Background: Inflammation plays a pivotal role in coronary artery disease (CAD). The anti‐inflammatory drug colchicine seems to reduce ischemic events in patients with CAD. So far there is equipoise about its safety and impact on mortality. Methods and Results: To evaluate the utility of colchicine in patients with acute and chronic CAD, we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and conference abstracts were searched from January 1975 to October 2020. Randomized trials assessing colchicine compared with placebo/standard therapy in patients with CAD were included. Data were combined using random‐effects models. The reliability of the available data was tested using trial sequential analyses . Of 3108 citations, 13 randomized trials (n=13 125) were included. Colchicine versus placebo/standard therapy in patients with CAD reduced risk of myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.90; P =0.01; I ² 41%) and stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31–0.81; P =0.005; I ² 0%). But treatment with colchicine compared with placebo/standard therapy had no influence on all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65–1.41; P =0.83; I ² 24%; and OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.22; P =0.45; I ² 0%, respectively). Colchicine increased the risk for gastrointestinal side effects ( P <0.001). According to trial sequential analyses, there is only sufficient evidence for a myocardial infarction risk reduction with colchicine. Conclusions: Among patients with CAD, colchicine reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, but has a higher rate of gastrointestinal upset with no influence on all‐cause mortality.

Introduction Stent underexpansion is a predictor of in-stent-restenosis and stent thrombosis. Semi-compliant balloons (SCBs) are generally used for lesion preparation. It remains unknown whether routine predilatation using non-compliant balloons (NCBs) improves stent expansion in ordinary coronary lesions. Methods The PREdilatation by high-pressure NC balloon catheter for better vessel preparation and Optimal lesion preparation with non-compliant balloons for the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds studies randomised patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction requiring stent implantation to lesion preparation using NCBs versus SCBs. Stent expansion index (SEI-minimal luminal area/mean luminal area on optical coherence tomography) and periprocedural complications were compared. Results We enrolled 104 patients: 53 patients (54 lesions) vs 51 patients (56 lesions) to the NCB and SCB groups, respectively. Predilatation pressure was higher in the NCB group (24±7 atmospheres (atm) vs 14±3 atm, p<0.0001). Postdilatation using NCBs was performed in 41 (76%) lesions vs 46 (82%) lesions pretreated with NCBs versus SCBs (p=0.57). Similar pressures were used for postdilatation with NCB in both groups (23±8 atm vs 23±9 atm, p=0.65). SEI after stent implantation was 0.88±0.13 in the NCB vs 0.85±0.14 in the SCB group (p=0.18). After postdilatation, SEI increased to 0.94±0.13 in the NCB group vs 0.88±0.13 in the SCB group (p=0.02). No relevant complications occurred. Conclusions In simple coronary lesions, predilatation/postdilatation with NCBs at high pressures appears to result in better scaffold and stent expansion. Using SCBs only for predilatation might lead to inadequate stent expansion and postdilatation with NCBs might only partially correct this. Predilatation and postdilatation using NCBs at high pressure is safe. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03518645.

Objective Approximately 10% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have no obstructive coronary artery disease. The prognosis and role of intensified antiplatelet therapy in those patients were evaluated. Methods We analysed data from the Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events–Seventh Organisation to Assess Strategies in Ischaemic Symptoms trial randomising patients with ACS referred for early intervention to receive either double-dose (600 mg, day 1; 150 mg, days 2–7; then 75 mg/day) or standard-dose (300 mg, day 1; then 75 mg/day) clopidogrel. Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus those with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and their relation to standard-dose versus double-dose clopidogrel were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 days. Results We included 23 783 patients with MI and 1599 (6.7%) with MINOCA. Patients with MINOCA were younger, presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation MI and had fewer comorbidities. All-cause mortality (0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), CV mortality (0.6% vs 2.2%, p=0.006), repeat MI (0.5% vs 2.3%, p=0.001) and major bleeding (0.6% vs 2.4%, p<0.0001) were lower among patients with MINOCA than among those with obstructive CAD. Among patients with MINOCA, 2.1% of patients in the double-dose clopidogrel group and 0.6% in the standard-dose group experienced a primary outcome (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 9.76), whereas in those with obstructive CAD, rates were 4.3% and 4.7%, respectively (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p value for interaction=0.011). Conclusions Patients with MINOCA are at lower risk of recurrent CV events compared with patients with MI with obstructive CAD. Compared with a standard clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen, an intensified dosing strategy appears to offer no additional benefit with a signal of possible harm. Further randomised trials evaluating the effects of potent DAPT in patients with MINOCA are warranted. Trial registration number NCT00335452.

