Liming Lu

Dr. Liming Lu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in JAMA Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChangchang Li
Changchang Li
XTXiaoqiong Tang
Xiaoqiong Tang
XZXiaoyan Zheng
Xiaoyan Zheng
SGShuqi Ge
Shuqi Ge
HWHao Wen
Hao Wen
LLLiming Lu
Liming Lu
Quiz Ref ID Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a T-cell–mediated and chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the oral mucosa,1 with an incidence that is higher in women than in men. The affected age range varies around the world,2 and the disease is rare in children.3 Smokers and patients who abuse alcohol have a higher prevalence of OLP.4

18 December 2018 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWChunxiao Wu
Chunxiao Wu
QYQu Yi
Qu Yi
XZXiaoyan Zheng
Xiaoyan Zheng
SCShaoyang Cui
Shaoyang Cui
BCBin Chen
Bin Chen
CTChunzhi Tang
Chunzhi Tang

1 December 2018 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CWChunxiao Wu
Chunxiao Wu
PLPeihui Liu
Peihui Liu
HFHuaili Fu
Huaili Fu
WCWentao Chen
Wentao Chen
SCShaoyang Cui
Shaoyang Cui
CTChunzhi Tang
Chunzhi Tang
Background: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), as a noninvasive intervention, has beneficial effects on major depressive disorder based on clinical observations. However, the potential benefits and clinical role of taVNS in the treatment of major depressive disorder are still uncertain and have not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of taVNS in treating major depressive disorder. Methods: Four electronic databases, namely, Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO, were searched for all related trials published through May 1, 2018. We extracted the basic information and data of the included studies and evaluated the methodological quality with the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the nonrandomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. A meta-analysis of the comparative effects was conducted using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: A total of 423 citations from the databases were searched, and 4 studies with 222 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The taVNS technique could decrease 24-item HAMD scores more than the sham intervention (MD: −4.23, 95% CI: −7.15, −1.31; P = .005) and was also more effective in decreasing Self-Rating Depression Scale scores ((MD: −10.34, 95% CI: −13.48, −7.20; P < .00001), Beck Depression Inventory scores (MD: −10.3, 95% CI: −18.1, −2.5; P = .01) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores (MD: −6.57, 95% CI: −9.30, −3.84; P < .00001). However, there was no significant difference in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores between the taVNS and sham taVNS groups (MD: −1.12, 95% CI: −2.56, 0.32; P = .13). No obvious adverse effects of taVNS treatment were reported in the included studies. Conclusion: The results of the analysis preliminarily demonstrated that taVNS therapy can effectively ameliorate the symptoms of major depressive disorder, providing an alternative technique for addressing depression. However, more well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes and follow-ups are needed in future studies to confirm our findings.

28 March 2019 in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWChunxiao Wu
Chunxiao Wu
YZYan Zheng
Yan Zheng
YDYuting Duan
Yuting Duan
XLXin Lai
Xin Lai
SCShaoyang Cui
Shaoyang Cui
LLLiming Lu
Liming Lu

7 August 2018 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYuting Duan
Yuting Duan
LLLiming Lu
Liming Lu
JCJuexuan Chen
Juexuan Chen
CWChunxiao Wu
Chunxiao Wu
JLJielin Liang
Jielin Liang
CTChunzhi Tang
Chunzhi Tang
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia with cognitive decline as one of the core symptoms in older adults. Numerous studies have suggested the value of psychosocial interventions to improve cognition in this population, but which one should be preferred are still matters of controversy. Consequently, we aim to compare and rank different psychosocial interventions in the management of mild to moderate AD with cognitive symptoms. We did a network meta-analysis to identify both direct and indirect evidence in relevant studies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO through the OVID database, CENTRAL through the Cochrane Library for clinical randomized controlled trials investigating psychosocial interventions of cognitive symptoms in patients with Alzheimer disease, published up to August 31, 2017. We included trials of home-based exercise(HE), group exercise(GE), walking program(WP), reminiscence therapy(RT), art therapy(AT) or the combination of psychosocial interventions and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (ChEIs). We extracted the relevant information from these trials with a predefined data extraction sheet and assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The outcomes investigated were Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) and compliance. We did a pair-wise meta-analysis using the fixed-effects model and then did a random-effects network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework. We deemed 10 trials eligible, including 682 patients and 11 treatments. The quality of included study was rated as low in most comparison with Cochrane tools. Treatment effects from the network meta-analysis showed WP was better than control (SMD 4.89, 95% CI -0.07 to 10.00) while cognitive training and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (CT + ChEIs) was significantly better than the other treatments, when compared with simple ChEIs treatment, assessed by MMSE. In terms of compliance, the pair-wise meta-analysis indicated that WP and HE are better than GE and AT, while CT + ChEIs, CST + ChEIs are better than other combined interventions. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for improving cognition or slowing down the progression of cognitive impairment in AD patients and recommended several interventions for clinical practice.

6 June 2022 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLiming Lu
Liming Lu
YZYuqing Zhang
Yuqing Zhang
SGShuqi Ge
Shuqi Ge
HWHao Wen
Hao Wen
XTXiaorong Tang
Xiaorong Tang
NXNenggui Xu
Nenggui Xu
Objective To provide a route map regarding systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture therapies that will meet two goals: (1) to identify areas in which more or better evidence is required and (2) to identify acupuncture applications that, although proven effective, remain underused in practice, and thus warrant more effective knowledge dissemination. Eligibility criteria We included SRs that conducted meta-analyses (MAs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for this overview. Information sources We searched for SRs without language restrictions from January 2015 to November 2020 in four Chinese electronic databases and Epistemonikos database. And we also searched for newly published RCTs that were eligible for selected best SRs in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and four Chinese electronic databases from its lasted search dates to November 2020. Synthesis of results We reanalysed the selected MAs if new primary studies were added. We used random-effect model to calculate the overall effect. Results Our search identified 120 SRs published in the last 5 years addressing acupuncture therapies across 12 therapeutic areas and 77 diseases and conditions. The SRs included 205 outcomes and involved 138 995 participants from 1402 RCTs. We constructed 77 evidence matrices, including 120 SRs and their included RCTs in the Epistemonikos database. Seventy-seven SRs represented the effect estimate of acupuncture therapies. Finally, we system summarised the areas of possible underutilisation of acupuncture therapies (high or moderate certainty evidence of large or moderate effects), and the areas of warranting additional investigation of acupuncture therapies (low or very low certainty evidence of moderate or large effects). Conclusion The evidence maps and overview of SRs on acupuncture therapies identified both therapies with substantial benefits that may require more assertive evidence dissemination and promising acupuncture therapies that require further investigation.