We created a web-based tutorial designed to teach manual interpretation and identification of spectra acquired using electron transfer dissociation (ETD). The tutorial provides an explanation of the ETD fragmentation process with the goal of identifying all of the significant peaks in a spectrum. We discuss determination of the precursor mass and charge state, neutral losses, electron transfer without dissociation (ETnoD), and the mechanisms by which fragment ions are created. Our hope is to provide a tool that presents the information already taught in D.F.H.’s short courses in a way that is easy for any student or researcher in the mass spectrometry community to access. The tutorial may be found at http://www.huntlab.org .
Background: Electron Transfer Dissociation [ETD] can dissociate multiply charged precursor polypeptides, providing extensive peptide backbone cleavage. ETD spectra contain charge reduced precursor peaks, usually of high intensity, and whose pattern is dependent on its parent precursor charge. These charge reduced precursor peaks and associated neutral loss peaks should be removed before these spectra are searched for peptide identifications. ETD spectra can also contain ion-types other than c and z˙. Modifying search strategies to accommodate these ion-types may aid in increased peptide identifications. Additionally, if the precursor mass is measured using a lower resolution instrument such as a linear ion trap, the charge of the precursor is often not known, reducing sensitivity and increasing search times. We implemented algorithms to remove these precursor peaks, accommodate new ion-types in noise filtering routine in OMSSA and to estimate any unknown precursor charge, using Linear Discriminant Analysis [LDA]. Results: Spectral pre-processing to remove precursor peaks and their associated neutral losses prior to protein sequence library searches resulted in a 9.8% increase in peptide identifications at a 1% False Discovery Rate [FDR] compared to previous OMSSA filter. Modifications to the OMSSA noise filter to accommodate various ion-types resulted in a further 4.2% increase in peptide identifications at 1% FDR. Moreover, ETD spectra when searched with charge states obtained from the precursor charge determination algorithm is shown to be up to 3.5 times faster than the general range search method, with a minor 3.8% increase in sensitivity. Conclusion: Overall, there is an 18.8% increase in peptide identifications at 1% FDR by incorporating the new precursor filter, noise filter and by using the charge determination algorithm, when compared to previous versions of OMSSA.
6 November 2024 in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Donald Hunt has made seminal contributions to the fields of proteomics, immunology, epigenetics, and glycobiology. The foundation of every important work to come out of the Hunt Laboratory is de novo peptide sequencing. For decades, he taught hundreds of students, postdocs, engineers, and scientists to directly interpret mass spectral data. To honor his legacy and ensure that the art of de novo sequencing is not lost, we have adapted his teaching materials into "The Hunt Lab Guide to De Novo Peptide Sequence Analysis by Tandem Mass Spectrometry". In addition to the de novo sequencing tutorials, we present two freely available software tools that facilitate manual interpretation of mass spectra and validation of search results. The first, "Hunt Lab Peptide Fragment Calculator", calculates precursor and fragment mass-to-charge ratios for any peptide. The second program, "Predator Protein Fragment Calculator", was inspired in part by the fragment calculator developed in the Hunt Lab. Its capabilities are enhanced to facilitate interpretation of mass spectral data derived from intact proteins. We hope that the combination of these educational tools will continue to benefit students and researchers by empowering them to interpret data on their own.
Mass spectrometry-based analysis of post-translational modifications (PTMs) is a key strategy for characterizing protein regulation and identifying disease-associated targets, with endogenous PTMs serving as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and therapeutic response. More recently, chemical proteomic strategies have adapted PTM-focused workflows to measure engagement of covalent and photoactivatable small-molecule probes, expanding the scope of ligand discovery for these disease-associated targets. This review provides an overview of mass spectrometry-based PTM analysis workflows, including LC–MS/MS acquisition and post-acquisition data processing, with an emphasis on how modification-specific physicochemical properties influence PTM detection and identification. Common analytical challenges that limit PTM identification, including variable MS/MS fragmentation behavior and modification site localization, are discussed using modifications such as phosphorylation and photoaffinity labeling probe adducts as representative examples. Recent advances in acquisition strategies and computational tools that improve spectral quality and confidence in PTM assignment are also summarized. Additionally, approaches for the analytical validation of modification events, such as metabolic labeling strategies, are described. Together, this review outlines key considerations, capabilities, and limitations of MS-based PTM profiling and provides a framework for interpreting PTM datasets to support their effective integration into downstream biochemical and disease target validation studies.
Aging results in a progressive decline in physiological function due to the deterioration of essential biological processes, such as transcription and RNA splicing, ultimately increasing mortality risk. Although proteomics is emerging as a powerful tool for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of aging, existing studies are constrained by limited proteome coverage and only observe a narrow range of lifespan. To overcome these limitations, we integrated the Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer with the multiplex tandem mass tag (TMT) technology to profile the proteomes of three brain tissues (cortex, hippocampus, striatum) and kidney in the C57BL/6JN mouse model, achieving quantification of 8,954 to 9,376 proteins per tissue (cumulatively 12,749 across all tissues). Our sample population represents balanced sampling across both sexes and three age groups (3, 12, and 20 months), comprising young adulthood to early late life (approximately 20-60 years of age for human lifespan). To enhance quantitative accuracy, we developed a peptide filtering strategy based on resolution and signal-to-noise thresholds. Our analysis uncovered distinct tissue-specific patterns of protein abundance, with age and sex differences in the kidney, while brain tissues exhibit notable age changes and limited sex differences. In addition, we identified both proteomic changes that are linear with age (i.e., continuous) and that have a non-linear pattern (i.e., non-continuous), revealing complex protein dynamics over the adult lifespan. Integrating our findings with early developmental proteomic data from brain tissues highlighted further divergent age-related trajectories, particularly in synaptic proteins. This study not only provides a robust data analysis workflow for TMT datasets generated using the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer but also expands the proteomic landscape of aging, capturing proteins with age and sex effects with unprecedented depth.