Vladimir Djan

Dr. Vladimir Djan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2026 in Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VDVladimir Djan
Vladimir Djan
VGVladimir Galić
Vladimir Galić
NGNemanja Galetić
Nemanja Galetić
RKRastislava Krasnik
Rastislava Krasnik
SBStanislava Bodonji
Stanislava Bodonji
JNJelena Mačar Novaković
Jelena Mačar Novaković
Introduction: Idiopathic adolescent scoliosis (IAS) is commonly managed non-surgically; however, patients with a Cobb angle >45° before skeletal maturity often require posterior spinal fusion. Because this procedure carries a risk of neurological complications, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is essential for early detection of spinal cord compromise. Case report: We present a 13-year-old girl with rapidly progressing scoliosis (Cobb angle 78°) who developed intraoperative changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during posterior fusion from L4 to Th2. Total intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxants was used, and standard multimodal IONM with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), MEPs, and spontaneous/triggered electromyography was applied. After induction of general anesthesia and surgical exposure, pedicle preparation at Th8–Th9 was followed by increased bleeding from the vertebral bodies and an abrupt loss of MEPs in both lower limbs, most prominently in the tibialis anterior muscles, whilst SSEPs remained unchanged. Intraoperative radiography confirmed correct screw placement, and anesthetic variables were reassessed with no reversible cause identified. Because MEPs remained absent, a wake-up test was performed and demonstrated intact voluntary movement, allowing the surgery to continue. By the end of the procedure, MEPs recovered fully on the left side and partially on the right. The patient awoke without any postoperative motor deficit. Conclusion: It is well known that motor responses can show variability during surgery, including a gradual decrease due to prolonged anesthesia. After excluding anesthetic and mechanical factors, one of the hypothetical explanations for the transient MEP loss was temporary venous congestion and retrograde flow within the intravertebral and epidural/intraspinal venous networks, resulting in reversible spinal cord drainage impairment. Another hypothetical possibility was transient vasospasm from surgical manipulation without direct neural or vascular injury. This case highlights the critical role of continuous multimodal neuromonitoring in detecting reversible spinal cord dysfunction and guiding safe decision-making during complex scoliosis surgery.