In recent years, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a respiratory support system that has become prominent in the treatment of respiratory failure. HFNC provides higher concentration and flow of oxygen, resulting in decreasing anatomic dead space by preventing rebreathing and ensure positive end-expiratory. However, in COVID-19, the usage of HFNC is much controversial due to concerns about the benefits and risk of aerosol-dispersion. Considering the debates about the use of HFNC, we reviewed the literature related to the usage of HFNC in COVID-19. The available reports suggest that HFNC provides high concentrations of oxygen to the patients, who can not reach with conventional devices. HFNC can reduce the requiring of intubation in patients with COVID-19, and it can decrease the length of intensive care unit stay, and complications related to mechanical ventilation. Also HFNC can in achieving apneic oxygenation in patients during airway management. Besides that, the use of high-flow oxygen cannulas can produce aerosols. So, HFNC treatment should be carried out in a negative pressure room; when it is not possible, devices should be undertaken in a single room.

Prone positioning is a well-known supportive maneuver to improve oxygenation for patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although this technique is usually performed to sedated patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, it has been used in non-intubated patients frequently during the coronavirus diseases-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Favorable outcomes have been reported mainly in combining the prone positioning with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Due to limited data, a standard approach for the awake prone positioning has not yet been defined. In this manuscript, we reviewed the literature data about prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19. According to available literature data, we concluded that prone positioning in non-intubated COVID-19 patients may improve oxygenation and prevent the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. But the efficacy is still controversial in the early stage of the disease due to pulmonary mechanics. Further studies are needed to the defined optimal approach of awake prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Lung cancer is the most common solid organ malignancy requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. For many years, lung cancer patients were not considered in the priority patient category for admission to ICU because of their high mortality rate and poor response to therapy. Considering the developments in treatment modalities, we aimed to reevaluate the prognosis of patients with lung cancer in the ICU. Patients characteristics, date of diagnosis, the reason for ICU admission, the stage of cancer, histopathological type, history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery for cancer, and APACHE-II and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were recorded retrospectively. A total of 100 patients had a mean age of 69.7 ± 9.0 years. Among these patients, 18% had small cell lung cancer, while 82% had non-small cell lung cancer. The in-hospital mortality rate was 69% for all patients, while among those discharged from the ICU, the first 6-month mortality rate was 58.1%. The median survival time was 8.2 months. Advanced age, the need for mechanical ventilation, the need for vasopressors, a high APACHE -II, and the CCI all reduced survival in multivariate analysis, whereas chemotherapy and surgical history improved survival. Patients admitted to the ICU with lung cancer continue to experience a high mortality rate. However, identifying the factors that are associated with survival can be crucial in establishing care plans and prioritizing ICU admission for further therapy.

Introduction: Although thorax ultrasound has been used to diagnose pneumonia in recent years, the role of ultrasonic diaphragm evaluation in the prognosis of pneumonia is unknown. This study aimed to assess the impact of diaphragmatic excursion (Dex) measured by ultrasound on the prognosis of severe pneumonia in critical care patients. Materials and Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2019 and July 2021. Patients' Dex values, vital signs, clinical features, laboratory parameters, APACHE-II scores on the first admission day of ICU, mortality and respiratory support status at follow-up were recorded. Results: There were 39 patients enrolled in the study. Mean Dex of the study patients was 30.66 +/- 12.17 mm. Mean Dex was significantly lower in deceased patients than survivors (18.37 +/- 8.12 vs 34.90 +/- 10.36 p< 0.001). Dex was lower in patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation than those not (24.90 +/- 10.93 vs 34.26 +/- 11.70, p= 0.017). The cut-off value of Dex was found 19.0 mm for significantly predicted (p <= 0.001) survival with the sensitivity of 96.6% and specificity of 70%. Among the study group, diaphragm excursion was negatively correlated with APACHE-II score (r=-0.688, p <= 0.001) and respiratory rate (r=-0.531, p= 0.001). Conclusion: Dex measured on the day of ICU admission can be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia.

Background: Guidelines recommend performing biomarker tests for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), BRAF and ROS proto-oncogene-1(ROS1) genes and protein expression of programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1) in patients with non-small lung cell carcinoma (NSCLC). Studies reported that endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can provide sufficient material for cancer biomarker analyses, but there are still concerns about the subject. Aim: The purpose of the study was to assess the adequacy of EBUS-TBNA for testing lung cancer biomarkers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with NSCLC whose EBUS-TBNA was analysed for EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, BRAF and PD-L1 expression between December 2011 and December 2020. Results: A total of 394 patients were enrolled in the study. EGFR mutation and ALK fusion were the most common studied biomarkers. EBUS-TBNA adequacy rate for biomarker tests was found 99.0% for EGFR, 99.1 for ALK, 97.2% for ROS1, 100% for BRAF and 99.3% for PD-L1 testing. Multivariate analysis revealed the histological type, history of treatment for NSCL, size, or 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of sampled lesion did not show any association with TBNA adequacy for biomarker testing. Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA can provide adequate material for biomarker testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, BRAF and PD-L1 expression.