Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common pathogen, causes infectious complications and affects long-term survival after transplantation. Studies examining living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are limited. This study analyzed the risk factors for CMV infection and its impact on the survival of LDLT patients. A nested case–control design retrospectively analyzed data from 952 patients who underwent LDLT from 2005–2021. The incidence of CMV infection for the study cohort was 15.2% at 3 months for LDLT patients managed preemptively. Patients with CMV infections were matched with those without the infection at corresponding time points (index postoperative day) in a 1:2 ratio. Graft survival was significantly lower in the CMV infection group than in the control group. CMV infection was an independent risk factor for graft survival in the matched cohort (HR 1.93, p = 0.012). Independent risk factors for CMV infection were female sex (HR 2.4, p = 0.003), pretransplant MELD (HR 1.06, p = 0.004), pretransplant in-hospital stay (HR 1.83, p = 0.030), ABO incompatibility (HR 2.10, p = 0.009), donor macrovesicular steatosis ≥10% (HR 2.01, p = 0.030), and re-operation before index POD (HR 2.51, p = 0.035). CMV infection is an independent survival risk factor, and its risk factors should be included in the surveillance and treatment of CMV infections after LDLT.

Background: The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage. Materials and methods: This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT (n=205) or waiting-DDLT (n=444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed. Results: Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P<0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48–0.79; P<0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73–4.75; P=0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P=0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher. Conclusions: Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages.

Purpose: Unusual grafts, including extended left liver plus caudate lobe, right anterior section, and right posterior section grafts, are alternatives to left and right lobe grafts for living-donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate unusual grafts from the perspectives of recipients and donors. Methods: From 2016 to 2021, 497 patients received living-donor liver transplantation at Severance Hospital. Among them, 10 patients received unusual grafts. Three patients received extended left liver plus caudate lobe grafts, two patients received right anterior section grafts, and five patients received right posterior section grafts. Liver volumetrics and anatomy were analyzed for all recipients and donors. We collected data on laboratory examinations (alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio), imaging studies, graft survival, and complications. A 1:2 ratio propensity-score matching method was used to reduce selection bias and balance variables between the unusual and conventional graft groups. Results: The median of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of unusual graft recipients was 13.5 (interquartile range 11.5–19.3) and that of graft–recipient weight ratio was 0.767 (0.7–0.9). ABO incompatibility was observed in four cases. The alanine aminotransferase level, total bilirubin level, and international normalized ratio decreased in both recipients and donors. Unusual and conventional grafts had similar survival rates (p = 0.492). The right and left subgroups did not differ from each counter-conventional subgroup (p = 0.339 and p = 0.695, respectively). The incidence of major complications was not significantly different between unusual and conventional graft recipients (p = 0.513). Wound seromas were reported by unusual graft donors; the complication ratio was similar to that in conventional graft donors (p = 0.169). Conclusion: Although unusual grafts require a complex indication, they may show feasible surgical outcomes for recipients with an acceptable donor complication.

Kim DG, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug;38(35):e274. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e274