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) face an increased risk of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We aimed to assess the predictive value of the novel atrial‐specific biomarker BMP10 (bone morphogenetic protein 10) for death and MACE in patients with AF in comparison with NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal prohormone of B‐type natriuretic peptide). Methods and Results: BMP10 and NT‐proBNP were measured in patients with AF enrolled in Swiss‐AF (Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Study), a prospective multicenter cohort study. A total of 2219 patients were included (median follow‐up 4.3 years [interquartile range 3.9, 5.1], mean age 73±9 years, 73% male). In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) associated with 1 ng/mL increase of BMP10 was 1.60 (95% CI, 1.37–1.87) for all‐cause death, and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.35–1.76) for MACE. For all‐cause death, the concordance index was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.763–0.809) for BMP10, 0.784 (95% CI, 0.765–0.810) for NT‐proBNP, and 0.789 (95% CI, 0.771–0.815) for both biomarkers combined. For MACE, the concordance index was 0.732 (95% CI, 0.715–0.754) for BMP10, 0.747 (95% CI, 0.731–0.768) for NT‐proBNP, and 0.750 (95% CI, 0.734–0.771) for both biomarkers combined. When grouping patients according to NT‐proBNP categories (900 ng/L), higher aHRs were observed in patients with high BMP10 in the categories of low NT‐proBNP (all‐cause death aHR, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.15–4.52], MACE aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.07–3.28]) and high NT‐proBNP (all‐cause death aHR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.14–2.26], MACE aHR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.07–1.80]). Conclusions: BMP10 strongly predicted all‐cause death and MACE in patients with AF. BMP10 provided additional prognostic information in low‐ and high‐risk patients according to NT‐proBNP stratification. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02105844.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of angina and exercise intolerance in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. The efficacy of ranolazine, a late sodium channel blocker, in patients with symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease is well established. To evaluate the efficacy of ranolazine in CMD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and conference abstracts were searched from January 1975 to March 2020. Randomized trials evaluating ranolazine in patients with CMD were screened. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. End points of interest included a change in angina measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and clinical outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models. Of 836 citations, 6 randomized studies (318 patients) were included. Median follow-up was 4 weeks. When pooling the 6 trials analyzing ranolazine, we found that patients treated with ranolazine had a higher SAQ value regarding physical functioning (mean difference, 6.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41; 10.42) quality of life (10.07; 95% CI, 3.4; 16.74), and angina stability (20.14; 95% CI, 10.12; 30.17), as well as improved CFR (0.27; 95% CI, 0.09; 0.45) compared with placebo/control therapy. A high heterogeneity was observed (range I2, 30%-84%). In CMD, ranolazine may be associated with improvements in CFR and some of the SAQ domains, including angina stability, physical functioning, and quality of life. However, it does not seem to beneficially impact angina frequency and treatment satisfaction. It is also unknown if it improves prognosis of afflicted patients.

Background—: Increasing height is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We hypothesized that height-related differences in electric conduction could be potential mediators of this relationship. Methods and Results—: We enrolled 2149 adults aged 25 to 41 years from the general population. Height was directly measured, and a resting 12-lead ECG obtained under standardized conditions. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between measured height and ECG parameters. Mendelian randomization analyses were then performed using 655 independent height-associated genetic variants previously identified in the GIANT consortium. Median age was 37 years, and median height was 1.71 m. Median PR interval, QRS duration, and QTc interval were 156, 88, and 402 ms, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, β-coefficients (95% confidence intervals) per 10 cm increase in measured height were 4.17 (2.65–5.69; P <0.0001) for PR interval and 2.06 (1.54–2.58; P <0.0001) for QRS duration. Height was not associated with QTc interval or the Sokolow–Lyon index. An increase of 10 cm in genetically determined height was associated with increases of 4.33 ms (0.76–7.96; P =0.02) in PR interval and 2.57 ms (1.33–3.83; P <0.0001) in QRS duration but was not related to QTc interval or Sokolow–Lyon index. Conclusions—: In this large population-based study, we found significant associations of measured and genetically determined height with PR interval and QRS duration. Our findings suggest that adult height is a marker of altered cardiac conduction and that these relationships may be causal.