Oliver T Coomes

Dr. Oliver T Coomes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 August 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes
YTYoshito Takasaki
Yoshito Takasaki
JRJeanine M. Rhemtulla
Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
In this article we illustrate how fine-grained longitudinal analyses of land holding and land use among forest peasant households in an Amazonian village can enrich our understanding of the poverty/land cover nexus. We examine the dynamic links in shifting cultivation systems among asset poverty, land use, and land cover in a community where poverty is persistent and primary forests have been replaced over time—with community enclosure—by secondary forests (i.e., fallows), orchards, and crop land. Land cover change is assessed using aerial photographs/satellite imagery from 1965 to 2007. Household and plot level data are used to track land holding, portfolios, and use as well as land cover over the past 30 y, with particular attention to forest status (type and age). Our analyses find evidence for two important types of “land-use” poverty traps—a “subsistence crop” trap and a “short fallow” trap—and indicate that the initial conditions of land holding by forest peasants have long-term effects on future forest cover and household welfare. These findings suggest a new mechanism driving poverty traps: insufficient initial land holdings induce land use patterns that trap households in low agricultural productivity. Path dependency in the evolution of household land portfolios and land use strategies strongly influences not only the wellbeing of forest people but also the dynamics of tropical deforestation and secondary forest regrowth.

8 November 2010 in Fisheries Management and Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes
YTY. Takasaki
Y. Takasaki
CAC. Abizaid
C. Abizaid
BBB. L. Barham
B. L. Barham

1 January 2016 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNavin Ramankutty
Navin Ramankutty
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes
Ramankutty, N., and O. T. Coomes. 2016. Land-use regime shifts: an analytical framework and agenda for future land-use research. Ecology and Society 21(2):1.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08370-210201

17 February 2016 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes
BMBenjamin C. Miltner
Benjamin C. Miltner

21 January 2010 in Review of Development Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YTYoshito Takasaki
Yoshito Takasaki
BBBradford L. Barham
Bradford L. Barham
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes

3 March 2017 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHIgnacia Holmes
Ignacia Holmes
CPCatherine Potvin
Catherine Potvin
OCOliver T Coomes
Oliver T Coomes
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) offers developing countries an opportunity to engage in global climate change mitigation through the sale of carbon credits for reforestation, avoided deforestation and forest conservation projects. Funding for REDD+ projects has increased in recent years and REDD+ projects have proliferated, but relatively few studies have, as yet, examined their implementation. Here, we present a synthesis of the challenges and lessons learned while implementing a REDD+ project in an Emberá community in Panama. Our case study, documented in four cycles of collaborative action research over 11 years, examines how local communities sought to reduce emissions from deforestation and benefit from carbon offset trading while improving local livelihoods. Through semi-structured interviews and participatory methods, we found that success with REDD+ hinges on broader issues than those widely discussed in the literature and in policy circles. Though economic incentives for participants and the equitable distribution of benefits remain important to project participants, our study finds that, in adapting REDD+ strategies to best suit community needs, the role of a support system for implementation (“bridging institutions”) and REDD+’s potential as a conflict resolution mechanism for tenure issues deserve more attention as key factors that contribute to meaningful participation in REDD+.