Accumulating clinical evidence has suggested serum triglyceride (TG) is a leading predictor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, comparable to low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (C) in populations with type 2 diabetes, which exceeds the predictive power of hemoglobinA1c. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in diabetes consists of elevated serum concentrations of TG-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), a high prevalence of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and low concentrations of cholesterol-rich high-density lipoprotein (HDL)2-C. A central lipoprotein abnormality is an increase in large TG-rich very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)1, and other lipoprotein abnormalities are metabolically linked to increased TRLs. Insulin critically regulates serum VLDL concentrations by suppressing hepatic VLDL production and stimulating VLDL removal by activation of lipoprotein lipase. It is still debated whether hyperinsulinemia compensatory for insulin resistance is causally associated with the overproduction of VLDL. This review introduces experimental and clinical observations revealing that insulin resistance, but not hyperinsulinemia stimulates hepatic VLDL production. LDL and HDL consist of heterogeneous particles with different size and density. Cholesterol-depleted small dense LDL and cholesterol-rich HDL2 subspecies are particularly affected by insulin resistance and can be named “Metabolic LDL and HDL,” respectively. We established the direct assays for quantifying small dense LDL-C and small dense HDL(HDL3)-C, respectively. Subtracting HDL3-C from HDL-C gives HDL2-C. I will explain clinical relevance of measurements of LDL and HDL subspecies determined by our assays. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) substantially worsens plasma lipid profile thereby potentiated atherogenic risk. Finally, I briefly overview pathophysiology of dyslipidemia associated with DKD, which has not been so much taken up by other review articles.

Aims/hypothesis Several lines of evidence suggest that incretin-based therapies suppress the development of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. We investigated the possibility that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) can prevent the development of atherosclerosis in Apoe ^−/− mice. Methods Apoe ^−/− mice (17 weeks old) were administered GLP-1(7–36)amide, GLP-1(9–36)amide, GIP(1–42) or GIP(3–42) for 4 weeks. Aortic atherosclerosis, oxidised LDL-induced foam cell formation and related gene expression in exudate peritoneal macrophages were determined. Results Administration of GLP-1(7–36)amide or GIP(1–42) significantly suppressed atherosclerotic lesions and macrophage infiltration in the aortic wall, compared with vehicle controls. These effects were cancelled by co-infusion with specific antagonists for GLP-1 and GIP receptors, namely exendin(9–39) or Pro³(GIP). The anti-atherosclerotic effects of GLP-1(7–36)amide and GIP(1–42) were associated with significant decreases in foam cell formation and downregulation of CD36 and acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) in macrophages. GLP-1 and GIP receptors were both detected in Apoe ^−/− mouse macrophages. Ex vivo incubation of macrophages with GLP-1(7–36)amide or GIP(1–42) for 48 h significantly suppressed foam cell formation. This effect was wholly abolished in macrophages pretreated with exendin(9−39) or (Pro³)GIP, or with an adenylate cyclase inhibitor, MDL12,330A, and was mimicked by incubation with an adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin. The inactive forms, GLP-1(9–36)amide and GIP(3–42), had no effects on atherosclerosis and macrophage foam cell formation. Conclusions/interpretation Our study is the first to demonstrate that active forms of GLP-1 and GIP exert anti-atherogenic effects by suppressing macrophage foam cell formation via their own receptors, followed by cAMP activation. Molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are associated with the downregulation of CD36 and ACAT-1 by incretins.

BACKGROUND: Plasma concentrations of small dense (sd)-LDL are associated with the prevalence of cardiovascular events. However, the special equipment and long assay times required for sd-LDL measurement have hindered its clinical application. Herein, we report development of a simple homogeneous assay for sd-LDL-cholesterol (C) adaptable to autoanalyzers.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified suitable surfactants and phospholipases by screening for those selective for the sd-LDL fraction (d 1.044–1.063 kg/L) and for the dissociation of other lipoproteins, including large buoyant LDL (lb-LDL). Principal characteristics of this assay were compared with ultracentrifugal isolation of LDL subfractions and with our previous heparin-magnesium precipitation assay for sd-LDL. We measured sd-LDL-C concentrations in 460 healthy, normolipidemic individuals.RESULTS: We used a polyoxyethylene benzylphenyl ether derivative to dissociate triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and HDLs, whereas sphingomyelinase proved most effective for dissociation of lb-LDL from LDL owing to the higher sphingomyelin content in the lb-LDL subfractions. A polyoxyethylene styrenephenyl ether derivative protected sd-LDL against the dissociative actions of sphingomyelinase and cholesterol oxidase/esterase during an initial incubation step. Next, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether dissociated sd-LDL-C and the cholesterol released from sd-LDL were subsequently measured by using cholesterol oxidase/esterase. The homogeneous method correlated excellently with ultracentrifugation for sd-LDL-C (y = 0.99x – 0.09, R2 = 0.91, n = 60) and exhibited within-run precision CVs <1.1%. The distribution of sd-LDL-C was skewed, and the central 95% of sd-LDL-C concentrations ranged from 0.24 to 0.88 mmol/L (9.4–34.0 mg/dL).CONCLUSIONS: The homogeneous assay allows reproducible measurement of sd-LDL-C within 10 min and appears promising in further investigations of the clinical significance of sd-LDL-C.

