Jonathan Mosley

Dr. Jonathan Mosley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2023 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBCorey D. Broeckling
Corey D. Broeckling
Richard BegerRichard Beger
Richard Beger
LCLeo L. Cheng
Leo L. Cheng
RCRaquel Cumeras
Raquel Cumeras
DCDaniel J. Cuthbertson
Daniel J. Cuthbertson
JMJonathan Mosley
Jonathan Mosley
Untargeted metabolomics is an analytical approach with numerous applications serving as an effective metabolic phenotyping platform to characterize small molecules within a biological system. Data quality can be challenging to evaluate and demonstrate in metabolomics experiments. This has driven the use of pooled quality control (QC) samples for monitoring and, if necessary, correcting for analytical variance introduced during sample preparation and data acquisition stages. Described herein is a scoping literature review detailing the use of pooled QC samples in published untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based metabolomics studies. A literature query was performed, the list of papers was filtered, and suitable articles were randomly sampled. In total, 109 papers were each reviewed by at least five reviewers, answering predefined questions surrounding the use of pooled quality control samples. The results of the review indicate that use of pooled QC samples has been relatively widely adopted by the metabolomics community and that it is used at a similar frequency across biological taxa and sample types in both small- and large-scale studies. However, while many studies generated and analyzed pooled QC samples, relatively few reported the use of pooled QC samples to improve data quality. This demonstrates a clear opportunity for the field to more frequently utilize pooled QC samples for quality reporting, feature filtering, analytical drift correction, and metabolite annotation. Additionally, our survey approach enabled us to assess the ambiguity in the reporting of the methods used to describe the generation and use of pooled QC samples. This analysis indicates that many details of the QC framework are missing or unclear, limiting the reader's ability to determine which QC steps have been taken. Collectively, these results capture the current state of pooled QC sample usage and highlight existing strengths and deficiencies as they are applied in untargeted LC-MS metabolomics.

3 January 2019 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Richard BegerRichard Beger
Richard Beger
WDWarwick Dunn
Warwick Dunn
ABAbbas Bandukwala
Abbas Bandukwala
BBBianca Bethan
Bianca Bethan
DBDavid I Broadhurst
David I Broadhurst
Krista ZanettiKrista Zanetti
Krista Zanetti


12 February 2024 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJonathan Mosley
Jonathan Mosley
TSTracey B. Schock
Tracey B. Schock
CBChris W. Beecher
Chris W. Beecher
WDWarwick B. Dunn
Warwick B. Dunn
Julia KuligowskiJulia Kuligowski
Julia Kuligowski
Krista ZanettiKrista Zanetti
Krista Zanetti
Background: Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) practices are key tenets that facilitate study and data quality across all applications of untargeted metabolomics. These important practices will strengthen this field and accelerate its success. The Best Practices Working Group (WG) within the Metabolomics Quality Assurance and Quality Control Consortium (mQACC) focuses on community use of QA/QC practices and protocols and aims to identify, catalogue, harmonize, and disseminate current best practices in untargeted metabolomics through community-driven activities. Aim of review: A present goal of the Best Practices WG is to develop a working strategy, or roadmap, that guides the actions of practitioners and progress in the field. The framework in which mQACC operates promotes the harmonization and dissemination of current best QA/QC practice guidance and encourages widespread adoption of these essential QA/QC activities for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Key scientific concepts of review: Community engagement and QA/QC information gathering activities have been occurring through conference workshops, virtual and in-person interactive forum discussions, and community surveys. Seven principal QC stages prioritized by internal discussions of the Best Practices WG have received participant input, feedback and discussion. We outline these stages, each involving a multitude of activities, as the framework for identifying QA/QC best practices. The ultimate planned product of these endeavors is a “living guidance” document of current QA/QC best practices for untargeted metabolomics that will grow and change with the evolution of the field.

1 November 2015 in Chemical Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAM.K. Assefa
M.K. Assefa
JDJ.L. Devera
J.L. Devera
ABA.D. Brathwaite
A.D. Brathwaite
JMJonathan Mosley
Jonathan Mosley
MDM.A. Duncan
M.A. Duncan

27 July 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCTimothy C. Cheng
Timothy C. Cheng
BBBiswajit Bandyopadhyay
Biswajit Bandyopadhyay
JMJonathan Mosley
Jonathan Mosley
MDMichael A. Duncan
Michael A. Duncan