Sue-Young Choi

Ms. Sue-Young Choi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 November 2024 in Journal of Building Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSoo-Jin Lee
Soo-Jin Lee
SCSue-Young Choi
Sue-Young Choi
SSSeung-Yeong Song
Seung-Yeong Song

26 May 2026 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSue-Young Choi
Sue-Young Choi
SLSoo-Jin Lee
Soo-Jin Lee
SSSeung-Yeong Song
Seung-Yeong Song

21 January 2026 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSue-Young Choi
Sue-Young Choi
SLSoojin Lee
Soojin Lee
SSSeung-Yeong Song
Seung-Yeong Song
The building sector accounts for approximately 30% of global energy use. The demand for energy-efficient, high-performance buildings is increasing given the increasing awareness of the climate crisis. The building envelope greatly influences overall building energy performance. Considering the broad shift from passive to adaptive systems, smart window technologies are attracting attention. Despite their potential, few scholars have examined occupant comfort in spaces with smart windows. This gap is addressed herein by comparatively analyzing occupants’ responses to thermal and visual environments in a room with a smart window (RoomSW) and a room with a conventional window (RoomCW) in a residential building in winter. The smart window is operated via a glare-prevention tint control strategy. The results reveal that under thermal conditions comparable to those in an actual dwelling, wintertime smart window tinting for glare prevention does not decrease occupants’ thermal sensation or satisfaction. Regarding visual comfort, conditions in RoomSW and RoomCW satisfy the minimum illuminance requirement of 200 lx, but glare occurs in RoomCW with a mean New Daylight Glare Index (DGIN) of 24.1, compared to 9.6 in RoomSW. Questionnaire results indicate greater satisfaction with the luminous environment in RoomSW relative to RoomCW, with scores of +1.4 and +0.2, respectively.

23 December 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
SCSue-Young Choi
Sue-Young Choi
SLSoojin Lee
Soojin Lee
SSSeung-Yeong Song
Seung-Yeong Song
The building sector accounts for approximately 30% of global energy use. The demand for energy-efficient, high-performance buildings is increasing given the increasing awareness of the climate crisis. The building envelope greatly influences overall building energy performance. Considering the broad shift from passive to adaptive systems, smart window technologies are attracting attention. Despite their potential, few scholars have examined occupant comfort in spaces with smart windows. This gap is addressed herein by comparatively analyzing occupants’ responses to thermal and visual environments in a room with a smart window (RoomSW) and a room with a conventional window (RoomCW) in a residential building in winter. The smart window is operated via a glare-prevention tint control strategy, whereby the tint level is adjusted stepwise when glare occurs. The results reveal that under thermal conditions comparable to those in an actual dwelling, winter-time smart window tinting for glare prevention does not decrease occupants’ thermal sensation or satisfaction. Regarding visual comfort, the conditions in both the RoomSW and RoomCW satisfy the minimum indoor illuminance requirements, but glare occurs in the RoomCW. The questionnaire results indicate greater satisfaction with the luminous environment in the RoomSW relative to the RoomCW. This difference is statistically significant (p < 0.05).