Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for most patients with non-metastatic HCC. In recent years, the management of patients with HCC has considerably changed, thanks to the improvement of molecular biology knowledge and the introduction of immunotherapy. To date, systemic therapy is authorized in the Western world only in patients with advanced HCC. However, this therapy could not only stabilize the tumour disease or improve survival but could display excellent response and lead to downstaging of the tumour that finally permits LT. There are increasing reports of patients that have performed LT after pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, due to the intrinsic mechanism of ICIs, graft rejection might be favoured. In addition, chronic adverse effects affecting other organs may also appear after the end of therapy. This review aims to evaluate the readiness and outcomes of LT in patients with advanced HCC who have previously undergone treatment with ICIs. It seeks to identify the challenges, risks, and benefits associated with this conversion therapy. The integration of ICIs into the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC necessitates a nuanced approach to LT. While early evidence supports the feasibility of LT following ICIs therapy, there is an urgent need for standardized guidelines and more extensive longitudinal studies to optimize patient selection, timing, and post-transplant management.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is defined by hepatic steatosis in individuals with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, most commonly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). People with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, even without other metabolic factors, have a higher risk of T2DM. MASLD includes isolated liver steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma. MASLD patients are also at a higher risk of developing T2DM than the general population. International guidelines recommend a stepwise approach for identifying those at high risk of fibrotic progression, using the FIB-4 index for initial screening, followed by transient elastography. The link between MASLD and T2DM is notable due to shared pathophysiological mechanisms, some of which are reversible with treatment used in T2DM. Many new glucose-lowering drugs have also proven effective in improving anthropometric and metabolic parameters, as well as the stage of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Recent evidence suggests that GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is have beneficial effects in MASLD patients with T2DM. Specifically, GLP-1RAs improve hepatic insulin signaling, modulate lipid metabolism, reduce inflammation, and decrease hepatocyte oxidative stress. European guidelines recommend resmetirom as a MASH-targeted therapy, if locally approved, for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥ 2) and GLP-1RAs in MASH, including compensated cirrhosis, but they should be used for their respective indications, such as T2DM and obesity. Given the post-COVID burden of MASLD and its high risk of liver fibrosis progression among T2DM patients, this review specifically provides an overview of the complex relationship between MASLD and T2DM. Additionally, it examines current understanding of liver fibrosis evaluation and the effects of novel treatment options, with a particular focus on glucose-lowering therapies and their effects on necroinflammation, hepatic fat accumulation, and fibrosis progression in patients with MASLD and T2DM.

Background/Objectives. Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer and represents the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis of HCC remains poor, largely due to late-stage presentation and high rates of vascular invasion. Portal vein thrombosis constitutes a significant complication of HCC, with an occurrence rate of 35–50%. Portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) represents an aggressive form that is closely linked to decreased patient survival. The incidence of PVTT increases over time, from approximately 21% in the first year after diagnosis to nearly 46% by the third year, highlighting its high prevalence and progressive nature. The introduction of immunotherapy has marked a paradigm shift in the management of HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly those targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways, have demonstrated durable responses and significant survival benefits in certain patients with advanced HCC. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that combining immunotherapy with local or systemic therapies, such as trans arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, radiotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, may further enhance antitumor efficacy by modulating the tumour microenvironment and promoting synergistic immune activation. Method: This narrative review provides a comprehensive evaluation of immunotherapy in patients with HCC and PVTT, with a focus on its efficacy as both monotherapy and in combination with other treatment modalities in terms of tumour response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. It also addresses safety, patient selection, and emerging strategies to optimize outcomes in this high-risk population. Conclusions: The combination of multiple therapies could improve the patient’s prognosis by achieving objective response rate of almost 82%, disease control rate of 97% and progression free survival of 12.9 months with quadruple therapy (HAIC-TACE combined with targeted and immunotherapy).

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for most patients with non-metastatic HCC. In recent years, the management of patients with HCC has changed considerably, thanks to the improvement of molecular biology knowledge and the introduction of immunotherapy. To date, systemic therapy is authorized in the Western world only in patients with advanced HCC. However, this therapy could lead not only to stabilize the tumour disease or improve survival but could display excellent response and lead to downstaging of the tumor that finally permits liver transplantation. There are increasing reports of patients that have performed liver transplantation after pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, due to the intrinsic mechanism of ICIs to stimulate the immune response against tumors, they could also cause graft rejection. This review aims to evaluate the readiness and outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with advanced HCC who have previously undergone treatment with ICIs. It seeks to identify the challenges, risks, and benefits associated with this conversion therapy. The integration of ICIs into the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC necessitates a nuanced approach to liver transplantation. While early evidence supports the feasibility of LT following ICI therapy, there is an urgent need for standardized guidelines and more extensive longitudinal studies to optimize patient selection, timing, and post-transplant management.