Nico Ploner

Nico Ploner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNico Ploner
Nico Ploner
MNMarkus F Neurath
Markus F Neurath
MSMartin Schoenthaler
Martin Schoenthaler
AZAndreas Zielke
Andreas Zielke
HPHans-Ulrich Prokosch
Hans-Ulrich Prokosch

1 January 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
NPNico Ploner
Nico Ploner
PHProkosch Hans-Ulrich
Prokosch Hans-Ulrich
Both patients and physicians of the University Hospital of Erlangen would welcome means of digital data exchange between patients and the hospital. This work presents a system's architecture, FHIR based data model, security measures, and application flow based on patient's smartphones and a public cloud infrastructure to obtain patient reported outcome measures and merge that information with clinical routine data.

19 March 2026 in Virtual Worlds
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Navid AshrafiNavid Ashrafi
Navid Ashrafi
PGPhilipp Graf
Philipp Graf
MMManuela Marquardt
Manuela Marquardt
PHPhilipp Harnisch
Philipp Harnisch
SHStefan Hillmann
Stefan Hillmann
JVJan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
The collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a key measurement tool for patient-centred care. At the same time, collecting these measures poses obstacles for many patients, leading to these groups being underrepresented in the data. We have therefore developed a multimodal, AI-driven assistance system to support patients in collecting these data. The interface of the system comprised a digital tablet containing the PROM questionnaire items and the assistant in three forms of embodiment: A virtual avatar, a physical avatar, and a voice-only agent. To evaluate the users’ experience and ratings of the system, two separate studies were implemented in two rehabilitation centers with 195 patients. A mixed within–between RCT was conducted at an outpatient clinic, where patients completed PROMs both with and without an assistant, and a between-subject design at an inpatient clinic comparing routine PC-based care with avatar- and robot-assisted PROM administration. Our results suggest a preference for the non-assisted tablet-only condition in Clinic A, whereas, in Clinic B, both agent conditions were preferred over routine care. We have further analyzed aspects such as trust and social presence in this study to gain a more thorough understanding of the users’ experience. Our analysis shows a higher trust rating for the voice-only assistant, whereas the robot, virtual avatar, and the voice-only conditions were perceived as more socially present. The impact of demographic factors and affinity for technology on the user ratings was also thoroughly studied. Our findings shed light on the role of agent embodiment in PROM assistance and contribute to the future design and evaluation of effective, engaging, and trustworthy systems for data collection in healthcare settings.