Zejian Deng

Zejian Deng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 January 2026 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFeng Peng
Feng Peng
SSShangju She
Shangju She
ZDZejian Deng
Zejian Deng
Recent advances in Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong cross-modal reasoning capabilities, offering new opportunities for decision-making in autonomous driving. However, existing end-to-end approaches still suffer from limited semantic consistency, weak task controllability, and insufficient interpretability. To address these challenges, we propose SemAlign-E2E (Semantic-Aligned End-to-End), a semantic-aligned multimodal LVLM framework that unifies visual, LiDAR, and task-oriented textual inputs through cross-modal attention. This design enables end-to-end reasoning from scene understanding to high-level driving command generation. Beyond producing structured control instructions, the framework also provides natural-language explanations to enhance interpretability. We conduct extensive evaluations on the nuScenes dataset and CARLA simulation platform. Experimental results show that SemAlign-E2E achieves substantial improvements in driving stability, safety, multi-task generalization, and semantic comprehension, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Notably, the framework exhibits superior behavioral consistency and risk-aware decision-making in complex traffic scenarios. These findings highlight the potential of LVLM-driven semantic reasoning for autonomous driving and provide a scalable pathway toward future semantic-enhanced end-to-end driving systems.

20 October 2026
Verified
Dataset
Open access
ZWZian Wang
Zian Wang
WHWenjie Huang
Wenjie Huang
ZDZejian Deng
Zejian Deng
YSYiming Shu
Yiming Shu
JXJiahui Xu
Jiahui Xu
CSChen Sun
Chen Sun
This package contains the numerical propagated interaction-field model, context-conditioned physics-informed neural network (PINN), field-aware reinforcement-learning pipeline, and processed measurements supporting the principal validation and simulator findings. The statistical workflow preserves the original observation/reward factorial and replaces only its complete-model merge candidate with the selected 0.25-times comfort profile. All five calibrated merging Soft Actor-Critic checkpoints and their five paired stock checkpoints are included. Policy-training seeds are 0-4; each policy is evaluated on traffic seeds 10000-10049 at density 0.3. The calibrated profile uses jerk weight 0.000375 and steering/throttle-change weights 0.00025. An indexed mapping connects each checkpoint to its effective training settings and episode CSV. The PINN checkpoint is accompanied by its available architecture, input channels, normalization, numerical-solver settings, loss weights, calibration-cache signatures, hardware record, training duration and 6,000-step loss history.

26 September 2026 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXuhao Yue
Xuhao Yue
FPFeng Peng
Feng Peng
ZDZejian Deng
Zejian Deng
HLHaoran Li
Haoran Li
CSChuan Sun
Chuan Sun
HSHaiming Sun
Haiming Sun
At autonomous intersections in mixed traffic, where Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) coexist with Human-Driven Vehicles (HDVs), scheduling must remain effective even when a reliable explicit HDV turning intention is not available sufficiently early for the scheduling decision. This paper proposes a learning-based platoon scheduling method for this information-limited setting. CAVs and HDVs are organized into mixed platoons or an HDV group, and a state-augmentation function is designed to encode their temporal relationship while preserving the priority of uncontrollable HDVs. An enumeration (EN)-based expert demonstration mechanism is further integrated into the training process to provide high-quality experience. In the representative training run reported in the manuscript, the expert-assisted model achieved a peak average reward approximately 14% higher than the model trained without demonstrations. Across the tested demand cases, the learned scheduler also obtained travel-cost performance close to the EN benchmark. The scope of the method is explicitly limited to the modeled lane-keeping and sensing assumptions; robustness to random seeds, unexpected HDV maneuvers, communication delays, and additional safety metrics requires dedicated validation.