Peter Hau

Dr. Peter Hau

Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2009 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoger Stupp
Roger Stupp
MHMonika Hegi
Monika Hegi
WMWarren P Mason
Warren P Mason
MBMartin J. Van Den Bent
Martin J. Van Den Bent
MTMartin Jb Taphoorn
Martin Jb Taphoorn
RMRené-Olivier Mirimanoff
René-Olivier Mirimanoff

1 October 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NBNicholas Butowski
Nicholas Butowski
DTDavid D Tran
David D Tran
LRLawrence D Recht
Lawrence D Recht
MLMichael Lim
Michael Lim
HHHal Hirte
Hal Hirte
SNShona Nag
Shona Nag
Rindopepimut (also known as CDX-110), a vaccine targeting the EGFR deletion mutation EGFRvIII, consists of an EGFRvIII-specific peptide conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin. In the ACT IV study, we aimed to assess whether or not the addition of rindopepimut to standard chemotherapy is able to improve survival in patients with EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma. In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with glioblastoma from 165 hospitals in 22 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed glioblastoma confirmed to express EGFRvIII by central analysis, and had undergone maximal surgical resection and completion of standard chemoradiation without progression. Patients were stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recursive partitioning analysis class, MGMT promoter methylation, and geographical region, and randomly assigned (1:1) with a prespecified randomisation sequence (block size of four) to receive rindopepimut (500 μg admixed with 150 μg GM-CSF) or control (100 μg keyhole limpet haemocyanin) via monthly intradermal injection until progression or intolerance, concurrent with standard oral temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 for 5 of 28 days) for 6-12 cycles or longer. Patients, investigators, and the trial funder were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; enhancing tumour <2 cm2 post-chemoradiation by central review), analysed by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01480479. Between April 12, 2012, and Dec 15, 2014, 745 patients were enrolled (405 with MRD, 338 with significant residual disease [SRD], and two unevaluable) and randomly assigned to rindopepimut and temozolomide (n=371) or control and temozolomide (n=374). The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. At final analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival for patients with MRD: median overall survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 18·5-22·1) in the rindopepimut group versus 20·0 months (18·1-21·9) in the control group (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·79-1·30; p=0·93). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events for all 369 treated patients in the rindopepimut group versus 372 treated patients in the control group were: thrombocytopenia (32 [9%] vs 23 [6%]), fatigue (six [2%] vs 19 [5%]), brain oedema (eight [2%] vs 11 [3%]), seizure (nine [2%] vs eight [2%]), and headache (six [2%] vs ten [3%]). Serious adverse events included seizure (18 [5%] vs 22 [6%]) and brain oedema (seven [2%] vs 12 [3%]). 16 deaths in the study were caused by adverse events (nine [4%] in the rindopepimut group and seven [3%] in the control group), of which one-a pulmonary embolism in a 64-year-old male patient after 11 months of treatment-was assessed as potentially related to rindopepimut. Rindopepimut did not increase survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Combination approaches potentially including rindopepimut might be required to show efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

1 September 2014 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoger Stupp
Roger Stupp
MHMonika Hegi
Monika Hegi
TGThierry Gorlia
Thierry Gorlia
SESara C Erridge
Sara C Erridge
JPJames Perry
James Perry
MWMichael Weller
Michael Weller

1 February 2019 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UHUlrich Herrlinger
Ulrich Herrlinger
TTTheophilos Dimitrios Tzaridis
Theophilos Dimitrios Tzaridis
FMFrederic Mack
Frederic Mack
JSJoachim Peter Steinbach
Joachim Peter Steinbach
USUwe Schlegel
Uwe Schlegel
MGMartin Glas
Martin Glas

27 October 2010 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UBU. Bogdahn
U. Bogdahn
Peter HauPeter Hau
Peter Hau
GSG. Stockhammer
G. Stockhammer
NVN. K. Venkataramana
N. K. Venkataramana
AMA. K. Mahapatra
A. K. Mahapatra
TGthe Trabedersen Glioma Study Group
the Trabedersen Glioma Study Group
This randomized, open-label, active-controlled, dose-finding phase IIb study evaluated the efficacy and safety of trabedersen (AP 12009) administered intratumorally by convection-enhanced delivery compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with recurrent/refractory high-grade glioma. One hundred and forty-five patients with central reference histopathology of recurrent/refractory glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) were randomly assigned to receive trabedersen at doses of 10 or 80 µM or standard chemotherapy (temozolomide or procarbazine/lomustine/vincristine). Primary endpoint was 6-month tumor control rate, and secondary endpoints included response at further timepoints, survival, and safety. Six-month tumor control rates were not significantly different in the entire study population (AA and GBM). Prespecified AA subgroup analysis showed a significant benefit regarding the 14-month tumor control rate for 10 µM trabedersen vs chemotherapy (p= .0032). The 2-year survival rate had a trend for superiority for 10 µM trabedersen vs chemotherapy (p = .10). Median survival for 10 µM trabedersen was 39.1 months compared with 35.2 months for 80 µM trabedersen and 21.7 months for chemotherapy (not significant). In GBM patients, response and survival results were comparable among the 3 arms. Exploratory analysis on GBM patients aged ≤55 years with Karnofsky performance status >80% at baseline indicated a 3-fold survival at 2 and 3 years for 10 µM trabedersen vs chemotherapy. The frequency of patients with related or possibly drug-related adverse events was higher with standard chemotherapy (64%) than with 80 µM trabedersen (43%) and 10 µM trabedersen (27%). Superior efficacy and safety for 10 µM trabedersen over 80 µM trabedersen and chemotherapy and positive risk–benefit assessment suggest it as the optimal dose for further clinical development in high-grade glioma.

1 October 2017 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMartin J. Van Den Bent
Martin J. Van Den Bent
BBBrigitta Baumert
Brigitta Baumert
SESara C Erridge
Sara C Erridge
MVMichael A Vogelbaum
Michael A Vogelbaum
ANAnna K Nowak
Anna K Nowak
JKJohan M Kros
Johan M Kros