Glofitamab is a CD3xCD20 bi‐specific antibody with two fragments directed to the CD20 antigen and a single CD3‐binding fragment. Encouraging response and survival rates were recently reported in a pivotal phase II expansion trial conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B‐cell lymphoma. However, the real‐world data of patients of all ages with no strict selection criteria are still lacking. Herein, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who received glofitamab via compassionate use in Turkey. Forty‐three patients from 20 centers who received at least one dose of the treatment were included in this study. The median age was 54 years. The median number of previous therapies was 4, and 23 patients were refractory to first‐line treatment. Twenty patients had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. The median follow‐up time was 5.7 months. In efficacy‐evaluable patients, 21% and 16% of them achieved complete response and partial response, respectively. The median response duration was 6.3 months. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.3 and 8.8 months, respectively. None of the treatment‐responsive patients progressed during the study period, and their estimated 1‐year PFS and OS rate was 83%. The most frequently reported toxicity was hematological toxicity. Sixteen patients survived, while 27 died at the time of the analysis. The most common cause of death was disease progression. One patient died of cytokine release syndrome during the first cycle after receiving the first dose of glofitamab. Meanwhile, two patients died due to glofitamab‐related febrile neutropenia. This is the largest real‐world study on the effectiveness and toxicity of glofitamab treatment in R/R DLBCL patients. The median OS of 9 months seems promising in this heavily pretreated group. The toxicity related mortality rates were the primary concerns in this study.

Objective: Patients with solid malignancies are more vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than the healthy population. The outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in highly immunosuppressed populations, such as in patients with hematological malignancies, is a point of interest. We aimed to analyze the symptoms, complications, intensive care unit admissions, and mortality rates of patients with hematological malignancies infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Turkey. Materials and Methods: In this multicenter study, we included 340 adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 from March to November 2020. Diagnosis and status of primary disease, treatment schedules for hematological malignancies, time from last treatment, life expectancy related to the hematological disease, and comorbidities were recorded, together with data regarding symptoms, treatment, and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: Forty four patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis of SARSCoV-2 infection. Among symptomatic patients, fever, cough, and dyspnea were observed in 62.6%, 48.8%, and 41.8%, respectively. Sixtynine (20%) patients had mild SARS-CoV-2 disease, whereas moderate, severe, and critical disease was reported in 101 (29%), 71 (20%), and 55 (16%) patients, respectively. Of the entire cohort, 251 (73.8%) patients were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2. Mortality related to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 26.5% in the entire cohort; this comprised 4.4% of those patients with mild disease, 12.4% of those with moderate disease, and 83% of those with severe or critical disease. Active hematological disease, lower life expectancy related to primary hematological disease, neutropenia at diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, ICU admission, and first-line therapy used for coronavirus disease-2019 treatment were found to be related to higher mortality rates. Treatments with hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin were associated with a higher rate of mortality in comparison to favipiravir use. Conclusion: Patients with hematological malignancy infected with SARS-CoV-2 have an increased risk of severe disease and mortality.

The prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is not clear in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study was designed to analyze the GNRI in DLBCL patients and to investigate its prognostic value in DLBCL. The archive records of DLBCL patients between 2008 and 2020 at the Akdeniz University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 206 patients with DLBCL were recruited and classified into two GNRI-based groups based on nutrition status. The GNRI cut off value was determined by ROC analysis. In the univariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS), age, lactate dehydrogenase, B symptoms, infiltration of bone marrow, and the GNRI were determined as prognostic factors for mortality. The OS of patients with a GNRI ≤104.238 was significantly lower than that of patients with a GNRI >104.238 (p = 0.001). The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with GNRI ≤104.238 was significantly lower compared to the patients with GNRI >104.238 (p = 0.010). Based on the results of the present study with a relatively large hospital-based cohort, the GNRI can be recommended for use as an independent prognostic marker for OS and PFS in patients with DLBCL.

Introduction: Pretransplant inflammatory and nutritional status has not been widely explored in terms of its impact on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) outcomes in lymphoma patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) on auto-HSCT outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 consecutive lymphoma patients who underwent their first auto-HSCT at the Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit at Akdeniz University Hospital. Results: The CAR had no impact on posttransplant outcomes. PNI ≤50 was an independent prognostic factor for both shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, p = 0.025) and worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.93, p = 0.021), respectively. The 5-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with PNI ≤50 than in patients with PNI >50 (37.3% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.003). The 5-year OS rate in patients with PNI ≤50 was significantly low when compared with patients who had PNI >50 as well (45.5% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.011). Patients with BMI <25 had higher 100-day transplant-related mortality compared with patients with BMI ≥25 (14.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.020). BMI <25 was an independent prognostic factor associated with shorter PFS and OS (HR = 2.98 [p = 0.003], HR = 5.06 [p < 0.001], respectively). The 5-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with BMI <25 than patients with BMI ≥25 (40.2% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.037). Similarly, the 5-year OS rate in patients with BMI <25 was significantly inferior compared to patients with BMI ≥25 (42.7% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Our study confirms that lower BMI and CAR have negative impacts on auto-HSCT outcomes in lymphoma patients. Furthermore, higher BMI should not be considered an obstacle for lymphoma patients who need auto-HSCT; conversely, it could be an advantage for posttransplant outcomes.

Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.

Background: Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients are at increased risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to intensive therapy and prolonged neutropenia. While pediatric guidelines support administering fluconazole or mold-active agents, the evidence in adults is limited. This study presents the first multicenter retrospective comparison of fluconazole and micafungin use in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 336 adult ALL patients from 11 centers in Türkiye (2010–2024) who received fluconazole (n = 230) or micafungin (n = 106) during induction chemotherapy. IFIs were classified according to the EORTC/MSG criteria. Results: The median age was 38.5 years, and 38.7% were female. Proven/probable IFIs occurred in 8.9% of patients, with similar rates between the fluconazole and micafungin groups (8.7% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.82). Multivariate analysis confirmed no significant association between the prophylactic antifungal type and IFI incidence, indicating comparable outcomes across groups. The median prophylaxis duration was longer with fluconazole, while the discontinuation rates, switch patterns, and subsequent antifungal use were comparable. The overall infection rates (~60%) and distribution of bacterial, viral, and polymicrobial infections were similar between the two groups. Prior bacterial infection increased the risk of IFI by 2.7-fold, and IFI-positive patients had longer neutropenia. At the end of induction, the remission, refractory, and mortality rates were similar between groups. The median overall survival was 24 months. Conclusions: Fluconazole and micafungin showed similar efficacy as the primary antifungal prophylaxis treatment in adult ALL patients. Given the limited evidence in adults and the ongoing need to optimize antifungal strategies, prospective randomized trials directly comparing these agents in this population are needed to confirm and expand upon our findings.