Objectives: 68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography (PET) imaging targets CXCR4 expression which is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for imaging CXCR4 expression in MM and compared results with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT. Methods: 34 (21M; 13F; median age = 57.5 years) treatment naive multiple myeloma patients were recruited. All the patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging. Freshly prepared 68Ga-Pentixafor (148–185 MBq) was injected intravenously and whole-body PET/CT (low-dose CT) was acquired at 1 h post-injection. The pattern of uptake (diffuse, focal or mixed) and the mean SUVmax value of all the lesions (when lesions were ≤5) or of the five most tracer avid lesions (when lesions was >5) were evaluated. Tumor to background ratio (TBRmax) was calculated for both the tracers. Durie Salmon plus staging (DSPS) was used for disease staging on PET and the results were compared with International staging system (ISS) Results: 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT showed higher disease extent than seen on 18F-FDG PET/CT in 23/34 patients (68.0%), lesser disease extent in 2/34 (6%) and similar disease extent in 9/34 (26%) patients. Significantly (p < 0.001) higher TBRmax values (5.7; IQR 8.8) were observed on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT as compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT values (2.9; IQR = 4.0). Both the techniques detected extramedullary lesions in six patients. On the other hand, 68Ga-Pentixafor detected medullary lesions in five, whereas, 18F-FDG PET in three patients. Further, only 68Ga-Pentixafor TBRmax correlated significantly (ρ = 0.421; 0.013) with bone marrow plasma cell percentage. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET upstaged more number (9/29) of patients as compared to (4/29) 18F-FDG PET imaging. On the other hand, 18F-FDG PET down-staged 9/29, whereas 68Ga-Pentixafor PET downstaged only 3/29 patients. Conclusion: 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT evaluated the whole-body disease burden of CXCR4 receptors non-invasively which is not possible by tissue sampling methods. This novel PET tracer has also implication for disease staging. Dual 68Ga-Pentixafor/18F-FDG PET/CT imaging may help in determining the tumor heterogeneity in MM. Advances in knowledge: This CXCR4 targeting PET tracer has a promising role in the development of CXCR4 targeting theranostics and also for response assessment to these therapies including the conventional treatment.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic disorder characterized by clonal proliferation of neoplastic Langerhans cells (LCs). LC proliferation can also be seen in different reactive dermatosis. CyclinD1 is a downstream marker of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway, which is often activated in LCH. This study aimed to evaluate the role of cyclinD1 to differentiate reactive LC proliferation from LCH. All cases of cutaneous LCH diagnosed by biopsy in the past 3 years (n = 13) were immunostained with CD1a, p53, CD31, and cyclinD1. Seven cases each of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and lichen planus (LP) were taken as control. Presence of p53, CD31, and cyclinD1-positive LCs (CD1a-positive) were compared in the dermis. In all LCH cases, dermal neoplastic LCs showed diffuse CD1a positivity and 12 cases (92.3%) showed variable (30%–70%) cyclinD1 expression. Weak p53 and CD31 expression were seen in 61.5% and 46.1% of LCH cases, respectively. In the control group, 5 cases of LP and 4 cases of DLE showed variable LC proliferation, highlighted by CD1a positivity. However, no case of reactive dermatosis showed cyclinD1 or p53 expression by the reactive LCs. Weak and patchy CD31 expression by the reactive LCs were found in 1 (25%) and 2 (40%) cases of DLE and LP, respectively. To conclude, cyclinD1 is frequently expressed in neoplastic LCs in LCH. It is an efficient marker to differentiate neoplastic from reactive LC proliferation, and can be used as a surrogate marker in LCH.

According to the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors (2016), histological diagnosis of gliomas should be supplemented by molecular information. This study was carried out to determine the frequency of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), ATRX, and BRAF V600E mutations in different grade astrocytomas and their prognostic value. Eighty cases of astrocytoma (15 pilocytic astrocytoma, 25 diffuse astrocytoma, 15 anaplastic astrocytoma, and 25 glioblastoma) with follow-up information were analyzed using immunohistochemistry for IDH1 mutant protein, ATRX, p53, and BRAF. Sanger sequencing was carried out for IDH1 exon 4 and BRAF exon 15. All pilocytic astrocytoma and primary glioblastoma cases were negative for IDH1 mutation. IDH1 mutation was detected in 80% (20/25) DA and 87% (13/15) AA cases. IDH1 R132H was the commonest IDH1 mutation (94.1%) and immunohistochemistry showed 100% sensitivity and specificity to detect this mutation. Loss of nuclear ATRX expression was found in 87% (20/23) and 100% (14/14) DA and AA cases, respectively. IDH1 mutant DA patients had longer overall survival than IDH1 wild cases, although this difference was not significant (79.5 months vs. 42.5 months, P value 0.417). BRAF V600E mutation was not detected in any astrocytic tumor. IDH1 and ATRX mutations are very common in diffuse astrocytoma and anaplastic astrocytoma, while they are rare in pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Immunohistochemistry for IDH1 and ATRX can successfully characterize the diffuse gliomas into molecularly defined groups in majority of the cases. BRAF V600E mutation is rare in astrocytic tumors in Indian population.