Background: Discrepancies are frequently observed between liver steatosis grading assessed by conventional B-mode ultrasonography and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). This study aimed to identify factors associated with these differences and to evaluate whether the two imaging methods provide comparable steatosis classifications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 130 hospitalized patients evaluated over a two-year period who underwent laboratory testing, abdominal ultrasonography, and transient elastography. The analyzed variables included demographic characteristics, nutritional status, comorbidities, and biochemical parameters such as alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), total cholesterol, triglycerides, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). Patients were classified into two groups: concordant steatosis grading between the two methods (n = 61) and discordant results (n = 69). Results: Concordant steatosis grading was more frequently observed in patients with serum total cholesterol > 200 mg/dL (45.9%) and FIB-4 values between 1.45–3.25 (44.2%). A trend toward higher concordance was also observed in patients with elevated triglycerides. In contrast, viral liver disease was significantly associated with discordant results (26.2%). Higher fibrosis stages assessed by VCTE (F ≥ 2) and FIB-4 values > 3.25 showed a non-significant trend toward discordance. Conclusions: Several clinical and biochemical factors influence the agreement between ultrasound and VCTE-based CAP in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Elevated cholesterol and intermediate FIB-4 values were associated with concordant results, whereas viral liver disease was associated with discordance between the two imaging modalities.

Background: Discrepancies are frequently observed between liver steatosis grading assessed by conventional B-mode ultrasonography and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). This study aimed to identify factors associated with these differences and to evaluate whether the two imaging methods provide comparable steatosis classifications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional observational study including 130 hospitalized patients evaluated over a two-year period who underwent laboratory testing, abdominal ultrasonography, and transient elastography. The analyzed variables included demographic characteristics, nutritional status, comorbidities, and biochemical parameters such as alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), total cholesterol, triglycerides, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). Patients were classified into two groups: concordant steatosis grading between the two methods (n = 61) and discordant results (n = 69). Results: Concordant steatosis grading was more frequently observed in patients with serum total cholesterol >200 mg/dL (45.9%) and FIB-4 values between 1.45–3.25 (44.2%). A trend toward higher concordance was also observed in patients with elevated triglycerides. In contrast, viral liver disease was significantly associated with discordant results (26.2%). Higher fibrosis stages assessed by VCTE (F ≥ 2) and FIB-4 values >3.25 showed a non-significant trend toward discordance. Conclusions: Several clinical and biochemical factors influence the agreement between ultrasound and VCTE-based CAP in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Elevated cholesterol and intermediate FIB-4 values were associated with concordant results, whereas viral liver disease was associated with discordance between the two imaging modalities.

Hepatocellular injury syndrome represents a pathological process with a broad etiological spectrum, including viral infections, autoimmune diseases, or intoxications. Clinicians must identify the potential cause using both anamnestic data and available paraclinical examinations. We present the case of a 55-year-old female patient, admitted to the Internal Medicine 1 Department at the Clinical County Emergency Hospital Bihor, Oradea, Romania. The patient exhibited nonspecific complaints and insignificant pathological antecedents, but from a biochemical perspective, substantial changes in liver transaminase levels were evident. To establish differential diagnoses, a series of biochemical and immunological tests were performed, along with a thorough medical history. It was concluded that the patient regularly consumes herbal infusions, specifically Laurus nobilis leaves, commonly known as Bay Laurel. Although this might be easily overlooked at first glance, a closer examination could explain the current clinical picture. In April 2024, a 55-year-old female patient with no history of liver pathology was admitted. She complained of asthenia fatigue, anorexia, mixed dyspeptic symptoms, diffuse abdominal pain, and a weight loss of 12 kg. The pathology had insidiously started approximately 3 months prior. On examination, the patient had altered general status, anorexia, and was overweight. Biochemically, the patient had elevated liver transaminase values (AST = 196 U/L and ALT = 357 U/L) that continued to rise during hospitalization, despite hepatoprotective treatment. Various paraclinical examinations were performed to exclude other potential causes of hepatic aggression, having excluded ordinary causes. Consequently, a liver biopsy was performed, and the histopathological examination leaned toward a toxic hepatitis etiology. Application of the updated RUCAM scale yielded a score of eight points (“probable” HILI—Herb-Induced Liver Injury). Clinical and biochemical improvement was observed after complete cessation of bay leaf tea consumption. This case highlights the potential hepatotoxicity of commonly used culinary herbs when consumed in large quantities or as concentrated infusions and emphasizes the importance of detailed anamnesis regarding herbal product use.

