Xue-en Liu

Dr. Xue-en Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2015 in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLY. Li
Y. Li
YHY.-S. Huang
Y.-S. Huang
ZWZ.-Z. Wang
Z.-Z. Wang
ZYZ.-R. Yang
Z.-R. Yang
FSF. Sun
F. Sun
HZHui Zhuang
Hui Zhuang
Background Transient elastography is a non‐invasive method for staging liver fibrosis. The meta‐analysis using the hierarchical models to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B was rarely reported. Aim A meta‐analysis using the hierarchical models was performed to assess transient elastography for diagnosing and stage liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods Electronic databases were searched and studies were identified to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography in CHB patients for staging fibrosis F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3 and F = 4 with liver biopsy as a reference standard. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve and the bivariate models were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography, and meta‐regression analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity. The quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Results Twenty‐seven studies with a total of 4386 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. The summary sensitivity of transient elastography for staging fibrosis F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3 and F = 4 was 0.806 (95% CI, 0.756–0.847), 0.819 (95% CI, 0.748–0.874) and 0.863 (95% CI, 0.818–0.898), respectively, and the summary specificity was 0.824 (95% CI, 0.761–0.873), 0.866 (95% CI, 0.824–0.899) and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.840–0.903), respectively. The corresponding area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.91), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95), respectively. Meta‐regression showed that patient age contributed to heterogeneity. Conclusions Transient elastography performs well to diagnose liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, which may reduce the use of liver biopsy.

29 October 2007 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXue-en Liu
Xue-en Liu
LDLiesbeth Desmyter
Liesbeth Desmyter
CGChun-Fang Gao
Chun-Fang Gao
WLWouter Laroy
Wouter Laroy
SDSylviane Dewaele
Sylviane Dewaele
CCCuiying Chen
Cuiying Chen
We evaluated the use of blood serum N-glycan fingerprinting as a tool for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis induced by hepatitis B virus (HBV). A group of 450 HBV-infected patients with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis with or without HCC were studied. HCC was diagnosed by α-fetoprotein (AFP) analysis, ultrasonography, and/or computed tomography and was studied histologically. N-glycan profiles of serum proteins were determined with DNA sequencer–based carbohydrate analytical profiling technology. In this study, we found that a branch alpha(1,3)-fucosylated triantennary glycan was more abundant in patients with HCC than in patients with cirrhosis, patients with fibrosis, and healthy blood donors, whereas a bisecting core alpha(1,6)-fucosylated biantennary glycan was elevated in patients with cirrhosis. The concentration of these 2 glycans and the log ratio of peak 9 to peak 7 (renamed the GlycoHCCTest) were associated with the tumor stage. Moreover, for screening patients with HCC from patients with cirrhosis, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the GlycoHCCTest were very similar to those of AFP. Conclusion: This study indicates that a branch alpha(1,3)-fucosylated glycan is associated with the development of HCC. The serum N-glycan profile is a promising noninvasive method for detecting HCC in patients with cirrhosis and could be a valuable supplement to AFP in the diagnosis of HCC in HBV-infected patients with liver cirrhosis. Its use for the screening, follow-up, and management of patients with cirrhosis and HCC should be evaluated further.

1 October 2017 in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YGYuhua Gao
Yuhua Gao
YLYutang Li
Yutang Li
QMQinghua Meng
Qinghua Meng
Zhanqing ZhangZhanqing Zhang
Zhanqing Zhang
PZPing Zhao
Ping Zhao
HZHui Zhuang
Hui Zhuang
The study was designed to investigate whether serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA is a strong surrogate marker for intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) compared with serum HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic cccDNA were quantitatively detected at baseline ( n = 82) and 96 weeks ( n = 62) after treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. The correlations among serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic cccDNA levels were then statistically analyzed. The results showed that pretreatment intrahepatic cccDNA levels correlated better with serum HBV DNA levels ( r = 0.36, P < 0.01) than with serum HBV RNA levels ( r = 0.25, P = 0.02), whereas no correlations were found between pretreatment intrahepatic cccDNA levels and HBsAg ( r = 0.15, P = 0.17) or HBeAg ( r = 0.07, P = 0.56) levels. At 96 weeks after NUC treatment, intrahepatic cccDNA levels correlated well with HBsAg levels ( r = 0.39, P < 0.01) but not with serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBeAg levels (all P > 0.05). Besides, the decline in the intrahepatic cccDNA level from baseline to week 96 correlated better with the reduction in the serum HBsAg levels than with the decreases in the levels of the other markers (for the HBsAg decline, r = 0.38, P < 0.01; for the HBV DNA decline, r = 0.35, P = 0.01; for the HBV RNA decline, r = 0.28, P < 0.05; for the HBeAg decline, r = 0.18, P = 0.19). In conclusion, the baseline serum HBV RNA level or its decline after 96 weeks of NUC therapy correlated with the corresponding intrahepatic cccDNA level, while it was less than that seen with serum HBV DNA at baseline and HBsAg (or its decline) at 96 weeks after treatment, respectively.

1 December 2007 in Rejuvenation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VVValerie Vanhooren
Valerie Vanhooren
LDLiesbeth Desmyter
Liesbeth Desmyter
XLXue-en Liu
Xue-en Liu
MCMaurizio Cardelli
Maurizio Cardelli
CFClaudio Franceschi
Claudio Franceschi
CCCuiying Chen
Cuiying Chen
N-glycan profiling of the human serum glycoproteins including immunoglobulin fraction on different age groups of healthy persons shows substantial changes with increasing age in three major N-glycan structures. In individuals more than 40–50 years of age, there is an increase in under-galactosylated glycans and a decrease in the core α -1,6-fucosylated bi-galactosylated biantennary structure. These three glycan structures are also substantially changed in a Werner syndrome patient, to a level comparable or even more pronounced than those observed in a healthy Italian centenarian population. These data show that the glycosylation machineries in both liver cells and B-cells are affected in a similar way by the aging process despite their highly different nature. The observed changes in the glycan structures are indicative that biosynthetic processes are at the basis of the changes, possibly together with changes in serum clearing of glycan-altered proteins. Our data suggest that measurement of the N-glycan level changes could provide a noninvasive surrogate marker for general health or for age-related disease progression, and for monitoring the improvement of health after therapy.

1 February 2017 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KXKuan-Hui Xiang
Kuan-Hui Xiang
EMEleftherios Michailidis
Eleftherios Michailidis
HDHai Ding
Hai Ding
YPYa-Qin Peng
Ya-Qin Peng
MSMing-Ze Su
Ming-Ze Su
TLTong Li
Tong Li

1 December 2005 in Journal of Virological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYong-Hua Li
Yong-Hua Li
JLJie Li
Jie Li
XLXue-en Liu
Xue-en Liu
LWLing Wang
Ling Wang
TLTong Li
Tong Li
HZHui Zhuang
Hui Zhuang