Background: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is effective to prevent arrhythmia episode–related implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. However, recurrences in noninducible patients at programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) are substantial. Methods and Results: From May 2013 to September 2015, 218 PVSs were performed 6 days (5–7) after ablation (186 noninvasive programmed stimulations and 32 invasive PVS) in 210 consecutive patients (ischemic, 48%; median left ventricular ejection fraction, 37%; syncope, 35% with trauma associated 6%), while patients were awake and under β-blocker therapy. After ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillators were programmed according to noninvasive programmed stimulations results (class A—noninducible; class B—nondocumented inducible VT; and class C—documented inducible VT), with high and delayed VT detection intervals. Concordance between PVS end procedure and PVS day 6 was 67%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were higher for PVS day 6 (53% and 88% versus 43% and 71%). Ischemic and patients with preserved ejection fraction showed the highest negative predictive value (91% and 96%). Among 46 of 174 (26%) noninducible patients at PVS end procedure, but inducible at day 6, 59% had VT recurrence at 1-year follow-up; recurrences were 9% when both studies were noninducible. There were no inappropriate shocks; incidence of syncope was 3%; and none was harmful. The rate of appropriate shocks per patient per month according to noninvasive programmed stimulations results was significantly reduced, comparing the month before and after ablation (class A: 2 [0.75–4] versus 0; class B: 2 [1–4] versus 0; class C: 2 [1–4] versus 0; P <0.001). Conclusions: PVS at day 6 predicts VT recurrence more accurately allowing to identify patients who might benefit from a redo ablation and addressing implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming.

Background: after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electric devices (CIEDs), some patients may not benefit from device reimplantation. This study sought to analyse predictors and long-term outcome of patients after TLE with vs. without reimplantation in a high-volume centre. Methods: all patients undergoing TLE at our centre between January 2010 and November 2015 were included into this analysis. Results: a total of 223 patients (median age 70 years, 22.0% female) were included into the study. Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) was the most common device (40.4%) followed by pacemaker (PM) (31.4%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (26.9%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy-PM (CRT-P) (1.4%). TLE was performed due to infection (55.6%), malfunction (35.9%), system upgrade (6.7%) or other causes (1.8%). In 14.8%, no reimplantation was performed after TLE. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no preventable arrhythmia-related events were documented in the no-reimplantation group, but 11.8% received a new CIED after 17–84 months. While there was no difference in short-term survival, five-year survival was significantly lower in the no-reimplantation group (78.3% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.014). Conclusions: in patients undergoing TLE, a re-evaluation of the indication for reimplantation is safe and effective. Reimplantation was not related to preventable arrhythmia events, but all-cause survival was lower.

Premature Ventricular Complexes (PVCs) are among the most frequent ventricular arrhythmias observed in daily cardiology practice. Although often benign, sustained high ectopic activity can result in left ventricular dysfunction known as PVC-induced Cardiomyopathy (PVC-CMP), a condition that is frequently reversible when the arrhythmia is effectively suppressed. The underlying mechanisms are multifaceted, involving electromechanical dyssynchrony, contractile inefficiency, abnormal calcium cycling, neurohormonal activation, and progressive structural remodeling. The likelihood of developing PVC-CMP varies among individuals and is influenced by electrophysiological and structural factors. Diagnosis relies on prolonged rhythm monitoring, comprehensive multimodality imaging, and demonstration of ventricular recovery after reducing the ectopic burden, which, in turn, confirms causality. Over the past decade, major advances in electrocardiographic mapping, cardiac imaging, and ablation therapy have transformed this field, demonstrating excellent efficacy and safety profiles. In parallel, artificial intelligence and computational mapping are emerging as powerful tools for prediction and procedural guidance. Recognition of PVC-CMP as a distinct, treatable cardiomyopathy highlights the importance of early detection and individualized therapy, offering the prospect of complete functional recovery and the prevention of heart failure progression.