Mary Donofrio

Dr. Mary Donofrio

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2013 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMary Donofrio
Mary Donofrio
RLRichard J. Levy
Richard J. Levy
JSJennifer J. Schuette
Jennifer J. Schuette
KSKami Skurow-Todd
Kami Skurow-Todd
MSMay-Britt Sten
May-Britt Sten
JBJohn T. Berger
John T. Berger

17 May 2021 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAnita Krishnan
Anita Krishnan
MJMarni B. Jacobs
Marni B. Jacobs
SMShaine Alaine Morris
Shaine Alaine Morris
SPShabnam Peyvandi
Shabnam Peyvandi
ABAarti H. Bhat
Aarti H. Bhat
AWAlysia Wiener
Alysia Wiener
Background: Prenatal detection (PND) has benefits for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and transposition of the great arteries (TGA), but associations between sociodemographic and geographic factors with PND have not been sufficiently explored. This study evaluated whether socioeconomic quartile (SEQ), public insurance, race and ethnicity, rural residence, and distance of residence (distance and driving time from a cardiac surgical center) are associated with the PND or timing of PND, with a secondary aim to analyze differences between the United States and Canada. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, fetuses and infants <2 months of age with HLHS or TGA admitted between 2012 and 2016 to participating Fetal Heart Society Research Collaborative institutions in the United States and Canada were included. SEQ, rural residence, and distance of residence were derived using maternal census tract from the maternal address at first visit. Subjects were assigned a SEQ z score using the neighborhood summary score or Canadian Chan index and separated into quartiles. Insurance type and self-reported race and ethnicity were obtained from medical charts. We evaluated associations among SEQ, insurance type, race and ethnicity, rural residence, and distance of residence with PND of HLHS and TGA (aggregate and individually) using bivariate analysis with adjusted associations for confounding variables and cluster analysis for centers. Results: Data on 1862 subjects (HLHS: n=1171, 92% PND; TGA: n=691, 58% PND) were submitted by 21 centers (19 in the United States). In the United States, lower SEQ was associated with lower PND in HLHS and TGA, with the strongest association in the lower SEQ of pregnancies with fetal TGA (quartile 1, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.64–0.85], quartile 2, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64–0.93], quartile 3, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69–1.00], quartile 4, reference). Hispanic ethnicity (relative risk, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72–0.99]) and rural residence (relative risk, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.64–0.95]) were also associated with lower PND in TGA. Lower SEQ was associated with later PND overall; in the United States, rural residence and public insurance were also associated with later PND. Conclusions: We demonstrate that lower SEQ, Hispanic ethnicity, and rural residence are associated with decreased PND for TGA, with lower SEQ also being associated with decreased PND for HLHS. Future work to increase PND should be considered in these specific populations.

24 August 2010 in International Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMary Donofrio
Mary Donofrio
AMAn N. Massaro
An N. Massaro
Advances in cardiac surgical techniques and perioperative intensive care have led to improved survival in babies with congenital heart disease (CHD). While it is true that the majority of children with CHD today will survive, many will have impaired neurodevelopmental outcome across a wide spectrum of domains. While continuing to improve short-term morbidity and mortality is an important goal, recent and ongoing research has focused on defining the impact of CHD on brain development, minimizing postnatal brain injury, and improving long-term outcomes. This paper will review the impact that CHD has on the developing brain of the fetus and infant. Neurologic abnormalities detectable prior to surgery will be described. Potential etiologies of these findings will be discussed, including altered fetal intrauterine growth, cerebral blood flow and brain development, associated congenital brain abnormalities, and risk for postnatal brain injury. Finally, reported neurodevelopmental outcomes after surgical repair of CHD will be reviewed.

1 October 2011 in Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMary Donofrio
Mary Donofrio
ADAdré J. Duplessis
Adré J. Duplessis
CLCatherine Limperopoulos
Catherine Limperopoulos
Advances in cardiac surgical techniques and intensive care have led to improved survival in babies with congenital heart disease (CHD). Although it is true that the majority of children with CHD today survive, many have impaired neurodevelopmental outcome. Although continuing to improve short-term morbidity and mortality are important goals, recent research has focused on defining the impact of CHD on brain development and brain injury in utero. The impact of CHD on the developing brain of the fetus and infant will be discussed. Neurologic abnormalities detectable prior to surgery will be described and postnatal progression of abnormalities will be highlighted. Potential causes of these findings will be discussed, including altered cerebral blood flow in utero, and brain development and risk for in-utero and postnatal brain injury. Finally, neurologic and developmental outcome after surgical repair of CHD will be reviewed. Neurodevelopmental evaluation preoperatively and postoperatively in CHD patients should be standard practice, not only to identify those with impairments who would benefit from intervention services but also to identify risk factors and strategies to optimize outcome. Fetal management and intervention strategies for specific defects may ultimately play a role in improving in-utero hemodynamics and increasing cerebral oxygen delivery to enhance brain development.

1 November 2015 in Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMary Donofrio
Mary Donofrio
KSKami Skurow-Todd
Kami Skurow-Todd
JBJohn T. Berger
John T. Berger
RMRobert McCarter
Robert McCarter
AFAmanda Fulgium
Amanda Fulgium
CSCraig A. Sable
Craig A. Sable

17 March 2016 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBM. Brossard-Racine
M. Brossard-Racine
APA. du Plessis
A. du Plessis
GVG. Vezina
G. Vezina
RRR. Robertson
R. Robertson
MDMary Donofrio
Mary Donofrio
CLCatherine Limperopoulos
Catherine Limperopoulos
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain injury in neonates with congenital heart disease is an important predictor of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Impaired brain development in congenital heart disease may have a prenatal origin, but the sensitivity and specificity of fetal brain MR imaging for predicting neonatal brain lesions are currently unknown. We sought to determine the value of conventional fetal MR imaging for predicting abnormal findings on neonatal preoperative MR imaging in neonates with complex congenital heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging studies were performed in 103 fetuses with confirmed congenital heart disease (mean gestational age, 31.57 ± 3.86 weeks) and were repeated postnatally before cardiac surgery (mean age, 6.8 ± 12.2 days). Each MR imaging study was read by a pediatric neuroradiologist. RESULTS: Brain abnormalities were detected in 17/103 (16%) fetuses by fetal MR imaging and in 33/103 (32%) neonates by neonatal MR imaging. Only 9/33 studies with abnormal neonatal findings were preceded by abnormal findings on fetal MR imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional fetal brain MR imaging for predicting neonatal brain abnormalities were 27% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Brain abnormalities detected by in utero MR imaging in fetuses with congenital heart disease are associated with higher risk of postnatal preoperative brain injury. However, a substantial proportion of anomalies on postnatal MR imaging were not present on fetal MR imaging; this result is likely due to the limitations of conventional fetal MR imaging and the emergence of new lesions that occurred after the fetal studies. Postnatal brain MR imaging studies are needed to confirm the presence of injury before open heart surgery.