The main objective of 235 U irradiation is to obtain the 99m Tc isotope, which is widely used in the domain of medical diagnostics. The decisive factor determining its availability, despite its short lifetime, is a reaction of radioactive decay of 99 Mo into 99m Tc. One of the possible sources of molybdenum can be achieved in course of the 235 U fission reaction. The paper presents activities and the calculation results obtained upon the feasibility study on irradiation of 235 U targets for production of 99 Mo in the MARIA research reactor. Neutronic calculations and analyses were performed to estimate the fission products activity for uranium plates irradiated in the reactor. Results of dummy targets irradiation as well as irradiation uranium plates have been presented. The new technology obtaining 99 Mo is based on irradiation of high-enriched uranium plates in standard reactor fuel channel and calculation of the current fission power generation. Measurements of temperatures and the coolant flow in the molybdenum installation carried out in reactor SAREMA system give online information about the current fission power generated in uranium targets. The corrective factors were taken into account as the heat generation from gamma radiation from neighbouring fuel elements as well as heat exchange between channels and the reactor pool. The factors were determined by calibration measurements conducted with aluminium mock-up of uranium plates. Calculations of fuel channel by means of REBUS code with fine mesh structure and libraries calculated by means of WIMS-ANL code were performed.
BNCT (Boron Neutron Capture Therapy) is a binary radiotherapeutic modality in which high LET (Linear Energy Transfer) particles are generated from 10B(n,α)7Li reaction, ideally within boron-loaded tumour cells, so the therapeutic outcome depends critically on the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of boron carriers. In this review, boron-containing agents for BNCT, with a focus on ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) and model-informed design, were examined. Low-MW (low-molecular-weight) compounds, peptide conjugates, polymeric and nanostructured platforms and cell-based vectors were surveyed and how physicochemical properties, transporter engagement and nano–bio interactions govern tumour uptake, subcellular localisation and normal tissue exposure were discussed. A shift from maximising boron content towards optimising exposure profiles using PET (Positron Emission Tomography), PBK (physiologically based pharmacokinetic) modelling and in silico ADMET tools to define irradiation windows was also discussed. Classical agents such as BPA (Boronophenylalanine) and BSH (Sodium Borocaptate) are contrasted with newer polymeric and metallacarborane-based carriers, with attention to brain penetration, endosomal escape, linker stability, biodegradation and elimination routes, as well as platform-specific toxicities. Incontestably, further progress in BNCT will highly depend on integrating imaging-derived kinetics with PBPK-informed dose planning and engineering subcellularly precise yet degradable carriers, and that ADMET-guided design and spatiotemporal coordination are central to achieving reproducible clinical benefit from BNCT’s spatial selectivity.