Shiyou Wu

Dr. Shiyou Wu

School of Social Work, Arizona State University, Pheonix, AZ 85004, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMark W. Fraser
Mark W. Fraser
BLBrianna M. Lombardi
Brianna M. Lombardi
Shiyou WuShiyou Wu
Shiyou Wu
LZLisa de Saxe Zerden
Lisa de Saxe Zerden
ERErica L. Richman
Erica L. Richman
EFErin P. Fraher
Erin P. Fraher
Objective: Behavioral and physical health services are increasingly being integrated, with care provided by interprofessional teams of physicians, nurses, social workers, and other professionals. The objective of this study was to describe the functions of social workers on interprofessional teams in primary care and to assess the impact of interprofessional teams that include social workers in integrated care settings. Method: We undertook a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of routine vs. integrated primary care where social workers served on interprofessional teams. A 5-phase search process to identify RCTs from 9 electronic databases and the gray literature published between 2000 and 2016 was used. We calculated effect sizes across identified studies and conducted 2 subsample meta-analyses for behavioral health outcomes. Results: The searches recovered 502 citations. After screening, 107 reports were retained for a full-text review, and 32 of those (from 26 RCTs) met stu...

27 March 2019 in Aging & Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XXXiaoling Xiang
Xiaoling Xiang
Shiyou WuShiyou Wu
Shiyou Wu
AZAshley Zuverink
Ashley Zuverink
KTKathryn N. Tomasino
Kathryn N. Tomasino
RARuopeng An
Ruopeng An
JHJoseph A. Himle
Joseph A. Himle
Background: This study aimed to review and synthesize evidence related to the effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for reducing depressive symptoms in older adults. Method: The authors conducted a systematic review of intervention studies testing iCBT for symptoms of depression in older adults. An initial search of PubMed, PsychINFO, and Web of Science was undertaken, followed by a manual search of reference lists of the relevant articles. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to appraise study quality. The mean effect size for included studies was estimated in a random effects model. Meta-regression was used to examine potential moderators of effect sizes. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1272 participants averaging 66 years of age. The study design included randomized controlled trials (k = 3), controlled trials without randomization (k = 2), uncontrolled trials (k = 2), and naturalistic evaluation (k = 2). Seven studies tested iCBT with some level of therapist involvement and 2 examined self-guided iCBT. Six studies tested interventions specifically adapted for older adults. The mean within-group effect size was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.09, 1.45) and the mean between-group effect size was 1.18 (95% CI = 0.63, 1.73). Participants’ age was negatively associated with within-group effect sizes (b = −0.06, p = .016). Conclusions: iCBT is a promising approach for reducing depressive symptoms among older adults with mild to moderate depressive symptoms. However, studies involving older adults in iCBT trials were limited, had considerable heterogeneity, and were of low quality, calling for more studies with rigorous designs to produce a best-practice guideline.

13 March 2015 in Social Indicators Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJin Huang
Jin Huang
Shiyou WuShiyou Wu
Shiyou Wu
SDSuo Deng
Suo Deng

1 June 2016 in Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Shiyou WuShiyou Wu
Shiyou Wu
DWDiane C. Wyant
Diane C. Wyant
MFMark W. Fraser
Mark W. Fraser
This article describes author guidelines for developing qualitative manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals. The article explains the process used in the development of qualitative guidelines for JSSWR. The Journal sought to develop a set of guidelines, not as a prescribed checklist, but as benchmarks or, perhaps, touchstones to ensure that readers have sufficient information to fully understand qualitative research procedures. Qualitative research is diverse and guidelines—no matter how expertly crafted—will apply differentially. The guidelines presented here aim to offer authors practical advice toward increasing the clarity of reporting.

1 May 2018 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXue Zhao
Xue Zhao
JMJing Ma
Jing Ma
Shiyou WuShiyou Wu
Shiyou Wu
ICIris Chi
Iris Chi
ZBZhenggang Bai
Zhenggang Bai