Biomechanical features of the handstand, one of the most fundamental skills required for artistic gymnastics events, have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to clarify the kinematics and joint moment profiles during straight arm press to handstand in different highly skilled male gymnasts. Fifty-nine male gymnasts performed a straight arm press to handstand on a force platform and were judged on their performance by experienced certified judges. Subjects were divided into two groups (highly-skilled and less-skilled). Kinematic data were obtained using a video camera synchronized with force platform. Joint moments (wrist, shoulder, hip) during each straight arm press to handstand were calculated using the inverse dynamics solution. Larger shoulder flexion moments were observed in less-skilled compared with highly- skilled performers (at 3–59%,p< 0.001) while larger hip flexion moments were observed in highly- skilled performers at 52% (p= 0.045) and 56% (p= 0.048) and normalized time of straight arm press to handstand. Major differences between highly-skilled and less-skilled performers were observed in hip joint moment production as it shifted from extension to flexion from the leg horizontal position to the handstand position in highly-skilled gymnasts. Successful straight arm press to handstand techniques observed in highly-skilled performers were characterized as a more acute pike position at toe-off as well as hip flexor moments at latter phase of the straight arm press to handstand.

Background/Objectives: In pole vaulting, the capacity to store elastic energy within the pole (E_pole) significantly influences performance. This study investigated the characteristics of E_pole storage by analyzing the box reaction force and vector angle. Methods: Eight male pole vaulters, including World Championships participants, were examined. A motion capture system (VICON) and force plates (Kistler) were used to measure the vector angle (angle between the compression force (CF) and box reaction force vectors) and horizontal velocity of the center of gravity (COG) (Vcogh). E_pole was calculated as the integral of the CF (estimated from the box reaction forces), and pole bending displacement. The relationships between each variable and the peak height of COG (HP) were assessed using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficients. Results: HP correlated with Vcogh in the pole plant (PP) (r = 0.82) and E_pole (r = 0.94). Vaulters with a higher HP maintained a vector angle < 2° between 20% and 80% of the pole bending phase, indicating closer directional alignment between the box reaction force vector and pole chord direction, whereas vaulters with lower HP exhibited larger vector angles (4–8°), associated with a relative reduction in the axial component of force transmitted to the pole. Conclusions: A smaller vector angle effectively enhanced the CF, thereby increasing pole bending and promoting greater accumulation of E_pole. Therefore, maintaining a small vector angle may enable more effective force transmission along the pole chord, and vector angle characteristics and PP horizontal velocity may assist appropriate pole selection and training strategies to enhance elastic energy storage and performance.