Background: Diabetes mellitus and cancer are commonly coexisting illnesses, and the global incidence and prevalence of both are rising. Cancer patients with diabetes face unique challenges. This review highlights the relationship between diabetes and cancer and various aspects of the management of diabetes in cancer patients. Methods: A literature search using keywords in PubMed was performed. Studies that were published in English prior to July 2021 were assessed and an overview of epidemiology, cancer risk, outcomes, treatment-related hyperglycemia and management of diabetes in cancer patients is provided. Results: Overall, 8–18% of cancer patients have diabetes as a comorbid medical condition. Diabetes is a risk factor for certain solid malignancies, such as pancreatic, liver, colon, breast, and endometrial cancer. Several novel targeted compounds and immunotherapies can cause hyperglycemia. Nevertheless, most patients undergoing cancer therapy can be managed with an appropriate glucose lowering agent without the need for discontinuation of cancer treatment. Evidence suggests that cancer patients with diabetes have higher cancer-related mortality; therefore, a multidisciplinary approach is important in the management of patients with diabetes and cancer for a better outcome. Conclusions: Future studies are required to better understand the underlying mechanism between the risk of cancer and diabetes. Furthermore, high-quality prospective studies evaluating management of diabetes in cancer patients using innovative tools are needed. A patient-centered approach is important in cancer patients with diabetes to avoid adverse outcomes.

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) are life-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus. However, limited data about DKA and HHS are available in patients with cancer. The current study aimed to determine characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who were admitted with DKA/HHS in a mid-size Canadian city. Consecutive adult patients with an active cancer who were admitted with DKA or HHS from January 2008 to December 2020 in the city of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada were retrospectively evaluated. A univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation of various clinical variables with hospital mortality. During the study period 6,555 patients with diabetes and cancer were admitted in one of the three tertiary care hospitals. Among them 33 (0.5 %) eligible patients with DKA or HHS with a median age of 60 years (range 36–94 years) were identified. In 36 % of patients, DKA or HHS was the presenting manifestation of newly diagnosed diabetes. Of all patients, 66 % developed DKA and 73 % had an advanced cancer. Overall, 52 % patients received a systemic cancer therapy prior to the admission, and 41 % received steroids. Ten (42 %) of 24 patients with an advanced cancer died, compared to none of the nine patients with an early-stage cancer (p = 0.032). No clinical factors significantly correlated with hospital mortality. Although DKA or HHS is uncommon in patients with diabetes and cancer, it is the manifestation of undiagnosed diabetes in about one-third of patients with cancer. It has been associated with high hospital mortality in patients with advanced cancer.

As bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) gain traction in the oncology treatment landscape, cancer centres must develop robust clinical pathways to ensure their safe and efficient delivery. Given the limited experience of the Canadian medical oncology community with TCEs, collecting and publishing early clinical experiences with these novel agents will be essential to inform best practices and support their safe and effective adoption across the broader Canadian oncology community. The approval of tarlatamab, the first-in-class delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3)-targeted TCE for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), underscores the importance of sharing early clinical experience with this agent, particularly given its unique safety profile, specific monitoring requirements, and use in a population that often has multiple comorbidities. Like other TCEs, tarlatamab is associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), adverse events (AEs) that necessitate the development of dedicated protocols by medical oncologists and multidisciplinary inpatient and outpatient clinical teams to ensure prompt recognition and management of these associated toxicities. By sharing insights into administration protocols, dose ramp-up procedures, post-cycle 1 monitoring, and AE management strategies implemented at their centres, early adopters of tarlatamab can help other institutions develop and refine their own protocols more efficiently. Lessons learned during the early implementation phase, including the roles of various healthcare providers and the transition from inpatient to outpatient care, should facilitate the smoother integration of tarlatamab and other TCEs for solid tumours into clinical pathways across Canada.