Acne vulgaris is an extremely common skin condition, affecting a large population of adolescents, but at the same time, remaining a quite common issue in the group of adult patients. Its complex pathogenesis includes increased sebum secretion, impaired follicular keratinization, colonization of sebaceous glands with Cutibacterium acne bacteria, and the development of inflammation in pilosebaceous units. Although there are many methods of treatment available targeting the mechanisms mentioned above, a large percentage of patients remain undertreated or non-compliant with treatment. Ineffective treatment results in the formation of acne scars, which has a major impact on the well-being and quality of life of the patients. The aim of this publication was a review of available evidence on widely used and novel methods of topical and systemic treatment of acne, additionally including current literature-based analysis of factors affecting patients’ compliance. The strengths and limitations of novel substances for treating acne were discussed. We conclude that an effective acne treatment remains a challenge. A better understanding of current treatment options and factors affecting patients’ compliance could be a helpful tool in choosing a proper treatment option.
Background: Acne scars remain a very common complaint in dermatology practices. Even though many treatment options are available, proper treatment remains a challenge. Complex treatment methods that are based on the synergy effect are the ones that result in better effects and patient satisfaction. Methods: Three healthy female patients with a total of 106 atrophic acne scars were recruited to the split-face study with placebo control, where a series of three microneedling procedures in monthly intervals combined with 5% retinyl palmitate-loaded oleogel was compared to the same microneedling protocol with placebo. Patients’ quality of life was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-29 questionnaires. Patients’ satisfaction with treatment and intensity of post-procedure symptoms were assessed as well. Results: In clinical evaluation, a modest effect was observed regarding the reduction in atrophic acne scars, whereas moderate-to-marked improvement in acne scar reduction was noted by the patients. Additionally, mild to marked improvement was noted by patients regarding skin quality, moisture level, elasticity, and skin tone. No significant side effects were noted. All the above resulted in good patient satisfaction with the treatment, and willingness to repeat the procedures again. No significant differences regarding acne scar reduction, treatment-related symptoms, and skin quality improvement were noted between active substance and placebo-treated sides of the face. Conclusions: Microneedling remains a key method in the therapeutic arsenal for acne scarring. By combining it with 5% retinyl palmitate-loaded oleogel modest effects can be noted after a series of three procedures, with good overall treatment tolerability and patients’ satisfaction.
Topical retinoids are the cornerstone of the treatment of multiple dermatological conditions. Long established in acne therapy, they exert effects on keratinization, inflammation, fibroblast activity, and collagen remodeling, suggesting a potential role in both the prevention and treatment of acne scars. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the use of topical retinoids in acne vulgaris and acne scarring, focusing on different retinoid molecules, formulation technologies, and combination strategies. A review of published clinical and experimental studies evaluating tretinoin, adapalene, tazarotene, and trifarotene was performed, including their use as monotherapy and in combination with other topical agents or procedural interventions. The available data indicate that topical retinoids have a well-established position in acne treatment, can improve the appearance of atrophic acne scars, reduce the progression of scarring, and support skin remodeling. Advances in formulation technologies have improved tolerability, while combination approaches with agents such as benzoyl peroxide, antibiotics or procedural techniques have shown additive or synergistic effects, particularly in more severe cases. Nevertheless, much of the evidence regarding novel formulations is derived from small or heterogeneous study populations. In conclusion, topical retinoids represent a relevant therapeutic option in acne vulgaris and acne scarring, from monotherapy in mild cases to components of multimodal treatment protocols in more severe disease. Further large-scale, comparative studies are needed to better define the optimal clinical use of advanced drug delivery systems for topical retinoids.
Background/Objectives: The development of novel formulations that could have beneficial properties combined with dermatological procedures such as microneedling remains a challenge. The group of patients that could benefit from such a novel protocol is large and includes patients with acne scars. Both topical retinyl palmitate and the microneedling procedure have strong fibroblast-stimulating properties. Methods: In the study 5% w/w retinyl palmitate-loaded nanoemulsions and oleogel were prepared and examined to obtain formulations that meet criteria eligible for formulations combined with microneedling. All formulations were designed for aseptic preparation. Multiple nanoemulsion compositions were tested to select the optimal one. The selected 5% w/w retinyl palmitate-loaded nanoemulsion and oleogel were tested. Results: While retinyl palmitate-loaded oleogel met proper pharmacopeial norms for drug content and stability, the retinyl palmitate-loaded nanoemulsion, even though it demonstrated adequate physical parameters, maintained active substance losses during the manufacturing process above required limits. Conclusions: The retinyl palmitate-loaded nanoemulsion and oleogel remain promising formulations that could potentially be combined with microneedling. Considering its high sensitivity to manufacturing conditions, preparation of the retinyl palmitate-loaded nanoemulsion still remains a challenge.