The aim of this study was to analyze whether subgroups of immunosuppressive (IS) medications conferred different outcomes in COVID-19. The study involved a multicenter retrospective cohort of consecutive immunosuppressed patients (ISPs) hospitalized with COVID-19 from March to July, 2020. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A propensity score-matched (PSM) model comparing ISP and non-ISP was planned, as well as specific PSM models comparing individual IS medications associated with mortality. Out of 16 647 patients, 868 (5.2%) were on chronic IS therapy prior to admission and were considered ISPs. In the PSM model, ISPs had greater in-hospital mortality (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.99–1.62), which was related to a worse outcome associated with chronic corticoids (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43–2.49). Other IS drugs had no repercussions with regard to mortality risk (including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI); OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.65–2.20). In the pre-planned specific PSM model involving patients on chronic IS treatment before admission, corticosteroids were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.43–3.82). Chronic IS therapies comprise a heterogeneous group of drugs with different risk profiles for severe COVID-19 and death. Chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy is associated with increased mortality. On the contrary, CNI and other IS treatments prior to admission do not seem to convey different outcomes.

(1) Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics and clinical course of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases (ADs) compared to the general population. (2) Methods: We used information available in the nationwide Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, which retrospectively compiles data from the first admission of adult patients with COVID-19. We selected all patients with ADs included in the registry and compared them to the remaining patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during admission, readmission, and subsequent admissions, and secondary outcomes were a composite outcome including the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), or death, as well as in-hospital complications. (3) Results: A total of 13,940 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included, of which 362 (2.6%) had an AD. Patients with ADs were older, more likely to be female, and had greater comorbidity. On the multivariate logistic regression analysis, which involved the inverse propensity score weighting method, AD as a whole was not associated with an increased risk of any of the outcome variables. Habitual treatment with corticosteroids (CSs), age, Barthel Index score, and comorbidity were associated with poor outcomes. Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were associated with a decrease in mortality in patients with AD. (4) Conclusions: The analysis of the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry shows that ADs do not lead to a different prognosis, measured by mortality, complications, or the composite outcome. Considered individually, it seems that some diseases entail a different prognosis than that of the general population. Immunosuppressive/immunoregulatory treatments (IST) prior to admission had variable effects.

Background: Sex-related differences in outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation remain incompletely understood. Although women receive ICDs less frequently, whether their long-term survival differs from that of men in real-world clinical practice is not well established. We aimed to evaluate sex-specific mortality and relative survival in a large consecutive cohort of ICD recipients from a tertiary hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation at a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2025. Demographic features, device indication, and mortality were obtained through clinical records. Relative survival (observed vs. expected) was estimated using the Ederer II method with national life tables. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effect of sex on mortality. Results: A total of 1091 patients (82.1% men; mean age 63.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. During a mean follow-up of 4.33 ± 3.22 years, 230 patients died (21.1%). Women showed lower unadjusted all-cause mortality than men: 24 deaths (18.0%) vs. 206 (20.6%). Women had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (41.5 ± 23.6% vs. 37.2 ± 18.1%, p = 0.0046), less ischemic cardiomyopathy, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although univariable analysis suggested lower mortality in women (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.90; p = 0.014), multivariable analysis indicated that sex was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.53–1.26). Relative survival revealed a substantial long-term mortality burden in ICD carriers, especially in men: men: 4-year survival 82.3% (expected 93.2%); 8-year 66.7% (85.6%); 12-year 56.0% (76.8%); women: 4-year survival 89.1% (expected 96.7%); 8-year 77.1% (92.8%); 12-year 77.1% (89.2%). Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort of ICD recipients, women showed lower unadjusted mortality and a smaller excess mortality compared with the general population. However, sex was not an independent predictor of survival after multivariable adjustment. These findings may indicate that observed survival differences are largely explained by differences in clinical profile and comorbidity burden rather than by sex itself.