Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) is one of the most important pathogens in ophthalmology. Reactivation may involve the adnexa (blepharoconjunctivitis, pseudomembranous conjunctivitis), cornea (dendritic keratitis, nummular and necrotizing stromal keratitis, disciform endotheliitis, neurotrophic ulcers, mucous-plaque keratitis) and sclera (episcleritis, anterior scleritis). Uveal inflammation ranges from anterior uveitis—with iris atrophy, trabeculitis-induced glaucoma and complicated cataract—to posterior necrotizing syndromes: acute retinal necrosis in immunocompetent hosts and progressive outer retinal necrosis in immunosuppressed patients, often complicated by occlusive vasculitis, macular edema, retinal detachment and phthisis. Optic nerve and cranial nerve involvement (optic neuritis, neuroretinitis, III/IV/VI palsies) and orbital inflammation may occur even without cutaneous signs (“zoster sine herpete”), making PCR-based intraocular diagnostics essential. Management relies on early, high-dose antivirals (acyclovir or valacyclovir), judicious corticosteroids and timely surgical intervention when required. Universal childhood varicella vaccination and recombinant zoster vaccination in adults ≥50 years have reduced VZV incidence and ocular complications in settings with high vaccine coverage, though rare post-vaccine keratitis or uveitis underscore the need for ongoing vigilance. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on varicella-zoster virus ocular disease, with a focus on host–pathogen interactions that drive both injury and defense.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy by restoring anti-tumor immunity, but immune activation can disrupt ocular immune homeostasis and induce ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (OirAEs). Although uncommon, OirAEs may involve nearly all ocular compartments and can cause irreversible visual impairment or interruption of effective anticancer therapy. The 2025 international consensus criteria now provide a standardized framework for defining and classifying OirAEs. This review integrates current evidence on ICI-associated ocular toxicity, with emphasis on tissue-specific immune mechanisms and their clinical implications. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways may impair ocular immune privilege, expand autoreactive T-cell subsets, alter cytokine and chemokine networks, and amplify autoantibody-mediated retinal injury. These processes provide a plausible framework for understanding diverse phenotypes, including uveitis, ocular surface disease, optic neuritis, orbital inflammation, ocular myopathy, and retinopathy. We also outline a mechanism-informed management approach that balances visual preservation with maintenance of systemic anti-tumor immunity. Local corticosteroid therapy, cautious systemic immunosuppression, and selected steroid-sparing biologics should be individualized according to severity, anatomical involvement, and the oncologic context. Together, these insights support a consensus-based and mechanism-informed framework for recognizing and managing OirAEs while preserving systemic anti-tumor immunity.

Uveitis comprises a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory diseases that differ in anatomical location, etiology, clinical course, and immune mechanisms. Despite this diversity, evidence derived predominantly from experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) suggests that oxidative stress may act as a context-dependent amplifier linking immune activation, ocular barrier dysfunction, and tissue injury. Excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) disrupt redox homeostasis and activate redox-sensitive inflammatory signaling, thereby amplifying cytokine production, mitochondrial dysfunction, leukocyte recruitment, and retinal damage. This review summarizes current evidence on oxidative stress in uveitis, focusing on major ROS-generating systems, NF-κB-driven inflammation, Nrf2/HO-1-mediated antioxidant responses, MAPK and PI3K-Akt signaling, and immune–metabolic pathways involved in autoimmune ocular inflammation. Cell-specific responses in retinal and immune cells further illustrate how redox imbalance may contribute to local tissue injury and immune-mediated disease progression. The role of oxidative stress in blood–ocular barrier dysfunction, particularly blood–retinal barrier disruption during posterior segment inflammation, is also discussed. Overall, preclinical studies support an active role for oxidative stress in inflammatory amplification and ocular tissue injury, whereas evidence from patients with defined uveitic entities remains limited, heterogeneous, and largely associative. Redox-directed treatments should therefore currently be regarded as investigational adjunctive strategies rather than established therapies for uveitis.

Antibodies in ocular disease have heterogeneous biological meanings: they may act as direct pathogenic effectors, systemic diagnostic biomarkers, indicators of B-cell clonality, or therapeutic agents. This distinction is particularly important in the eye, where immune privilege and the blood–ocular barrier restrict tissue access, whereas inflammation may permit entry of immunoglobulins, complement, and immune cells or support local humoral responses. This narrative review integrates antibody and B-cell biology across autoimmune and paraneoplastic retinopathies, aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid, ocular myasthenia gravis, thyroid eye disease, systemic autoimmune and fibroinflammatory disorders with ocular involvement, and B-cell malignancies including vitreoretinal and ocular adnexal lymphoma. We distinguish the evidence for direct antibody pathogenicity from disease association and emphasize that a positive result is interpretable only in relation to the ocular phenotype, assay platform, titer, specimen compartment, and orthogonal confirmation. Serum testing, ocular-fluid analysis, electrophysiology, multimodal imaging, cytology, histopathology, immunophenotyping, immunoglobulin clonality, and molecular testing have complementary roles. Therapeutic strategies include B-cell or B-lineage depletion, complement inhibition, cytokine- or receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor blockade, and emerging FcRn- or plasma-cell-directed approaches; however, regulatory status and ocular-specific evidence vary substantially among diseases. A mechanistically stratified framework may reduce overdiagnosis, improve recognition of malignant masquerade syndromes, and support more precise selection of targeted therapy.