Nicole Beebe

Dr. Nicole Beebe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2005 in Digital Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicole Beebe
Nicole Beebe
JCJan Guynes Clark
Jan Guynes Clark


24 July 2013 in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicole Beebe
Nicole Beebe
LMLaurence A. Maddox
Laurence A. Maddox
LLLishu Liu
Lishu Liu
Minghe SunMinghe Sun
Minghe Sun
Over 20 studies have been published in the past decade involving file and data type classification for digital forensics and information security applications. Methods using n-grams as inputs have proven the most successful across a wide variety of types; however, there are mixed results regarding the utility of unigrams and bigrams as inputs independently. In this study, we use support vector machines (SVMs) consisting of unigrams and bigrams, as well as complexity and other byte frequency-based measures, as inputs. Using concatenated unigrams and bigrams as input and a linear kernel SVM, we achieve significantly improved results over those previously reported (73.4% classification rate across 38 file and data types). We are the first to use concatenated n-grams as the sole input, and we show their superiority over inputs used previously. We also found that too many different types of features as inputs result in overfitting and poor generalization properties. We include several types seldom or not studied in the past (Microsoft Office 2010 files, file system data, base64, base85, URL encoding, flash video, M4A, MP4, WMV, and JSON records). The “winning” approach is instantiated in an open source software tool called Sceadan - Systematic Classification Engine for Advanced Data ANalysis.

27 January 2022 in Forensic Science International: Synergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSamuel Henrique Silva
Samuel Henrique Silva
MBMazal Bethany
Mazal Bethany
AVAlexis Megan Votto
Alexis Megan Votto
ISIan Henry Scarff
Ian Henry Scarff
NBNicole Beebe
Nicole Beebe
PNPeyman Najafirad
Peyman Najafirad
Deepfakes have become exponentially more common and sophisticated in recent years, so much so that forensic specialists, policy makers, and the public alike are anxious about their role in spreading disinformation. Recently, the detection and creation of such forgery became a popular research topic, leading to significant growth in publications related to the creation of deepfakes, detection methods, and datasets containing the latest deepfake creation methods. The most successful approaches in identifying and preventing deepfakes are deep learning methods that rely on convolutional neural networks as the backbone for a binary classification task. A convolutional neural network extracts the underlying patterns from the input frames. It feeds these to a binary classification fully connected network, which classifies these patterns as trustworthy or untrustworthy. We claim that this method is not ideal in a scenario in which the generation algorithms constantly evolve since the detection algorithm is not robust enough to detect comparably minor artifacts introduced by the generation algorithms. This work proposes a hierarchical explainable forensics algorithm that incorporates humans in the detection loop. We curate the data through a deep learning detection algorithm and share an explainable decision to humans alongside a set of forensic analyses on the decision region. On the detection side, we propose an attention-based explainable deepfake detection algorithm. We address this generalization issue by implementing an ensemble of standard and attention-based data-augmented detection networks. We use the attention blocks to evaluate the face regions where the model focuses its decision. We simultaneously drop and enlarge the region to push the model to base its decision on more regions of the face, while maintaining a specific focal point for its decision. In this case, we use an ensemble of models to improve the generalization. We also evaluate the models’ decision using Grad-CAM explanation to focus on the attention maps. The region uncovered by the explanation layer is cropped and undergoes a series of frequency and statistical analyses that help humans decide if the frame is real or fake. We evaluate our model in one of the most challenging datasets, the DFDC, and achieve an accuracy of 92.4%. We successfully maintain this accuracy in datasets not used in the training process.

1 January 2015
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MMMichele Maasberg
Michele Maasberg
JWJohn Warren
John Warren
NBNicole Beebe
Nicole Beebe
Efforts to understand what goes on in the mind of an insider have taken a back seat to developing technical controls, yet insider threat incidents persist. We examine insider threat incidents with malicious intent and propose an explanation through a relationship between Dark Triad personality traits and the insider threat. Although Dark Triad personality traits have emerged in insider threat cases and deviant workplace behavior studies, they have not been labeled as such and little empirical research has examined this phenomenon. This paper builds on previous research on insider threat and introduces ten propositions concerning the relationship between Dark Triad personality traits and insider threat behavior. We include behavioral antecedents based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Capability Means Opportunity (CMO) model and the factors affecting those antecedents. This research addresses the behavioral aspect of the insider threat and provides new information in support of academics and practitioners.

1 November 2011 in Decision Support Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicole Beebe
Nicole Beebe
JCJan Guynes Clark
Jan Guynes Clark
GDGlenn B. Dietrich
Glenn B. Dietrich
MKMyung S. Ko
Myung S. Ko
DKDaijin Ko
Daijin Ko