Although metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a prognostic factor for cancer occurrence, the association of MetS and cancer mortality remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether MetS, components of MetS and C‐reactive protein (CRP) are associated with cancer mortality in women. A total of 400 cancer deaths, with 140 deaths from obesity‐linked‐cancers (OLCas), [breast (BCa), colorectal, pancreatic and endometrial], linked through the National Death Index, were identified from 10,104 eligible subjects aged ≥18 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for cancer mortality. MetS was associated with increased deaths for total cancer [HR = 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.70] and BCa [HR = 2.1, 95% CI, 1.09–4.11]. The risk of total cancer [HR = 1.7, 95% CI, 1.12–2.68], OLCas [HR = 2.1, 95% CI, 1.00–4.37] and BCa [HR = 3.8, 95% CI, 1.34–10.91] mortality was highest for women with all MetS components abnormal, compared to those without MetS. Linear associations of blood‐pressure [HR = 2.5, 1.02–6.12, Quartile (Q) 4 vs Q1, p trend = 0.004] and blood‐glucose [HR = 2.2, 1.04–4.60, Q4 vs. Q1, p trend = 0.04] with total‐OLCas mortality were observed. A threefold increased risk of BCa mortality was observed for women with enlarged waist circumference, ≥100.9 cm, [HR = 3.5, 1.14–10.51, p trend = 0.008] and in those with increased blood glucose, ≥101 mg/dL, [HR = 3.2, 1.11–9.20, p trend = 0.03] compared to those in Q1. None of the components of MetS were associated with total‐cancer mortality. CRP was not associated with cancer mortality. In conclusion, MetS is associated with total‐cancer and breast‐cancer mortality, with waist circumference, blood pressure and blood glucose as independent predictors of OLCas and BCa mortality.

Background: Colorectal cancer mortality could be decreased with risk-appropriate cancer screening. We examined the efficacy of three tailored interventions compared with usual care for increasing screening adherence. Methods: Women (n = 1,196) ages 51 to 74, from primary care networks and nonadherent to colorectal cancer guidelines, were randomized to (1) usual care, (2) tailored Web intervention, (3) tailored phone intervention, or (4) tailored Web + phone intervention. Average-risk women could select either stool test or colonoscopy, whereas women considered at higher than average risk received an intervention that supported colonoscopy. Outcome data were collected at 6 months by self-report, followed by medical record confirmation (attrition of 23%). Stage of change for colorectal cancer screening (precontemplation or contemplation) was assessed at baseline and 6 months. Results: The phone (41.7%, P < 0.0001) and combined Web + phone (35.8%, P < 0.001) interventions significantly increased colorectal cancer screening by stool test compared with usual care (11.1%), with ORs ranging from 5.4 to 6.8 in models adjusted for covariates. Colonoscopy completion did not differ between groups except that phone significantly increased colonoscopy completion compared with usual care for participants in the highest tertile of self-reported fear of cancer. Conclusions: A tailored phone with or without a Web component significantly increased colorectal cancer screening compared with usual care, primarily through stool testing, and phone significantly increased colonoscopy compared with usual care but only among those with the highest levels of baseline fear. Impact: This study supports tailored phone counseling with or without a Web program for increasing colorectal cancer screening in average-risk women.

Real-world data are limited for patients with brain metastases secondary to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). This study describes real-world outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR⁺/HER2⁻) MBC with brain metastases diagnosis before abemaciclib initiation. A nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified MBC database (January 2011-December 2021) was assessed retrospectively. Patients with HR⁺/HER2⁻ MBC who were treated with abemaciclib (monotherapy or in combination) following diagnosis of brain metastases were included. Real-world best response reflected clinician-documented response assessment of the brain imaging (intracranial) and change in disease burden following radiographic imaging (extracranial); these were reported descriptively. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (rwOS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods from abemaciclib initiation (index date). Among 82 included patients (mean age 57.0 years; 98.8% female), 22.0% and 19.5% received CDK4/6i and chemotherapy before abemaciclib initiation, respectively, and the majority (80.5%) received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Patients mostly received abemaciclib as monotherapy (n = 6) or in combination with endocrine therapy (n = 68). Median TTD was 7.1 (95% CI 4.6-11.3) months, rwPFS was 9.2 (95% CI 6.0-11.6) months, and rwOS was 20.8 (95% CI 13.9-26.0) months. Intracranial and extracranial objective response rates, as determined by treating physicians, were 45.1% (n = 23/51) and 56.7% (n = 34/60), respectively. Intracranial and extracranial clinical benefit rates were 62.7% (n = 32/51) and 70.0% (n = 42/60), respectively. In this real-world study of patients diagnosed with brain metastases and initiating abemaciclib, most patients received radiation/local surgery to the brain before abemaciclib initiation. Although the outcomes in this real-world study are encouraging, it is unclear if the benefit was due to local therapy, abemaciclib, or the combination, and causality cannot be inferred. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefit of this approach.