Jun Yuan

Dr. Jun Yuan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJinhua Hong
Jinhua Hong
ZHZhixin Hu
Zhixin Hu
MPMatt Probert
Matt Probert
KLKun Li
Kun Li
DLDanhui Lv
Danhui Lv
ZZZe Zhang
Ze Zhang
Defects usually play an important role in tailoring various properties of two-dimensional materials. Defects in two-dimensional monolayer molybdenum disulphide may be responsible for large variation of electric and optical properties. Here we present a comprehensive joint experiment–theory investigation of point defects in monolayer molybdenum disulphide prepared by mechanical exfoliation, physical and chemical vapour deposition. Defect species are systematically identified and their concentrations determined by aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy, and also studied by ab-initio calculation. Defect density up to 3.5 × 1013 cm−2 is found and the dominant category of defects changes from sulphur vacancy in mechanical exfoliation and chemical vapour deposition samples to molybdenum antisite in physical vapour deposition samples. Influence of defects on electronic structure and charge-carrier mobility are predicted by calculation and observed by electric transport measurement. In light of these results, the growth of ultra-high-quality monolayer molybdenum disulphide appears a primary task for the community pursuing high-performance electronic devices.

15 October 2000 in Physical Review B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAndrea Ferrari
Andrea Ferrari
Andrea Li BassiAndrea Li Bassi
Andrea Li Bassi
BTBrian Tanner
Brian Tanner
Vlad StolojanVlad Stolojan
Vlad Stolojan
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan
JRJ. Robertson
J. Robertson
Grazing-angle x-ray reflectivity (XRR) is described as an efficient, nondestructive, parameter-free means to measure the mass density of various types of amorphous carbon films down to the nanometer thickness range. It is shown how XRR can also detect layering if it is present in the films, in which case the reflectivity profile must be modeled to derive the density. The mass density can also be derived from the valence electron density via the plasmon energy, which is measured by electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS). We formally define an interband effective electron mass m*, which accounts for the finite band gap. Comparison of XRR and EELS densities allows us to fit an average m*=0.87m for carbon systems, m being the free-electron mass. We show that, within the Drude-Lorentz model of the optical spectrum, m*=[1−n(0)−2]m, where n(0) is the refractive index at zero optical frequency. The fraction of sp2 bonding is derived from the carbon K-edge EELS spectrum, and it is shown how a choice of “magic” incidence and collection angles in the scanning transmission electron microscope can give sp2 fraction values that are independent of sample orientation or anisotropy. We thus give a general relationship between mass density and sp3 content for carbon films.

9 December 2007 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZ. Y. Li
Z. Y. Li
NYN. P. Young
N. P. Young
Marcel Di VeceMarcel Di Vece
Marcel Di Vece
SPS. Palomba
S. Palomba
RPRichard E. Palmer
Richard E. Palmer
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan

16 August 2017 in Reviews of Modern Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLS. M. Lloyd
S. M. Lloyd
MBMohamed Babiker
Mohamed Babiker
GTG. Thirunavukkarasu
G. Thirunavukkarasu
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan
The recent prediction and subsequent creation of electron vortex beams in a number of laboratories occurred after almost 20 years had elapsed since the recognition of the physical significance and potential for applications of the orbital angular momentum carried by optical vortex beams. A rapid growth in interest in electron vortex beams followed, with swift theoretical and experimental developments. Much of the rapid progress can be attributed in part to the clear similarities between electron optics and photonics arising from the functional equivalence between the Helmholtz equations governing the free-space propagation of optical beams and the time-independent Schrödinger equation governing freely propagating electron vortex beams. There are, however, key differences in the properties of the two kinds of vortex beams. This review is primarily concerned with the electron type, with specific emphasis on the distinguishing vortex features: notably the spin, electric charge, current and magnetic moment, the spatial distribution, and the associated electric and magnetic fields. The physical consequences and potential applications of such properties are pointed out and analyzed, including nanoparticle manipulation and the mechanisms of orbital angular momentum transfer in the electron vortex interaction with matter.

24 September 2018 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPaul N. Duchesne
Paul N. Duchesne
ZLZ. Y. Li
Z. Y. Li
CDChristopher P. Deming
Christopher P. Deming
VFVictor Fung
Victor Fung
XZXiaojing Zhao
Xiaojing Zhao
PZPeng Zhang
Peng Zhang