Weitian Chen

Dr. Weitian Chen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 January 2016 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JTJonathan Tamir
Jonathan Tamir
MUMartin Uecker
Martin Uecker
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen
PLPeng Lai
Peng Lai
MAMarcus T. Alley
Marcus T. Alley
MLMichael Lustig
Michael Lustig

27 October 2010 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKK. M. Koch
K. M. Koch
ABA. C. Brau
A. C. Brau
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen
GGG. E. Gold
G. E. Gold
BHB. A. Hargreaves
B. A. Hargreaves
KKK. F. King
K. F. King
The recently developed multi‐acquisition with variable resonance image combination (MAVRIC) and slice‐encoding metal artifact correction (SEMAC) techniques can significantly reduce image artifacts commonly encountered near embedded metal hardware. These artifact reductions are enabled by applying alternative spectral and spatial‐encoding schemes to conventional spin‐echo imaging techniques. Here, the MAVRIC and SEMAC concepts are connected and discussed. The development of a hybrid technique that utilizes strengths of both methods is then introduced. The presented technique is shown capable of producing minimal artifact, high‐resolution images near total joint replacements in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med, 2010.

29 September 2010 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKK.M. Koch
K.M. Koch
BHB.A. Hargreaves
B.A. Hargreaves
KPK. Butts Pauly
K. Butts Pauly
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen
GGG.E. Gold
G.E. Gold
KKK.F. King
K.F. King

1 February 2017 in Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYáo T. Li
Yáo T. Li
JCJean-Pierre Cercueil
Jean-Pierre Cercueil
JYJing Yuan
Jing Yuan
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen
RLRomaric Loffroy
Romaric Loffroy
Yi-Xiang WangYi-Xiang Wang
Yi-Xiang Wang
A comprehensive literature review was performed on liver intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique and its applications. Heterogeneous data have been reported. IVIM parameters are magnetic field strength dependent to a mild extent. A lower Dslow (D) value at 3 T than at 1.5 T and higher perfusion fraction (PF) value at 3 T than at 1.5 T were noted. An increased number of b values are associated with increased IVIM parameter measurement accuracy. With the current status of art, IVIM technique is not yet capable of detecting early stage liver fibrosis and diagnosing liver fibrosis grades, nor can it differentiate liver tumors. Though IVIM parameters show promise for tumor treatment monitoring, till now how PF and Dfast (D*) add diagnostic value to Dslow or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) remains unclear. This paper shows the state-of-art IVIM MR technique is still not able to offer reliable measurement for liver. More works on the measurement robustness are warranted as they are essential to justify follow-up clinical studies on patients.

29 July 2013 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXiaojuan Li
Xiaojuan Li
CWCory Wyatt
Cory Wyatt
JRJulien Rivoire
Julien Rivoire
EHEric Han
Eric Han
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen
SMSharmila Majumdar
Sharmila Majumdar
Purpose To develop a robust sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantifications and to examine the in vivo repeatability and diurnal variation of T1ρ and T2 quantifications in knee cartilage. Materials and Methods Six healthy volunteers were scanned in the morning and afternoon on 2 days using a combined T1ρ and T2 quantification sequence developed in this study. Repeatability of T1ρ and T2 quantification was estimated using root‐mean‐square coefficients‐of‐variation (RMS‐CV). T1ρ and T2 values from morning scans were compared to those from afternoon scans using paired t‐tests. Results The overall RMS‐CV of in vivo T1ρ and T2 quantification was 5.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The RMS‐CV of am scans was 4.2% and 5.0% while the RMS‐CV of pm scans was 6.0% and 6.3% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. No significant difference was found between T1ρ or T2 values in the morning and in the afternoon. Conclusion A sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantification with scan time less than 10 minutes and is robust to B0 and B1 inhomogeneity was developed with excellent repeatability. For a cohort with low‐level daily activity, although no significant diurnal variation of cartilage MR relaxation times was observed, the afternoon scans had inferior repeatability compared to morning scans. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1287–1293 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc .

18 March 2022 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jin HongJin Hong
Jin Hong
SYSimon Chun-Ho Yu
Simon Chun-Ho Yu
WCWeitian Chen
Weitian Chen