It is possible that parasites may influence the course of COVID-19 infection, as either risk factors or protective agents; as such, the current coronavirus pandemic may affect the diagnosis and prevention of parasitic disease, and its elimination programs. The present review highlights the similarity between the symptoms of human parasitoses and those of COVID-19 and discuss their mutual influence. The study evaluated selected human parasitoses with similar symptoms to COVID-19 and examined their potential influence on SARS-CoV-2 virus invasion. The available data suggest that at least several human parasitoses could result in misdiagnosis of COVID-19. Some disorders, such as malaria, schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths, can increase the risk of severe infection with COVID-19. It is also suggested that recovery from parasitic disease can enhance the immune system and protect from COVID-19 infection. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected parasitic disease elimination programs in endemic regions and influenced the number of diagnoses of human parasitoses.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The three key principles in management of the COVID-19 pandemic are prevention, early detection and targeted treatment. Vaccine-based prevention together with early detection has already proven its efficacy in controlling the pandemic. Early detection of infected patients could substantially accelerate the implementation of treatment, but also help to identify infection hotspots, whereas targeted treatment might destroy the virus and minimize damage to healthy tissue. Nanoparticles hold great promise with respect to these aspects. They may also be the solution to emerging clinical problems such as reinfection, pregnancy-related COVID-19 and coinfection. Here, we aim to discuss the potential applications of nanoparticles to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is a life-threatening complication in the cases of patients with hematologic malignancies. In December 2019, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of...

Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has remained a challenge for governments and healthcare systems all around the globe. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with increased rates of hospital admissions and significant mortality. The pandemic increased the rate of cardiac arrest and the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). COVID-19, with its pathophysiology and detrimental effects on healthcare, influenced the profile of patients suffering from cardiac arrest, as well as the conditions of performing CPR. To ensure both the safety of medical personnel and the CPR efficacy for patients, resuscitation societies have published modified guidelines addressing the specific reality of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this review, we briefly describe the transmission and pathophysiology of COVID-19, present the challenges of CPR in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, summarize the current recommendations regarding the algorithms of basic life support (BLS), advanced life support (ALS) and pediatric life support, and discuss other aspects of CPR in COVID-19 patients, which potentially affect the risk-to-benefit ratio of medical procedures and therefore should be considered while formulating further recommendations.

Background: Parvovirus B19 (B19V; Erythroparvovirus primate 1) is now the most commonly detected virus in human endomyocardial biopsies from patients with myocarditis or dilated cardiomyopathy; however, its true causal role remains uncertain. By contrast, Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1, also known as canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2), is an apparent cause of myocarditis in neonatal puppies, where it replicates in cardiomyocytes, induces extensive cell death, and often leaves fibrotic scars in survivors. Conclusions: This review compares B19V and CPV-2 from basic biology to clinical expression. Divergent tropism and replication kinetics produce distinct injury patterns: predominantly endothelial and microvascular dysfunction with immune-mediated damage in adult human B19V infection versus direct, age-restricted cardiomyocyte lysis in neonatal CPV-2 infection, often followed by fibrosis. Because parvoviral DNA can persist in cardiac tissue, detection alone does not prove causality. We advocate an “evidence bundle” integrating viral load by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), detection of viral transcripts and/or proteins when feasible, spatial co-localization with histological injury, and concordant clinical markers (cardiac troponins and advanced imaging, including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMR]) to support etiologic attribution and guide management in human and veterinary cardiology.

Patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) are rarely tested for the presence of neurovirulent viruses other than tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV); however, such coinfections could be of clinical importance. The aim of the study was to search for the presence of neurotropic viruses in a LNB patients. Fourteen patients admitted with signs and symptoms of neuroinfection who were eventually diagnosed to have LNB (according to the guidelines of the European Federation of Neurological Societies) were subjects of the study. Sera and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected at the time of initial presentation were tested for viral pathogens most common in our geographical area: human enteroviruses (EV), herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus type 6, human adenoviruses, and TBEV using PCR/RT-PCR and serological assays. RNA and DNA-based metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was used to detect other viral pathogens. EV was detected in CSF from two (14 %) LNB patients and viral loads were similar (220 and 270 copies/ml). The mMGS analysis were performed on CSFs from 10 patients and generated a total 213,750,885 NGS reads, 0.05 % of which were viral. However, none of potential pathogens fulfilled the criteria for positive viral detection by mNGS. Using a number of PCR/RT-PCR assays and mNGS we identified EV infection in two out of 14 LNB patients. The possible co-occurrence of enterovirus and Lyme neuroborreliosis infections may warrant further research.