Background: In plants, 14-3-3 proteins, also called GENERAL REGULATORY FACTORs (GRFs), encoded by a large multigene family, are involved in protein–protein interactions and play crucial roles in various physiological processes. No genome-wide analysis of theGRFgene family has been performed in cotton, and their functions in flowering are largely unknown.Results: In this study, 17, 17, 31, and 17 GRFgenes were identified inGossypium herbaceum,G. arboreum,G. hirsutum, andG. raimondii, respectively, by genome-wide analyses and were designated asGheGRFs,GaGRFs,GhGRFs, andGrGRFs, respectively. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that these proteins were divided into ε and non-ε groups. Gene structural, motif composition, synteny, and duplicated gene analyses of the identifiedGRFgenes provided insights into the evolution of this family in cotton.GhGRFgenes exhibited diverse expression patterns in different tissues. Yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays showed that the GhGRFs interacted with the cotton FLOWERING LOCUS T homologue GhFT in the cytoplasm and nucleus, while they interacted with the basic leucine zipper transcription factor GhFD only in the nucleus. Virus-induced gene silencing inG. hirsutumand transgenic studies inArabidopsisdemonstrated thatGhGRF3/6/9/15repressed flowering and thatGhGRF14promoted flowering.Conclusions: Here, 82GRFgenes were identified in cotton, and their gene and protein features, classification, evolution, and expression patterns were comprehensively and systematically investigated. The GhGRF3/6/9/15 interacted with GhFT and GhFD to form florigen activation complexs that inhibited flowering. However, GhGRF14 interacted with GhFT and GhFD to form florigen activation complex that promoted flowering. The results provide a foundation for further studies on the regulatory mechanisms of flowering.

Background: Strigolactones (SLs) are a recently discovered class of plant hormones. SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1)-like proteins, key component of the SL signaling pathway, have been studied extensively for their roles in regulating plant growth and development, such as plant branching. However, systematic identification and functional characterization of SMXL genes in cotton (Gossypium sp.), an important fiber and oil crop, has rarely been conducted. Results: We identified 210 SMXL genes from 21 plant genomes and examined their evolutionary relationships. The structural characteristics of the SMXL genes and their encoded proteins exhibited both consistency and diversity. All plant SMXL proteins possess a conserved Clp-N domain, P-loop NTPase, and EAR motif. We identified 63 SMXL genes in cotton and classified these into four evolutionary branches. Gene expression analysis revealed tissue-specific expression patterns of GhSMXL genes, with some upregulated in response to GR24 treatment. Protein co-expression network analysis showed that GhSMXL6, GhSMXL7-1, and GhSMXL7-2 mainly interact with proteins functioning in growth and development, while virus-induced gene silencing revealed that GhSMAX1-1 and GhSMAX1-2 suppress the growth and development of axillary buds. Conclusions: SMXL gene family members show evolutionary diversification through the green plant lineage. GhSMXL6/7–1/7–2 genes play critical roles in the SL signaling pathway, while GhSMXL1-1 and GhSMXL1-2 function redundantly in growth of axillary buds. Characterization of the cotton SMXL gene family provides new insights into their roles in responding to SL signals and in plant growth and development. Genes identified in this study could be used as the candidate genes for improvement of plant architecture and crop yield.

MADS-box genes encode transcription factors critical for plant development, particularly floral organogenesis, flowering time regulation, and adaptation to environmental stresses. Among these, the MIKCC-type genes are pivotal regulators in floral developmental processes. Although the evolutionary diversification and functional dynamics of MADS-box genes have been extensively characterized in model plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, their evolutionary relationships and functional profiles in Lavandula angustifolia, an economically significant aromatic plant, remain poorly understood. Genome-wide analysis identified 173 MADS-box genes in L. angustifolia, categorized into type I (Mα: 26; Mβ: 0; Mγ: 10) and type II (MIKCC: 125; MIKC*: 12) based on phylogenetic comparisons with A. thaliana. The MIKCC subgroup was further subdivided into 12 subclasses, including genes central to the ABCDE model of floral organ specification. Structural analyses revealed distinct conserved motifs and exon-intron configurations specific to each subgroup, indicative of functional divergence. Synteny analysis demonstrated Whole Genome Duplication (WGD) and segmental duplications as major contributors to MIKCC gene family expansion, notably among genes linked to floral organ development. Expression profiling via RNA-seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) showed type II MADS-box genes exhibited higher expression levels with pronounced tissue-specific and developmental stage-specific expression patterns compared to type I genes. Many type II genes displayed significant associations with floral organogenesis, floral transition, and abiotic stress responses, underscoring their essential roles in reproductive development and environmental adaptability in L. angustifolia. The identification and comprehensive characterization of 173 MADS-box genes in L. angustifolia highlight the significant expansion of the MIKCC subgroup driven primarily by WGD and segmental duplications. The distinct structural features and specific expression patterns observed provide insights into the functional divergence and complexity of these genes, particularly regarding floral organogenesis and adaptation to environmental stress. This study establishes a robust molecular basis for further functional analysis and genetic improvement of aromatic plants.

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhance plant growth through multiple mechanisms; however, the underlying plant molecular response pathways remain i