Hepatocellular syndrome represents a pathological process with a broad etiological spectrum, including viral infections, autoimmune diseases, or intoxications. Clinicians must identify the potential cause using both anamnestic data and available paraclinical examinations. We present the case of a 55-year-old female patient, admitted to the Internal Medicine 1 Department at the Clinical County Emergency Hospital Bihor, Oradea, Romania. The patient exhibited nonspecific complaints and insignificant pathological antecedents, but from a biochemical perspective, substantial changes in liver transaminase levels were evident. To establish differential diagnoses, a series of biochemical and immunological tests were performed, along with a thorough medical history. It was concluded that the patient regularly consumes herbal infusions, specifically Laurus Nobilis leaves, commonly known as Bay Laurel. Although this might be easily overlooked at first glance, a closer examination could explain the current clinical picture. In April 2024, a 55-year-old female patient with no history of liver pathology was admitted. She complained of asthenofatigue, anorexia, mixed dyspeptic symptoms, diffuse abdominal pain, and a weight loss of 12 kg. The pathology had insidiously started approximately 3 months prior. On examination, the patient had altered general status, anorexia, and was overweight. Biochemically, elevated liver transaminase values (AST = 196 U/L / ALT = 357 U/L) that continued to rise during hospitalization, despite hepatoprotective treatment. Various paraclinical examinations were performed to exclude other potential causes of hepatic aggression, being excluded ordinary causes. Consequently, a liver biopsy was performed, and the histopathological examination leaned toward a toxic hepatitis etiology. Application of the RUCAM scale yielded a score of 8 points (“probable” HILI). Clinical and biochemical improvement was observed after complete cessation of bay leaf tea consumption. This case highlights the potential hepatotoxicity of commonly used culinary herbs when consumed in large quantities or as concentrated infusions and emphasizes the importance of detailed anamnesis regarding herbal product use.

During routine evaluation of hospitalized patients, discrepancies were frequently observed between the degree of liver steatosis assessed by conventional B-mode ultrasonography and Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP). This study aimed to identify the factors contributing to these differences and to determine whether both imaging methods should be expected to produce comparable steatosis classifications. We conducted an observational retrospective cross-sectional study including 130 patients admitted over a two-year period who underwent laboratory testing, abdominal ultrasonography, and transient elastography. Variables analyzed included age, sex, environment, nutritional status, comorbidities, biochemical parameters (ALAT, total cholesterol, triglycerides, GGT), calculated FIB-4 score. Patients were classified in two groups: 61 with concordant steatosis grades across both methods and 69 with discordant results. Concordant results were more common in individuals with serum total cholesterol >200 mg/dL (45.9%), and those with a Fib-4 score between 1.45–3.25 (44.2%). Additionally, a trend toward a stronger correlation was observed in patients with elevated triglycerides. Viral liver disease showed a significantly higher rate of discordant results (26.2%). Total serum cholesterol >200 mg/dL, and a FIB-4 score between 1.45–3.25 can be significantly associated with concordance in steatosis grading, while serum triglyceride levels showed a nonsignificant trend toward concordance. In contrast, viral hepatitis with concomitant steatosis can be associated with discordant findings between the two imaging modalities. Although not statistically significant, a value F ≥ 2 measured by VCTE measured fibrosis and a FIB-4 score >3.25 also showed a trend toward discordance, suggesting they may contribute to variability in steatosis assessment.