disease control rate was 48%. For immune-related adverse events (irAEs), 38 irAEs were detected in 29 patients. On multivariate analysis, the development of irAEs was significantly associated with better OS and PFS. Better BOR was significantly associated with longer OS and PFS. These findings demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab therapy for R/M SCCHN in a real-world setting. The magnitude of BOR and the development of irAEs might be useful surrogate markers of survival.

This study compared the incidence of perioperative complications and swallowing function between free jejunal flap reconstruction and cutaneous free tissue flap construction. We included 223 patients who underwent hypopharyngeal reconstruction using free flap. At discharge, +the free jejunal flap was associated with a Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score of 1–6 in 132 cases (70%) and a score of 7 in 56 cases (30%). Regarding the cutaneous free tissue flaps, FOIS scores of 1–6 were observed in 18 cases (51%), and a score of 7 was noted in 17 cases (49%). Donor site complications occurred in 12% of the patients who underwent free jejunal flap procedures and in none of the patients who underwent cutaneous free tissue flap procedures. We found that the free jejunal flap had a regular dietary intake rate in 56 patients (30%), whereas cutaneous free tissue flaps had a regular dietary intake rate in 17 patients (49%). Cutaneous free tissue flaps had a significantly higher regular dietary intake rate at discharge and a significantly lower incidence of donor site complications than free jejunal flaps. In conclusion, free-flap reconstruction may be a better method than free jejunal flap reconstruction for the treatment of hypopharyngeal cancer.

Background/Aim: Pembrolizumab exhibits anticancer efficacy in platinum-sensitive or platinum-unfit patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, no large-scale retrospective real-world data are available. This retrospective study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in multiple facilities. Patients and Methods: Data of 167 patients with R/M SCCHN treated with pembrolizumab between December 2019 and February 2022 were analyzed. The endpoint was overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). OS and PFS were analyzed comparatively with and without irAEs, and complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) were compared. Results: One hundred thirty-five patients received pembrolizumab alone, whereas the others received pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. For the pembrolizumab only group, the median OS and PFS were 22.7 and 5.1 months, respectively. There were significant differences in OS and PFS between CR or PR and SD or PD (p<0.01, p<0.01, respectively). For pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, the OS was not reached and median PFS was 7.0 months. There was a significant difference in PFS between CR or PR and SD or PD (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in PFS between patients with and without irAEs (p=0.02). Conclusion: The real-world therapeutic effect of pembrolizumab for R/M SCCHN was comparable to that observed in the KEYNOTE048 trial. In addition, irAEs and best overall response were considered as prognostic factors.

Background/Aim: Nivolumab has antitumor efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) who relapse within 6 months after platinum-based therapy; however, the efficacy of nivolumab for platinum-sensitive R/M HNSCC has not been shown. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive R/M HNSCC. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who received nivolumab for R/M HNSCC who had been previously treated with platinum-based anticancer drugs. Patients were divided into a platinum-sensitive and a platinum-refractory group, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the overall response rate (ORR) [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)], the disease control rate (DCR) (CR + PR + stable disease), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between the two groups. Results: We included 88 patients with squamous cell carcinoma: 60 with platinum-refractory disease and 28 with platinum-sensitive disease. The median PFS in the platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive groups were 2.7 months and 5.3 months, respectively (p=0.03), and the median OS were 8.8 months and 17.1 months, respectively (p=0.06). There were no significant differences in the ORR, DCR, or incidence of irAEs between the two groups (p>0.99, p=0.11, and p>0.99, respectively). Conclusion: Nivolumab is a safe and effective treatment for platinum-sensitive R/M HNSCC.

Background/Aim: Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (L/A SCCHN) is typically treated with surgery or chemoradiation therapy (CRT), whereas salvage surgery is considered for residual disease post-CRT. However, salvage surgery after radiation therapy presents challenges due to tissue fibrosis. Planned neck dissection (ND) combined with CRT, as well as positron emission tomography after CRT, have been proposed strategies, but no definitive consensus has been reached. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the utility of “upfront ND” performed prior to CRT to enhance local control and reduce complications. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients who underwent primary CRT for oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer at Tokyo Medical University Hospital from January 2015 to September 2021. Patients without cervical lymph node metastasis or with unresectable nodes were excluded. All patients underwent pre-treatment imaging and staging. CRT consisted of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Selective ND or modified radical neck dissection was performed based on lymph node involvement. Results: Overall, 35 patients underwent upfront ND, whereas 54 did not. The upfront ND group exhibited significantly better 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival than the group without upfront ND (93.7% vs. 71.0%). No significant differences were noted in adverse events between groups. Conclusion: The findings highlight upfront ND before CRT as a viable option for locally advanced head and neck cancer, particularly beneficial in cases with extranodal extension. This approach enhances local control and may reduce the need for salvage surgery, thus improving patient outcomes.