Aberrant expression of stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) is implicated in cancer development. STC2 acts as a tumor promoter to drive some cancers. However, its contribution to the development of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. This study showed that the expression of STC2 was significantly upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues. Moreover, its expression was positively correlated with tumor size and lymph node metastasis and negatively correlated with 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer patients. Additionally, the expression levels of STC2 were a novel biomarker for predicting overall survival rate after surgery. Furthermore, overexpression of STC2 could promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of pancreatic cancer cell lines, while knocking down of STC2 led to antiproliferation and antimetastasis activities. Further mechanistic investigations revealed that the expression of STC2 could significantly promote the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in pancreatic cancer cells. These data indicated that the overexpression of STC2 in pancreatic cancer contributes to the metastasis through the promotion of EMT, suggesting that STC2 is a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.

Background To explore the correlation between the levels of D-dimer (D-D), fibrinogen (FIB), fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and platelets (PLT) in peripheral blood of patients with lower limb fractures and the formation of deep vein thrombosis in lower limbs, and to establish a new thrombosis prediction model for patients with lower limb fractures. Methods The patients were divided into DVT group and non DVT group according to whether there was deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. The differences in the levels of D-D, FIB, FDP and platelets between the two groups were analyzed and compared. ROC curve was used to evaluate the levels of D-D, FIB, FDP and PLT in the peripheral blood of patients with lower extremity fracture to predict the formation of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related risk factors of deep vein thrombosis, and the corresponding nomogram risk prediction model of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in patients with lower limb fractures was drawn according to the regression coefficient, which was verified by calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and consistency index (C-index). Results The levels of D-D, FIB, FDP, and PLT in the DVT group were higher than those in the non DVT group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05); Moreover, FIB is superior to D-D, FDP, and PLT in predicting the risk of fractures and thrombosis, while PLT has the weakest predictive power. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that platelet, D-D, FIB and FDP were independent risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in patients with lower limb fractures (P < 0.05); Based on the independent risk factors mentioned above, the complex logistic regression formula was transformed into a visual column chart, and the consistency index (C-index) was 0.962 and 0.936, and the external verification C-index was 0.841. The calibration curve showed that the nomogram is in high agreement with the actual results. The AUC value of ROC curve indicated that the nomogram has high prediction value. Conclusions The levels of D-D, FIB, FDP and PLT in peripheral blood of patients with lower limb fracture and DVT were significantly increased. Early monitoring of D-D, FIB, FDP and PLT levels in patients with lower limb fracture can effectively screen for lower limb deep vein thrombosis.

Background: To analyze and explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided femoral nerve block combined with modified swelling anesthetic solution in high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein.Methods: 90 patients with varicose great saphenous vein of lower limbs undergoing high ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein were randomly divided into group A (femoral nerve block combined with modified swelling anesthesia), group B (simple swelling anesthesia) and group C (epidural anesthesia), with 30 patients in each group. The serum CRP level, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization cost, postoperative VAS score, preoperative and postoperative VCSS score, intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate, postoperative related complications, and patients, satisfaction with diagnosis and treatment were compared among the three groups.Results: There was no significant difference in operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative VCSS scores among the three groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative VAS score and total hospitalization cost of patients in group A and B were lower than those in group C, and the postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative VAS score in group A were more significant (P < 0.05). Compared with group B, the fluctuation range of intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate, and postoperative serum CRP level in group A and C were lower, especially in group A (P < 0.05). The three groups of patients were followed up regularly after surgery. The results showed that the number of postoperative complications in group A was lower than that in the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the postoperative complications of the three groups were effectively relieved after symptomatic treatment (dressing change, anti-infection, taking drugs to improve circulation, etc.). The satisfaction of patients in group A was significantly higher than that in groups B and C (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Ultrasound guided femoral nerve block combined with modified swelling anesthetic solution applied in high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein can significantly improve postoperative inflammatory stress reaction of patients, effectively ensure the safety and reliability of surgical progress, help to improve analgesia effect and accelerate physical rehabilitation, and has short hospitalization time, low medical cost, and high satisfaction of patients' diagnosis and treatment, which is worthy of widespread clinical promotion and reference.

Background: Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) is a rare disease with abdominal pain as the main clinical manifestation, but its optimal treatment strategy has not yet been determined. Based on this, this study explored a safe and effective treatment method by analyzing and comparing the safety and efficacy of conservative treatment and endovascular treatment in SISMAD patients.Methods: The clinical and imaging data and treatment effects of 85 patients with SISMAD who were admitted to the General Surgery Department of the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from January 2008 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Two groups were treated, the data of patients in conservative treatment group and endovascular treatment group were analyzed, and a safe and effective treatment method for SISMAD was discussed.Results: The mean follow-up time was 36.58 ± 25.03 months. The success rate of interventional operation was 86.11% (31/36), and the operation failed because the guide wire could not enter the true lumen in four cases. One case was terminated due to poor physical condition of the patient who could not tolerate surgery. There were no significant differences in gender, body mass index, clinical manifestations, and past history between conservative treatment and endovascular treatment (P > 0.05), but in age, superior mesenteric artery-distal aorta angle, distance from the superior mesenteric artery opening to dissection, dissection length, and true lumen stenosis. There was a statistical difference between the two groups in the rate and Yun classification (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Conservative treatment is effective for most symptomatic SISMAD patients, and close monitoring is required; for patients with persistent symptoms and severe true lumen stenosis (especially Yun classification type III), endovascular treatment is preferred; endovascular treatment is mainly based on endovascular bare stent placement. Patients receiving stent implantation may suffer from stent stenosis or occlusion in the long term, and most of them have no obvious symptoms of intestinal ischemia; the prognosis is good.