A preponderance of small, dense (sd) LDL is strongly associated with the development of coronary heart disease, but the method for the measurement of sd LDL is too laborious for clinical use. We report a simple method for the quantification of sd LDL that is applicable to an autoanalyzer. This method consists of two steps: first, to precipitate the lipoprotein of density (d) <1.044 g/ml using heparin-magnesium; and second, to measure LDL-cholesterol in the supernatant by the homogenous method or apolipoprotein B (apoB) by an immunoturbidometric assay. The cholesterol and apoB values obtained by the precipitation method (45 ± 26 and 33 ± 20 mg/dl, respectively) were similar to those obtained in the lipoprotein (d = 1.044–1.063) separated by ultracentrifugation (42 ± 22 and 31 ± 17 mg/dl, respectively), and there was an excellent correlation between the two methods for sd LDL-cholesterol (y = 1.05X + 1, r = 0.88, n = 69) and apoB (y = 1.07X, r = 0.90). Sd LDL values had a significant inverse correlation with LDL size. A high correlation was found between sd LDL-cholesterol and apoB values (r = 0.94). Sd LDL value was related to triglyceride, apoB, and LDL-cholesterol, but not to the buoyant LDL level.

Background: The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been reported to increase both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (C). This study aimed to determine how SGLT-2 inhibitors affect LDL and HDL-C subspecies. Methods: This single center, open-label, randomized, prospective study included 80 patients with type 2 diabetes taking prescribed oral hypoglycemic agents. Patients were allocated to receive dapagliflozin (n = 40) or sitagliptin (n = 40) as add-on treatment. Fasting blood samples were collected before and 12 weeks after this intervention. Small dense (sd) LDL-C, large buoyant (lb) LDL-C, HDL2-C, and HDL3-C levels were determined using our established homogeneous assays. Statistical comparison of blood parameters before and after treatment was performed using the paired t test. Results: Dapagliflozin and sitagliptin comparably decreased HbA1c (0.75 and 0.63%, respectively). Dapagliflozin significantly decreased body weight, systolic blood pressure, plasma triglycerides and liver transaminases, and increased adiponectin; sitagliptin did not alter these measurements. LDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) B were not significantly changed by dapagliflozin, whereas HDL-C and apo AI were increased. Dapagliflozin did not alter concentrations of LDL-C, but sd LDL-C decreased by 20% and lb LDL-C increased by 18%. Marked elevation in lb LDL-C (53%) was observed in individuals (n = 20) whose LDL-C was elevated by dapagliflozin. However, sd LDL-C remained suppressed (20%). Dapagliflozin increased HDL2-C by 18% without affecting HDL3-C. Sitagliptin did not alter plasma lipids or lipoprotein subspecies. Conclusions: A SGLT-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin suppresses potent atherogenic sd LDL-C and increased HDL2-C, a favorable cardiometabolic marker. Although LDL-C levels are elevated by treatment with dapagliflozin, this was due to increased concentrations of the less atherogenic lb LDL-C. However, these findings were not observed after treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000020984)

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are heterogenous with respect to their size, density and lipid composition. Among LDL particles, the smaller and denser LDL particles [small dense (sd) LDL] are more atherogenic and the sd LDL phenotype is strongly associated with development of coronary heart disease. Here we will review various methods for measurement of sd LDL. Although ultracentrifugation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and gradient-gel electrophoresis (GGE) are usually employed for the measurement of sd LDL, such methods are either too laborious or expensive for general clinical use. We recently established a simple precipitation method for the quantification of sd LDL. This method is applicable to routine clinical use and allows the rapid measurement of a large number of samples.