Edward Cheng

Prof. Dr. Edward Cheng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 April 2007 in International Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SUSlif D. Ulrich
Slif D. Ulrich
TSThorsten M. Seyler
Thorsten M. Seyler
DBDerek Bennett
Derek Bennett
RDRonald E. Delanois
Ronald E. Delanois
KSKhaled J Saleh
Khaled J Saleh
MMMichael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont
Primary total hip arthroplasties have reported success rates of greater than 95% in many series with a longer than 10-year follow-up. Revision total hip arthroplasty due to such factors as increased high-activity levels, younger patients undergoing the procedure and increasing life expectancy has become more prevalent. An understanding of the mechanisms and timing of total hip arthroplasty failure can direct efforts aimed at reducing revision rates. This study was conducted to evaluate the indications for revision hip arthroplasty and relate these to the time after the index primary hip arthroplasty. A review of all revision hip arthroplasties at two centres over a 6-year time period identified 225 patients who underwent 237 revisions. The overall mean time to revision was 83 months (range: 0–360 months). The cause of failure was aseptic loosening in 123 hips (51.9%), instability in 40 hips (16.9%) and infection in 37 hips (5.5%). When stratified into two groups (less than 5 years, more than 5 years after the index primary hip arthroplasty), 118 of 237 (50%) revisions occurred in less than 5 years, with 33% due to instability and 24% resulting from infection. The majority of the causes of failure within 5 years in these early revisions were instability and deep infection. The success of hip arthroplasty is likely to be compromized if technical aspects of the surgery for appropriate component positioning and critical protocols to minimise complications such as infection are not given the proper attention.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJeremy T. Hines
Jeremy T. Hines
WJWoo-Lam Jo
Woo-Lam Jo
QCQuanjun Cui
Quanjun Cui
MMMichael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont
KKKyung-Hoi Koo
Kyung-Hoi Koo
JPJung-Wee Park
Jung-Wee Park
Hines JT, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May;36(24):e177. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e177

15 August 1999 in Spine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEdward Cheng
Edward Cheng
RÖRemzi A. Özerdemoglu
Remzi A. Özerdemoglu
ETEnsor E. Transfeldt
Ensor E. Transfeldt
RTRoby C. Jr. Thompson
Roby C. Jr. Thompson
Study Design. Retrospective analysis. Objectives. To analyze the prognostic factors in patients with chordomas, the success of various treatments, the diagnostic value of open versus needle biopsy, the neurologic impairment after sacral nerve resection, and the clinical presentation and site of origin. Summary of Background Data. Staging of chordomas has not been of much value, compared with other bone tumors, because for chordomas, grade is similar, metastasis is infrequent at presentation, and the prognostic significance of size is uncertain. Methods. A review of patients with chordoma from 1965 through 1996 found 23 cases (mean age of patients, 55 years). The mean follow-up was 84 months. Mean tumor size was 81 mm (range, 35–135 mm), location was lumbar (n = 6), S1 (n = 4), S2 (n = 3), S3 (n = 7), S4 (n = 2), and S5 (n = 1). Results. No tumors were found in the higher sacrum (S1–S2) alone, without involvement of the lower sacrum. Survival analysis at 5 years showed overall survival (OS) 86%, continuous disease-free survival (CDFS) 58%, and local recurrence–free survival (LRFS) 60%. The location of tumor, defined by highest level of involvement (lumbar vs.— sacrum) was of prognostic significance for OS (P = 0.01; log-rank test), CDFS (P = 0.036), but not for LRFS (P = 0.189). Results of multivariate regression showed that location was significant for OS (P = 0.007), CDFS (P = 0.008), and LRFS (P = 0.001). For patients with positive margins (n = 16), initial radiation correlated with longer CDFS (P = 0.002; Mantel–Cox) and LRFS (P = 0.005, Mantel–Cox), but was not significant for OS (P = 0.41).—For patients who received no radiation, a positive margin correlated with a shorter CDFS (P = 0.04), a trend to shorter LRFS (P = 0.08), but no difference in OS. Therefore, both a tumor-free margin and initial radiation correlated with a longer survival. No patients had urinary or bowel dysfunction when both S3 nerves were preserved. If one S3 nerve was preserved, 1 of 3 patients had partial urinary incontinence and 2 of 3 patients required bowel medications. If both S3 nerves were resected, all patients required intermittent urinary catheterization and bowel medications. If both S2 nerves were resected, there was complete urinary and bowel incontinence. Conclusions. The highest level of tumor involvement was prognostically significant for OS, CDFS, and LRFS. Radiation was of value when complete excision was not achieved. Bilateral S3 nerve preservation is necessary to ensure retention of normal urinary and bowel function.—

1 February 1996 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEdward Cheng
Edward Cheng
KDKathryn E. Dusenbery
Kathryn E. Dusenbery
MWMargaret R. Winters
Margaret R. Winters
RTRoby C. Thompson
Roby C. Thompson

1 November 2009 in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSVivek Sharma
Vivek Sharma
ECEdward Cheng
Edward Cheng
(3) factors associated with relapse. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 49 patients with previously untreated PVNS of the knee (12 localized, 37 diffuse) who were treated with synovectomy from 1991 to 2008; there were 22 males and 27 females, with mean age of 35.2 years (range, 10–73). Minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 6.2 years; range, 1–13). Twenty-one patients had a relapse. The RFS for index surgery was 75% and 53%; and for salvage surgery was 71% and 52% at 2 and 5 years respectively. The RFS was 95% for open versus 62% for arthroscopic synovectomy at 2 years, 71% and 41% at 5 years. The RFS was 91% for localized and 70% for diffuse PVNS at 2 years, 73% and 48% at 5 years. Diffuse disease (RR = 4.49) and arthroscopic synovectomy (RR = 3.30) were associated with relapse. Recurrence was frequent after synovectomy. Reexcision can salvage relapses as successfully as excision for primary disease; however, morbidity was associated with additional surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence....

19 June 2015 in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHo-Rim Choi
Ho-Rim Choi
MSMarvin E. Steinberg
Marvin E. Steinberg
ECEdward Cheng
Edward Cheng